Amounts Spent on Engagement Rings Reflect Aspects of Male and Female Mate Quality
Previous research has shown that the qualities of nuptial gifts among nonhumans and marriage-related property transfers in human societies such as bridewealth and dowry covary with aspects of mate quality. This article explores this issue for another type of marriage-related property transfer: engagement rings. We obtained data on engagement ring costs and other variables through a mail survey sent to recently married individuals living in the American Midwest. This article focuses on survey responses regarding rings that were purchased by men acting alone and using only their own funds who then presented the rings while making surprise proposals of marriage (n = 127). Men marrying younger women spent more on rings, as did men who earned more money and whose fiancées earned more money. These findings suggest that the amounts spent on engagement rings, like bridewealth and dowry payments in other societies, reflect aspects of both male and female mate quality.
KeywordsCourtship Mating Engagement rings Marriage Nuptial gifts Marriage transactions
Funding for this project was provided by the Center for Human Evolutionary Studies and the Department of Anthropology at Rutgers University.
- Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1988). Kipsigis bridewealth payments. In L. L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. W. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour (pp. 65–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bourque, L. B., & Fielder, E. P. (1995). How to conduct self-administered and mail surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Brinig, M. F. (1990). Rings and promises. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6, 203–215.Google Scholar
- Camerer, C. (1988). Gifts as economic signals and social symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S180–S214.Google Scholar
- Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.Google Scholar
- Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Rothman, E. K. (1984). Hands and hearts: A history of courtship in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Fundamentals of human mating strategies. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of human evolutionary psychology (pp. 258–291). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar