Human Nature

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 157–173 | Cite as

The Morning after the Night Before

Affective Reactions to One-Night Stands among Mated and Unmated Women and Men
  • Anne CampbellEmail author


Benefits to females of short-term mating have recently been identified, and it has been suggested that women have evolved adaptations for this strategy. One piece of evidence supporting such a female adaptation would be that women find the experience of a one-night stand as affectively positive as men. Individuals (N = 1,743) who had experienced a one-night stand were asked to rate aspects of their “morning after” feelings (six positive and six negative). Women were significantly more negative and less positive than men. Although women did not especially view these relationships as a prelude to long-term relationships, they felt greater regret than men about having been “used.” Extra-pair copulations were rated more negatively, but not less positively, than singles’ experiences. There was no interaction between gender and mated status on positivity or negativity. Although, in terms of subsequent affective response, women do not seem well adapted to casual sexual encounters, it may be important to distinguish impelling sexual motivation preceding intercourse from later evaluations of the event. Menstrual cycle changes may also be important in altering the strength and target of sexual motivation.


One-night stand Mating strategy Sex differences Affective reactions 


  1. Allen, E. S., Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., Snyder, D. K., Gordon, K. C., & Glass, S. P. (2005). Intrapersonal, interpersonal and contextual factors in engaging in and responding to extramarital involvement. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 12, 101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, P. W., Gangestad, S. W., & Matthews, D. (2002). Adaptationism: how to carry out an exaptationist program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6, 166–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beach, S. R. H., Jouriles, E. N., & O’Leary, D. K. (1985). Extramarital sex: impact on depression and commitment in couples seeking marital therapy. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 11, 99–108.Google Scholar
  6. Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bleske, A. L., & Buss, D. M. (2000). A comprehensive theory of human mating must explain between-sex and within-sex differences in mating strategy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 593–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K. (2005). Infidelity in committed relationships: II. A substantive review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss, D. M. (1989). Conflict between the sexes: strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 735–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chisholm, J. F. (1999). Attachment and time preference: relations between early stress and sexual behavior in a sample of American university women. Human Nature, 10, 51–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution and behavior. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  13. de Graaf, H., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2004). Gender differences in affective response to sexual rejection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: the role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver, C. E. (2002). Changes in women’s sexual interests and their partners’ mate retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 269, 975–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Adaptations to ovulation. In D. M. Buss (Ed.) Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 344–371). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Geary, D. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  20. Glass, S. P. (2003). Not “just friends”: Protect your relationship from infidelity and heal the trauma of betrayal. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1985). Sex differences in type of extramarital involvement and marital dissatisfaction. Sex Roles, 12, 1101–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1992). Justifications for extramarital relationships: the association between attitudes, behaviours, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 361–387.Google Scholar
  23. Grammer, K., Renninger, L., & Fischer, B. (2004). Disco clothing, female sexual motivation and relationship status: is she dressed to impress? Journal of Sex Research, 41, 66–74.Google Scholar
  24. Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Women’s sexual strategies: the hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The affective shift hypothesis: the functions of emotional changes following sexual intercourse. Personal Relationships, 8, 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hrdy, S. B. (1981). The woman that never evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jennions, M. D., & Petrie, M. (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75, 21–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnston, V. S. (2003). The origin and function of pleasure. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits and the stages of human courtship: qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krug, R., Pietrowsky, R., Fehm, H. L., & Born, J. (1994). Selective influence of menstrual cycle on perception of stimuli of reproductive significance. Psychosomatic Medicine, 56, 410–417.Google Scholar
  32. Krug, R., Plihal, W., Fehm, H. L., & Born, J. (2000). Selective influence of the menstrual cycle on perception of stimuli with reproductive significance: an event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 37, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyerling, R. A., & Epling-McWherter, E. A. (1986). Decision-making in extramarital relationships. Lifestyles, 8, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mikach, S. M., & Bailey, J. M. (1999). What distinguishes women with unusually high numbers of sex partners? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 141–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of “casual” sex: a qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Regan, P. C. (1996). Rhythms of desire: the association between menstrual cycle phases and female sexual desire. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5, 145–156.Google Scholar
  39. Regan, P. C. (1998). What if you can’t get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1294–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ridley, M. (1993). The red queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  41. Scheib, J. E. (2001). Context-specific mate choice criteria: women’s trade-offs in the context of long-term and extra-pair mateships. Personal Relationships, 8, 371–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmitt, D. P. (2005a). Fundamental strategies of human mating. In D. M. Buss (Ed.) Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 258–291). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Schmitt, D. P. (2005b). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: a 48-nation study of sex, culture and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275.Google Scholar
  44. Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allick, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., Bennett, K. L., et al. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: tests from 52 nations, 6 continents and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntley, J., Tooke, W., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The desire for sexual variety as a key to understanding basic human mating strategies. Personal Relationships, 8, 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., LaMunyon, C. W., Quintus, B. J., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2004). Sex differences in sexual psychology produce sex similar preferences for a short-term mate. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 405–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shackelford, T. K., Pound, N., & Goetz, A. T. (2005). Psychological and physiological adaptations to sperm competition in humans. Review of General Psychology, 9, 228–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Slob, A. K., Bax, C. M., Hop, W. C., Rowland, D. L., & van der Werflen Bosch, J. J. (1996). Sexual arousability and the menstrual cycle. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 21, 545–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smuts, B. B. (1985). Sex and friendship in baboons. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  50. Spanier, G. B., & Margolis, R. L. (1983). Marital separation and extramarital sexual behaviour. Journal of Sex Research, 19, 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Surbey, M. K., & Conohan, C. D. (2000). Willingness to engage in casual sex: the role of parental qualities and perceived risk of aggression. Human Nature, 11, 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and human sexual behaviour. Psychological Science, 5, 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Townsend, J. M. (1995). Sex without emotional involvement: an evolutionary interpretation of sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24, 171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Townsend, J. M., Kline, J., & Wasserman, T. H. (1995). Low-investment copulation: sex differences in motivations and emotional reactions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.) Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 139–179). New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  58. Udry, J., & Billy, J. (1987). Initiation of coitus in early adolescence. American Sociological Review, 52, 841–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wiederman, M. W., & Dubois, S. L. (1998). Evolution and sex differences in preferences for short-term mates: evidence from a policy capturing study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Woodward, K., & Richards, M. H. (2005). The parental investment model and minimum mate choice criteria in humans. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wright, T. M., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Personality and unrestricted sexual behaviour: correlations of sociosexuality in Caucasian and Asian college students. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 166–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentDurham UniversityDurhamEngland

Personalised recommendations