We trained chickens to react to an average human female face but not to an average male face (or vice versa). In a subsequent test, the animals showed preferences for faces consistent with human sexual preferences (obtained from university students). This suggests that human preferences arise from general properties of nervous systems, rather than from face-specific adaptations. We discuss this result in the light of current debate on the meaning of sexual signals and suggest further tests of existing hypotheses about the origin of sexual preferences.
Key wordsFacial attractiveness Handicap principle Receiver bias Sexual selection
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Andersson, M. 1994 Sexual Selection. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Buss, D. M. 1999 Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Enquist, M., and A. Arak 1998 Neural Representation and the Evolution of Signal Form. In Cognitive Ethology, R. Dukas, ed. Pp. 1–420. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Enquist, M., S. Ghirlanda, D. Lundqvist, and C.-A. Wachtmeister 2002 An Ethological Theory of Attractiveness. In Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives, G. Rhodes and L. A. Zebrowitz, eds. Pp. 127–151. Advances in Visual Cognition, Vol. 1. Westport, Connecticut: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Kobayashi, T. 1999 Do Mynahs Prefer Peacock Feathers of More Regular Pattern? Ornis Svecica 9:59–64.Google Scholar
- Mackintosh, N. 1974 The Psychology of Animal Learning. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar