Human Nature

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 271–282 | Cite as

Relative digit lengths predict men’s behavior and attractiveness during social interactions with women

Article

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that the ratio of the lengths of the second and fourth fingers (2D:4D) may reflect degree of prenatal androgen exposure in humans. In the present study, we tested the hypotheses that 2D:4D would be associated with ratings of men’s attractiveness and with levels of behavioral displays during social interactions with potential mates. Our results confirm that male 2D:4D was significantly negatively correlated with women’s ratings of men’s physical attractiveness and levels of courtship-like behavior during a brief conversation. These findings provide novel evidence for the organizational effects of hormones on human male attractiveness and social behavior.

Key words

2D:4D Attractiveness Courtship Testosterones 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, J. B., S. M. Breedlove, and D. Crews 1992 Behavioral Endocrinology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M. 1993 EQS: Structural Equations Program Manual. Los Angeles: BMPD Statistical Software.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, W. M., M. Hines, B. A. Fane, and S. M. Breedlove 2002 Masculinized Finger Length Patterns in Human Males and Females with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. Hormones and Behavior 42:380–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chatterton, R. T., K. M. Vogelsong, Y. C. Lu, and G. A. Hudgens 1997 Hormonal Responses to Psychological Stress in Men Preparing for Skydiving. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 82:2503–2509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins, S. A. 2000 Men’s Voices and Women’s Choices. Animal Behaviour 60:773–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dixson, A. F., G. Halliwell, R. East, P. Wignarajah, and M. J. Anderson 2003 Masculine Somatotype and Hirsuteness as Determinants of Sexual Attractiveness to Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior 32:29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fink, B., J. T. Manning, N. Neave, and K. Grammer 2004 Second to Fourth Digit Ratio and Facial Asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior 25:125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gangestad, S. W., and J. A. Simpson 2000 The Evolution of Mating: Trade-Offs and Strategic Pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:573–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garn, S. M., A. R. Burdi, W. J. Babler, and S. Stinson 1975 Early Prenatal Attainment of Adult Metacarpal-Phalangeal Rank and Proportions. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 43:327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnston, V. S., R. Hagel, M. Franklin, B. Fink, and K. Grammer 2001 Male Facial Attractiveness: Evidence for Hormone-Mediated Adaptive Design. Evolution and Human Behavior 22:251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maisey, D. S., E. L. E. Vale, P. L. Cornelissen, and M. J. Tovee 1999 Characteristics of Male Attractiveness for Women. Lancet 353:1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Manning, J. T. 2002 Digit Ratio: A Pointer to Fertility, Behavior, and Health. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Manning, J. T., and R. P. Taylor 2001 2nd to 4th Digit Ratio and Male Ability in Sport: Implications for Sexual Selection in Humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 22:61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Manning, J. T., L. Barley, J. Walton, D. I. Lewis-Jones, R. L. Trivers, D. Singh, R. Thornhill, P. Rhode, T. Bereczkei, P. Henzi, M. Soler, and A. Szwed 2000 The 2nd:4th Digit Ratio, Sexual Dimorphism, Population Differences, and Reproductive Success: Evidence for Sexually Antagonistic Genes? Evolution and Human Behavior 21:163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Manning, J. T., S. Baron-Cohen, S. Wheelwright, and G. Sanders 2001 The 2nd to 4th Digit Ratio and Autism. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 43:160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manning, J. T., P. E. Bundred, D. J. Newton, and B. F. Flanagan 2003 The 2nd to 4th Digit Ratio and Variation in the Androgen Receptor Gene. Evolution and Human Behavior 24: 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Manning, J. T., P. Henzi, P. Venkatramana, S. Martin, and D. Singh 2003 Second to Fourth Digit Ratio: Ethnic Differences and Family Size in English, Indian, and South African Populations. Annals of Human Biology 30:579–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Manning, J. T., D. Scutt, J. Wilson, and D. I. Lewis-Jones 1998 The Ratio of 2nd to 4th Digit Length: A Predictor Sperm Numbers and Concentrations of Testosterone, Luteinizing Hormone and Oestrogen. Human Reproduction 13:3000–3004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manning, J. T., R. L. Trivers, R. Thornhill, and D. Singh 2000 2nd to 4th Digit Ratio and Left Lateralized Preference in Jamaican Children. Laterality 5:121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McFadden, D., and E. Shubel 2002 Relative Lengths of Fingers and Toes in Human Males and Females. Hormones and Behavior 42:492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller, G. F. 2000 Evolution of Human Music through Sexual Selection. In The Origins of Music, N. L. Wallen, B. Merker and S. Brown, eds. Pp. 329–360. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Neave, N., S. Laing, B. Fink, and J. T. Manning 2003 Second to Fourth Digit Ratio, Testosterone, and Perceived Male Dominance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270:2167–2172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Penton-Voak, I. S., B. C. Jones, A. C. Little, S. Baker, B. Tiddeman, D. M. Burt, and D. I. Perrett 2001 Symmetry, Sexual Dimorphism in Facial Proportions and Male Attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268:1617–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Penton-Voak, I. S., D. I. Perrett, D. L. Castles, T. Kobayashi, D. M. Burt, L. K. Murray, and R. Minamisawa 1999 Menstrual Cycle Alters Face Preference. Nature 399:741–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perrett, D. I., K. J. Lee, I. Penton-Voak, D. Rowland, S. Yoshikawa, D. M. Burt, D. M. Henzi, D. L. Castles, and S. Akamatsu 1998 Effects of Sexual Dimorphism on Facial Attractiveness. Nature 394:884–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rhodes, G., J. Chan, L. A. Zebrowitz, and L. W. Simmons 2003 Does Sexual Dimorphism in Human Faces Signal Health? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B (Suppl.) 270:93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rikowski, A., and K. Grammer 1999 Human Body Odour, Symmetry and Attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266:869–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roney, J. R., S. V. Mahler, and D. Maestripieri 2003 Behavioral and Hormonal Responses of Men to Brief Interactions with Women. Evolution and Human Behavior 24:365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sluming, V. A., and J. T. Manning 2000 Second to Fourth Digit Ratio in Elite Musicians: Evidence for Musical Ability as an Honest Signal of Male Fitness. Evolution and Human Behavior 21:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Swaddle, J. P., and G. W. Reierson 2002 Testosterone Increases Perceived Dominance But Not Attractiveness in Human Males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:2285–2289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wood, S., E. Vang, J. Manning, J. Walton, S. Troup, C. Kingsland, and I. Lewis-Jones 2003 The Ratio of 2nd to 4th Digit Length in Azoospermic Males Undergoing Surgical Sperm Retrieval: Predictive Value for Sperm Retrieval and on Subsequent Fertilization and Pregnancy Rates in IVF/ICSI Cycles. Journal of Andrology 24:871–877.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Aldine Transaction 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations