Advertisement

Human Nature

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 1–18 | Cite as

The Social Strategy Game

Resource Competition within Female Social Networks among Small-scale Forager-Horticulturalists
  • Stacey L. RucasEmail author
  • Michael Gurven
  • Hillard Kaplan
  • Jeffrey Winking
Article

Abstract

This paper examines social determinants of resource competition among Tsimane Amerindian women of Bolivia. We introduce a semi-anonymous experiment (the Social Strategy Game) designed to simulate resource competition among women. Information concerning dyadic social relationships and demographic data were collected to identify variables influencing resource competition intensity, as measured by the number of beads one woman took from another. Relationship variables are used to test how the affiliative or competitive aspects of dyads affect the extent of prosociality in the game. Using a mixed-modeling procedure, we find that women compete with those with whom they are quarreling over accusations of meat theft, mate competition, and rumor spreading. They also compete with members of their social network and with those who were designated as cooperative helpers or as close kin. Women take fewer beads from desired friends, neighbors, and from those viewed as enemies. We interpret favoritism toward enemies as resulting from fear of retribution. Our results suggest that social relations among women are multifaceted and often cannot be simplified by exclusive focus on genetic relatedness, physical proximity, or reciprocity. We argue that a complex understanding of cooperation and competition among women may require important contextual information concerning relationship history in addition to typical features of resource ecology.

Keywords

Experimental economics Social networks Resource competition Altruism Tsimane 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Tsimane women of our host communities for their gracious participation and wonderful camaraderie. This research was funded by LAII Field Research Grants, provided by the Tinker Foundation, and by NSF grant BCS-013274. We would also like to thank Dan Fessler, Steve Gangestad, and our anonymous reviewers for their helpful criticisms.

References

  1. Anderson, C. M. (2000). The persistence of polygyny as an adaptive response to poverty and oppression in apartheid South Africa. Cross-Cultural Research, 34, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, K. G., Kaplan, H., & Lancaster, J. (1999). Parental care by genetic and step fathers, I: Reports by men in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression? Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1987). Resources and reproductive success in women, with an example from the Kipsigis. Journal of Zoology, 213, 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50, 164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, A. (1995). A few good men: Evolutionary psychology and female adolescent aggression. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, A. (2002). A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, A., Muncer, S., Guy, A., & Banhim, M. (1996). Social representation of aggression: Crossing the sex barrier. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cashdan, E. (1998). Are men more competitive than women? British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 213–229.Google Scholar
  12. Cashdan, E. (2003). Hormones and competitive aggression in women. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chagnon, N. A. (1990). Reproductive and somatic conflicts of interest in the genesis of violence and warfare among tribesmen. In J. Haas (Ed.), Anthropology of war (pp. 77–104). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cordain, L., Brand Miller, J., Boyd Eaton, S., et al. (2000). Plant-animal subsistence ratios and macronutrient energy estimations in worldwide hunter-gatherer diets. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71, 682–692.Google Scholar
  15. Crick, N. R. (1995). Relational aggression: The role of intent attributions, feelings of distress, and provocation type. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cronk, L. (1994). Wealth, status and reproductive success among the Mukogodo of Kenya. American Anthropologist, 93, 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
  18. Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (1998). Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Economic Journal, 108, 726–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flinn, M., Geary, D., & Ward, C. (2005). Ecological dominance, social competition and coalitionary arms races: Why humans evolved extraordinary intelligence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 10–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gurven, M. (2004). Economic games among the Amazonian Tsimane: Exploring the roles of market access, costs of giving, and cooperation on pro-social game behavior. Experimental Economics, 7, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gurven, M., & Walker, R. (2006). Energetic demand of multiple dependents and the evolution of slow human growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 273, 835–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gurven, M., & Winking, J. (2008). Collective action in action: Prosocial behavior in and out of the laboratory. American Anthropologist, 110, 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., & Gutierrez, M. (2006). How long does it take to become a proficient hunter? Implications for the evolution of extended development and long lifespan. Journal of Human Evolution, 51, 454–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., & Supa, A. Z. (2007). Mortality experience of Tsimane Amerindians of Bolivia: Regional variation and temporal trends. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 376–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gurven, M., Zanolini, A., & Schniter, E. (2008). Culture sometimes matters: Intra-cultural variation in division norms among Tsimane Amerindians, real or spurious? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67, 587–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., Blurton Jones, N. G., Alvarez, H., & Charnov, E. L. (1998). Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 1336–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., et al. (2001). In search of Homo economicus: Experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review, 91, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., et al. (Eds.) (2004). Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hess, N. C. (2006). Informational warfare: The evolution of female coalitions and gossip. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  31. Hess, N. C., & Hagen, E. H. (2006a). Psychological adaptations for assessing gossip believability. Human Nature, 17, 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hess, N. C., & Hagen, E. H. (2006b). Sex differences in indirect aggression: Psychological evidence from young adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hurtado, A. M., Hawkes, K., Hill, K., & Kaplan, H. (1985). Female subsistence strategies among Ache hunter-gatherers of eastern Paraguay. Human Ecology, 13, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Janson, C. H. (2000). Primate socio-ecology: The end of a golden age. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kelly, R. L. (1995). The foraging spectrum: Diversity in hunter-gatherer lifeways. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lamphere, L. (1977). The Navajo cultural system: An analysis of concepts of cooperation and autonomy and their relation to gossip and witchcraft. In M. Opler (Ed.), Apachean culture history and ethnology (pp. 91–114). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lamphere, L., & Rosaldo, M. Z. (Eds.) (1974). Woman, culture and society. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lancaster, J. B. (1991). A feminist and evolutionary biologist looks at women. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 34, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levitt, S., & List, J. (2009). What do laboratory experiments tell us about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marlowe, F. (2001). Male contribution to diet and female reproductive success among foragers. Current Anthropology, 42, 755–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGraw, K. J. (2002). Environmental predictors of geographic variation in human mating preferences. Ethology, 108, 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parker, G. A., Baker, R. R., & Smith, F. C. F. (1972). The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 36, 529–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pelegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys: Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 142–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roberts, G., & Sheratt, T. N. (1998). Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment. Nature, 394, 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rucas, S. L. (2004). Female intrasexual social behaviors among the Tsimane of Bolivia. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
  46. Silk, J. (1983). Local resource competition and facultative adjustment of sex ratios in relation to competitive abilities. American Naturalist, 121, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Silk, J. B., Alberts, S. C., & Altmann, J. (2003). Social bonds of female baboons enhance infant survival. Science, 302, 1231–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Silk, J. B., Alberts, S. C., & Altmann, J. (2004). Patterns of coalition formation by adult female baboons in Amboseli, Kenya. Animal Behaviour, 67, 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Underwood, M. K. (2003). Social aggression among girls. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  51. Wagner, J. D., Flinn, M. V., & England, B. G. (2002). Hormonal response to competition among male coalitions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 437–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Waynforth, D. (1999). Differences in time use for mating and nepotistic effort as a function of male attractiveness in rural Belize. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk-taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wrangham, R. W., & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic males: Apes and the origins of human violence. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  55. Yamaguchi, H. (1992). Formations of grand coalition when consciousness of intragroup competition is activated. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 62, 357–363.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stacey L. Rucas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael Gurven
    • 2
  • Hillard Kaplan
    • 3
  • Jeffrey Winking
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesCalifornia Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly)San Luis ObispoUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of California Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  4. 4.Department of AnthropologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations