Semen displacement as a sperm competition strategy
Using a sample of 652 college students, we examined several implications of the hypothesis that the shape of the human penis evolved to enable males to substitute their semen for those of their rivals. The incidence of double mating by females appears sufficient to make semen displacement adaptive (e.g., one in four females acknowledge infidelity, one in eight admit having sex with two or more males in a 24-hour period, and one in 12 report involvement in one or more sexual threesomes with two males). We also document several changes in post-ejaculatory behavior (e.g., reduced thrusting, penis withdrawal, loss of an erection) which may have evolved to minimize displacement of the male’s own semen. Consistent with predictions derived from a theoretical model (Gallup and Burch 2006), we discovered that most females report waiting at least 48 hours following an instance of infidelity before resuming sex with their in-pair partners.
Key wordsCuckoldry Double mating Genital morphology Paternity Post-ejacu-latory changes Sperm competition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anderson, K. G. 2006 How Well Does Paternity Confidence Match Actual Paternity? Results from Worldwide Nonpaternity Rates. Current Anthropology 48:511–518.Google Scholar
- Baker, R. R., and M. A. Bellis 1995 Human Sperm Competition: Copulation, Masturbation, and Infidelity. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
- Buss, D. M. 2002 Human Mate Guarding. Neuroendocrinology Letters 23(Suppl. 4):23–29.Google Scholar
- Douglas, K. A., J. L. Collins, C. Warren, L. Kann, R. Gold, S. Clayton, J. G. Ross, and L. J. Kolbe 1997 Results from the 1995 National College Health Risk Behavior Survey. Journal of American College Health 46:55–66.Google Scholar
- Gallup, G. G. Jr., and R. L. Burch 2004 Semen Displacement as a Sperm Competition Strategy. Evolutionary Psychology 2:12–23.Google Scholar
- 2006 The Semen Displacement Hypothesis: Semen Hydraulics and the Intra-Pair Copulation Proclivity Model of Femal Infidelity. In Female Infidelity and Paternal Uncertainty. Steven M. Platek and Todd K. Shackelford, eds. Pp. 129–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Goetz, A. T., and T. K. Shackelford 2006 Sexual Coercion and Forced In-Pair Copulation as Sperm Competition Tactics in Humans. Human Nature 17:265–282.Google Scholar
- Goetz, A. T., T. K. Shackelford, V. A. Weekes-Shackelford, H. A. Euler, S. Hoier, D. P. Schmitt, and C. W. LaMunyon 2005 Mate Retention, Semen Displacement, and Human Sperm Competition: A Preliminary Investigation of Tactics to Prevent and Correct Female Infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences 38:749–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Laumann, E. O., J. H. Gagnon, R. T. Michael, and S. Michaels 1994 The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Platek, S. M., S. R. Critton, R. L. Burch, D. A. Frederick, T. S. Myers, and G. G. Gallup, Jr. 2003 How Much Resemblance Is Enough? Determination of a Just Noticeable Difference at which Male Reactions towards Children’s Faces Change from Indifferent to Positive. Evolution and Human Behavior 23:81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shackelford, T. K. 2003 Preventing, Correcting, and Anticipating Female Infidelity. Evolution and Cognition 9:1–7.Google Scholar
- Smith, R. L. 1984 Human Sperm Competition. In Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, R. L. Smith, ed. Pp. 601–660. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar