Human Nature

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 281–297 | Cite as

Is human conversation more efficient than chimpanzee grooming?

Comparison of clique sizes
Article

Abstract

Clique sizes for chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) grooming and for human conversation are compared in order to test Robin Dunbar’s hypothesis that human language is almost three times as efficient a bonding mechanism as primate grooming. Recalculation of the data provided by Dunbar et al. (1995) reveals that the average clique size for human conversation is 2.72 whereas that of chimpanzee grooming is shown to be 2.18. The efficiency of human conversation and actual chimpanzee grooming over Dunbar’s primate grooming model (always one-to-one and a one-way interaction) is 1.27 and 1.25, respectively, when we take role alternation into account. Chimpanzees can obtain about the same efficiency as humans in terms of quantity of social interactions because their grooming is often mutual and polyadic.

Key words

Bonding mechanisms Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytesClique size Conversation Efficiency Grooming 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boccia, M. L. 1983 A Functional Analysis of Social Grooming Patterns through Direct Comparison with Self-Grooming in Rhesus Monkeys. International Journal of Primatology 4:399–418.Google Scholar
  2. Caccone, A., and R. Powell 1989 DNA Divergence among Hominoids. Evolution 43:925–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooper, M. A., and I. S. Bernstein 2000 Social Grooming in Assames Macaques (Macaca assamensis). American Journal of Primatology 50:77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Waal, F. B. M. 1989 Peacemaking among Primates. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 1997 The Chimpanzee’s Service Economy: Food for Grooming. Evolution and Human Behavior 18:375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunbar, R. I. M. 1991 Functional Significance of Social Grooming in Primates. Folia Primatologica 57:121–131.Google Scholar
  7. 1992 Neocortex Size as a Constraint on Group Size in Primates. Journal of Human Evolution 20:469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 1993 Coevolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size and Language in Humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:681–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 1996 Grooming, Gossip and Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dunbar, R. I. M., N. D. C. Duncan, and D. Nettle 1995 Size and Structure of Freely Forming Conversational Groups. Human Nature 6:67–78.Google Scholar
  11. Furuichi, T. 1992 The Prolonged Estrus of Females and Factors Influencing Mating in a Wild Group of Bonobos (Pan paniscus) in Wamba, Zaire. In Topics in Primatology, Vol. 2: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation, N. Itoigawa, Y. Sugiyama, G. P. Sackett, and R. K. R. Thompson, eds. Pp. 179–190. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  12. Furuya, Y. 1957 Grooming Behavior in Wild Japanese Monkeys. Primates 1:47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodall, J. 1986 The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Goosen, C. 1987 Social Grooming in Primates. In Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 2B: Behavior, Cognition, and Motivation, G. Mitchel and J. Erwin, eds. Pp. 107–131. New York: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar
  15. Kano, T. 1992 The Last Ape: Pygmy Chimpanzee Behavior and Ecology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kaufman, I. C., and L. A. Rosenblum 1966 A Behavioral Taxonomy for Macaca nemestrina and Macaca radiata: Based on Longitudinal Observation of Family Groups in the Laboratory. Primates 7:205–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kimura, D. 1995 Speech Overlap and Long Silence among the Baka Pygmy. Journal of African Studies 46:1–19. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  18. Kojima, T. 1984 Generalization between Productive Use and Receptive Discrimination of Names in an Artificial Visual Language by a Chimpanzee. International Journal of Primatology 5:161–182.Google Scholar
  19. McGrew, W. C., and C. E. G. Tutin 1978 Evidence for Social Custom in Wild Chimpanzees? Man 13:234–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McKenna, J. 1978 Biosocial Functions of Grooming Behavior among the Common Indian Langur Monkey (Presbytis entellus). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 48:503–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morris, D. 1967 The Naked Ape. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  22. Nakamura, M., W. C. McGrew, L. F. Marchant, and T. Nishida 2000 Social Scratch: Another Custom in Wild Chimpanzees? Primates 41 (in press).Google Scholar
  23. Nishida, T. 1988 Development of Social Grooming between Mother and Offspring in Wild Chimpanzees. Folia Primatologica 50:109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 1998 Deceptive Tactic by an Adult Male Chimpanzee to Snatch a Dead Infant from Its Mother. Pan Africa News 5:13–15.Google Scholar
  25. Nishida, T., ed. 1990 The Chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains: Sexual and Life History Strategies. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  26. Oberski, I. M. 1993 A Method for the Analysis of Grooming Reciprocation at the Dyadic Level. In Current Primatology, Vol. II: Social Development, Learning and Behaviour, J. J. Roeder, B. Thierry, J. R. Anderson and N. Herrenschmidt, eds. Pp. 175–183 Strasbourg: Université Louis Pasteur.Google Scholar
  27. Parr, L. A., M. D. Matheson, I. S. Bernstein, and F. B. M. de Waal 1997 Grooming down the Hierarchy: Allogrooming in Captive Brown Capuchin Monkeys, Cebus apella. Animal Behaviour 54:361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson 1978 A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation. In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, J. Schenkein, ed. Pp. 7–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sade, D. S. 1965 Some Aspects of Parent-Offspring and Sibling Relations in a Group of Rhesus Monkeys, with a Discussion of Grooming. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 23:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Savage-Rambaugh, E. S., D. M. Rambaugh, and S. Boysen 1978 Symbolic Communication between Two Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Science 201:641–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scott, J. 1991 Social network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Sparks, J. 1967 Allogrooming in Primates: A Review. In Primate Ethology, D. Morris, ed. Pp. 148–175. London: Morrison and Gibb.Google Scholar
  33. Sugawara, K. 1984 Spatial Proximity and Bodily Contact among the Central Kalahari San. African Study Monographs 3:1–43.Google Scholar
  34. 1998 The "egalitarian" attitude in everyday conversation among the | Gui. In The Proceedings of the Khoisan Identities and Cultural Heritage Conference, A. Bank, ed. Pp. 232–240. Capetown: Institute for Historical Research.Google Scholar
  35. Takahata, Y. 1990a Adult Males’ Social Relations with Adult Female. In The Chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains: Sexual and Life History Strategies, T. Nishida, ed. Pp. 133–148. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  36. 1990b Social Relationships among Adult Males. In The Chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains: Sexual and Life History Strategies, T. Nishida, ed. Pp. 149–170. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  37. Tanaka, I., and H. Takefushi 1993 Elimination of External Parasite (Lice) Is the Primary Function of Grooming in Free-Ranging Japanese Macaques. Anthropological Science 101:187–193.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyoto UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations