Human Nature

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 331–346 | Cite as

Face to Face

The Perception of Automotive Designs
  • Sonja Windhager
  • Dennis E. Slice
  • Katrin Schaefer
  • Elisabeth Oberzaucher
  • Truls Thorstensen
  • Karl Grammer
Article

Abstract

Over evolutionary time, humans have developed a selective sensitivity to features in the human face that convey information on sex, age, emotions, and intentions. This ability might not only be applied to our conspecifics nowadays, but also to other living objects (i.e., animals) and even to artificial structures, such as cars. To investigate this possibility, we asked people to report the characteristics, emotions, personality traits, and attitudes they attribute to car fronts, and we used geometric morphometrics (GM) and multivariate statistical methods to determine and visualize the corresponding shape information. Automotive features and proportions are found to covary with trait perception in a manner similar to that found with human faces. Emerging analogies are discussed. This study should have implications for both our understanding of our prehistoric psyche and its interrelation with the modern world.

Keywords

Automobiles Faces Geometric morphometrics Human perception Maturity Trait allocation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Anika Bruns for her great support, and F. James Rohlf for his valuable comments and for the adjustment of his program tpsPLS for our purpose. We are also grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful remarks. This work was funded by a research grant from EFS Unternehmensberatung, and, in part, by the Austrian Council for Science and Technology grant GZ 200.093/I-VI/I/2004 and the EU FP6 Marie Curie Actions grant MRTN-CT-2005-019564 (EVAN).

References

  1. Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgements at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(3), 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyle, M. (2002). Körpersprache & Kommunikation: Das Handbuch zur nonverbalen Kommunikation (8th ed.). Paderborn: Junfermann.Google Scholar
  3. Ashmore, R. D., & Tumia, M. L. (1980). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory, I: A personality description approach to the assessment of sex stereotypes. Sex Roles, 6, 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atzwanger, K. (1995). Der Steinzeitjäger im Straßenkreuzer: Humanethologische Aspekte aggressiven Auffahrens auf der Autobahn. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
  5. Autodesk (2006). 3ds Max (Version 8). San Rafael, USA: Autodesk Media & Entertainment.Google Scholar
  6. Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brannigan, C. R., & Humphries, D. A. (1972). Human non-verbal behaviour, a means of communication. In N. G. Blurton Jones (Ed.), Ethological studies of child behaviour (pp. 37–64). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bulbulia, J. (2004). The cognitive and evolutionary psychology of religion. Biology and Philosophy, 19, 655–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  11. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Coss, R. G. (2003). The role of evolved perceptual biases in art and design. In E. Voland, & K. Grammer (Eds.), Evolutionary aesthetics (pp. 69–130). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Desmet, P. M. A., Hekkert, P., & Jacobs, J. J. (2000). When a car makes you smile: Development and application of an instrument to measure product emotions. In S. J. Hoch & R. J. Meyer (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research 27 (111–117).Google Scholar
  14. Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish, & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45–60). Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Enlow, D. H., & Hans, M. G. (1996). Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  16. Erk, S., Spitzer, M., Wunderlich, A. P., Galley, L., & Walter, H. (2002). Cultural objects modulate reward circuitry. NeuroReport, 13, 2499–2503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fink, B., Grammer, K., Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Schaefer, K., Bookstein, F. L., et al. (2005). Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 1995–2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Core, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comperative Psychology, 108, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henderson, J. M., Falk, R., Minut, S., Dyer, F. C., & Mahadevan, S. (2001). Gaze control for face learning and recognition in humans and machines. In T. Shipley, & P. Kellman (Eds.), From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision (pp. 463–481). New York: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hess, U., & Blairy, S. (2001). Facial mimicry and emotional contagion to dynamic emotional facial expressions and their influence on decoding accuracy. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Juergens, M. (2003). Fies à vis. Auto Motor Sport, 25, 44.Google Scholar
  26. Keating, C. F., Mazur, A., & Segal, M. H. (1977). Facial gestures which influence the perception of status. Sociometry, 40, 374–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keating, C. F., Randall, D. W., Kendrick, T., & Gutshall, K. A. (2003). Do babyfaced adults receive more help? The (cross-cultural) case of the lost resume. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenny, D. A., Horner, C., Kashy, D. A., & Chu, L. C. (1992). Consensus at zero acquaintance: Replication, behavioral cues, and stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kerssenbrock, F. (2005). Sie leben! Design. Emotion ist alles, wissen Autohersteller—und lassen ihre Modelle immer öfter nach dem Vorbild des menschlichen Gesichts gestalten. Profil, (March) 72–74.Google Scholar
  30. Kohler, C. G., Turner, T., Stolar, N. M., Bilker, W. B., Brensinger, C. M., Gur, R. E., et al. (2004). Differences in facial expressions of four universal emotions. Psychiatry Research, 128, 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lorenz, K. (1943). Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Entfaltung. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 5, 235–409.Google Scholar
  32. Mark, L. S., Shaw, R. E., & Pittenger, J. B. (1988). Natural vonstraints, scales of analysis, and information for the perception of growing faces. In T. R. Alley (Ed.), Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces (pp. 11–49). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  33. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Otta, E., Abrosio, F. F. E., & Hoshino, R. L. (1996). Reading a smiling face: Messages conveyed by various forms of smiling. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1111–1121.Google Scholar
  35. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pittenger, J. B., Shaw, R. E., & Mark, L. S. (1979). Perceptual information for the age level of faces as a higher order invariant of growth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 478–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rohlf, F. J. (2005a). tpsDig2 (Version 2.04): Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Rohlf, F. J. (2005b). tpsPLS (Version 1.18): Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Rohlf, F. J. (2005c). tpsRegr (Version 1.31): Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Rohlf, F. J., & Corti, M. (2000). The use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape. Systematic Biology, 49, 740–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (1990). Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39, 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schaefer, K., Fink, B., Mitteroecker, P., Neave, N., & Bookstein, F. L. (2005). Visualizing facial shape regression upon 2nd to 4th digit ratio and testosterone. Collegium Antropologicum, 29, 415–419.Google Scholar
  43. Schirman, D. (2006). Der Citroen DS 19—“Die Göttin.” Design. France: ARTE.Google Scholar
  44. Streissguth, A. P., Bookstein, F. L., Sampson, P. D., & Barr, H. M. (1993). The enduring effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on child development. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  45. Thayer, S., & Schiff, W. (1969). Stimulus factors in observer judgment of social interaction: Facial expression and motion pattern. American Journal of Psychology, 82, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ursi, W. J., Trotman, C. A., McNamara Jr., J. A., & Behrents, R. G. (1993). Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth. Angle Orthodontist, 63, 47–56.Google Scholar
  47. Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonja Windhager
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dennis E. Slice
    • 2
    • 4
  • Katrin Schaefer
    • 2
  • Elisabeth Oberzaucher
    • 1
  • Truls Thorstensen
    • 3
  • Karl Grammer
    • 1
  1. 1.Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institute for Urban Ethology, Department of AnthropologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.EFS Unternehmensberatung GmbHViennaAustria
  4. 4.Department of Scientific ComputingFlorida State University, Dirac Science LibraryTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations