Advertisement

Human Nature

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 299–306 | Cite as

Female coital orgasm and male attractiveness

  • Todd K. Shackelford
  • Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford
  • Gregory J. LeBlanc
  • April L. Bleske
  • Harald A. Euler
  • Sabine Hoier
Article

Abstract

Female coital orgasm may be an adaptation for preferentially retaining the sperm of males with “good genes.” One indicator of good genes may be physical attractiveness. Accordingly, R. Thornhill, S. W. Gangestad, and R. Comer (1995) found that women mated to more attractive men reported an orgasm during a greater proportion of copulations than did women mated to less attractive men. The current research replicates this finding, with several design variations. We collected self-report data from 388 women residing in the United States or in Germany. Results support the hypothesis that women mated to more attractive men are more likely to report an orgasm at the most recent copulation than are women mated to less attractive men, after statistically controlling for several key variables. Discussion addresses (a) the inability of the present research to specify the causal link between female orgasm and male attractiveness and (b) the proactive nature of female sexuality documented in recent research guided by an evolutionary perspective.

Key words

Evolutionary psychology Female coital orgasm Male attractiveness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, R. R., and M. A. Bellis 1993 Human Sperm Competition: Ejaculate Manipulation by Females and a Function for the Female Orgasm. Animal Behaviour 46:887–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 1995 Human Sperm Competition. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Gangestad, S. W. 1993 Sexual Selection and Physical Attractiveness: Implications for Mating Dynamics. Human Nature 4:205–235.Google Scholar
  4. Gangestad, S. W., R. Thornhill, and R. A. Yeo 1994 Facial Attractiveness, Developmental Stability, and Fluctuating Asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology 15:73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Singh, D., W. Meyer, R. J. Zambarano, and D. F. Hurlbert 1998 Frequency and Timing of Coital Orgasm in Women Desirous of Becoming Pregnant. Archives of Sexual Behavior 27:15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Thornhill, R., S. W. Gangestad, and R. Comer 1995 Human Female Orgasm and Mate Fluctuating Asymmetry. Animal Behaviour 50:1601–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Trudel, G., L. Boulos, and B. Matte 1993 Dyadic Adjustment in Couples with Hypoactive Sexual Desire. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy 12:31–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Todd K. Shackelford
    • 3
  • Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford
    • 3
  • Gregory J. LeBlanc
    • 3
  • April L. Bleske
    • 1
  • Harald A. Euler
    • 2
  • Sabine Hoier
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Texas at AustinUSA
  2. 2.University of KasselGermany
  3. 3.Division of Science—PsychologyFlorida Atlantic UniversityDavie

Personalised recommendations