Advertisement

Publishing Research Quarterly

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 417–429 | Cite as

The Emergence of Digital Course Materials in Higher Education and Their Effectiveness in Teaching and Engaging Students

  • Jessica Moro
Article

Abstract

About 20 million students are currently enrolled in colleges and universities across the country taking courses that, the majority of the time, require some sort of publisher-provided print and/or digital course materials.’ Historically, these have been provided by traditional publishing companies such as Pearson, Cengage, and McGraw-Hill, but with the increase in technology usage in higher education, more companies have emerged in this space such as OpenStax, a company that provides digital texts in high enrollment college courses for free. Usage of materials in college courses, particularly digital ones, are extremely useful and allow students to engage with their materials in different ways. By understanding how these materials are used in their courses, historically and currently, by both professors and students, one can start to understand the importance of them and what is needed now and for the future to ensure students are given the greatest chance to succeed in their courses.

Keywords

Higher education Textbooks Course materials eText Online homework system 

References

  1. 1.
    Abaci S, Quick J, Morrone A. Student engagement with e-texts: what the data tells us. Educause Review. October 9, 2017. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/10/student-engagement-with-etexts-what-the-data-tell-us.
  2. 2.
    Baldwin R. Technology in education-higher education. StateUniversity.com. http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2496/Technology-in-education-higher-education.html. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  3. 3.
    Brooks DC, Pomerantz J. ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2017. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. Educause. October 18, 2017. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/10/ecar-study-of-undergraduate-students-and-information-technology-2017.
  4. 4.
    Choy S. Findings from the condition of education 2002: nontraditional students. National Center for Education Statistics. August 2002. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002012.pdf.
  5. 5.
    CollegeBoard. Average estimated undergraduate budgets, 2017–2018. Trends in Higher Education. https://trends.collegeboard.org/college-pricing/figures-tables/average-estimated-undergraduate-budgets-2016-17. Accessed 9 Dec 2017.
  6. 6.
    EDUCAUSE Review. EDUCAUSE research snapshot: online learning attitudes. October 23, 2017. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/10/educause-research-snapshot-online-learning-attitudes.
  7. 7.
    Edutopia. Open Educational Resources (OER): resource roundup. November 4, 2013. https://edutopia.org/open-educational-resources-guide.
  8. 8.
    Kolowich, S. (2013). Textbook publishers push to provide full digital learning. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 60(25), 00095982.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee Marshall. Bookmaking: editing/design/production. 3rd ed. New York: Norton; 2004. p. 30.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Macmillan Learning. Client success specialists. http://macmillanlearning.com/catalog/page/sapling/client-success-specialists. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  11. 11.
    Mickey K, the editors of Simba Information. College course materials market trends & forecast 2016. Simba Information. February 2017. http://www.simbainformation.com.
  12. 12.
    Moro J. Thesis survey publishing professionals. Questionnaire. September 2017.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moro J. Thesis survey professors. Questionnaire. September 2017.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Association of College Stores. Infographic: course materials-student spending and preference. https://www.nacs.org/advocacynewsmedia/studentspendinginfographics.aspx. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  15. 15.
    National Center for Education Statistics. Chapter 3: postsecondary education. Digest of Education Statistics 2015. December 2016. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/ch_3.asp.
  16. 16.
    National Center for Education Statistics. Total fall enrollment in degree granting postsecondary institutions by attendance status, sex of student, and control of institution: selected years, 1947 through 2025. Digest of Educations Statistics-2015. NCES 2016-04. December 2016. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/tables/dt15_303.10.asp?referrer=report.
  17. 17.
    Paxhia S. Student attitudes toward content in higher education. Book Industry Study Group, Inc. 4, no. 2 (2014).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pomerantz J, Brooks DC. ECAR study of faculty and information technology, 2017. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. Educause. October 13, 2017. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/10/ecar-study-of-faculty-and-information-technology-2017.
  19. 19.
    TalentLMS. What’s an LMS?. https://www.talentlms.com/what-is-an-lms. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  20. 20.
    The Campus Computing Project. The 1994 national survey of desktop computing in higher education. October 1994. https://www.campuscomputing.net/survey.
  21. 21.
    The Editors of Encyclepaedia Britannica. Aelius Donatus. Encyclopadia Britannica. http://www.britannica.com/biography/Aelius-Donatus. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  22. 22.
    Wang A, Schrager A. The college lecture is dying. Good riddance. Quartz. September 6, 2017. https://qz.com/1050869/the-college-lecture-is-dying-and-good-riddance.
  23. 23.
    Williamson J. The history of distance. Distance Education. http://www.distance-education.org/Articles/The-History-of-Distance-Education-113.html. Accessed 5 July 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pace UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations