Advertisement

Publishing Research Quarterly

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 430–455 | Cite as

The Modified h-Index of Scopus: A New Way in Fair Scientometrics

  • Masoud Negahdary
  • Mahnaz Jafarzadeh
  • Ghasem Rahimi
  • Mahdia Naziri
  • Aliasghar Negahdary
Article

Abstract

The h-index of Scopus is used as an important and practical instrument in analyzing the scientific level of researchers. In this research, 6 effective items (including author’s order, quality of publication source, quality of citation source, type of citation, research scopes of the authors and the regular scope of citation source) were considered in order to increase the accuracy and equity of research and also the optimization of scientometrics. In order to find the actual impact of each item, a relation with a default coefficient was considered, and all effective items were presented after evaluating the influence of them on the desired coefficients. Here, the introduced effective factors were separately investigated for 20 Iranian authors who are randomly selected. The analysis of the results showed that by applying the effective factors, the h-index of authors was obtained on the basis of real and scientific criteria; thus, the mean of all effective factors is introduced as modified h-index. Among considered authors, the lowest reduction in h-index was 10.67% and the highest reduction was 37.25% (SD was 6.5). This reduction was obtained in comparison with their h-index of Scopus, and it demonstrates that the authors, who have less reduction in their h-index value, have more scientific and honest approach to research.

Keywords

Modern scientometrics Equitable ranking of researchers h-Index Scopus 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the Scopus editors for providing essential research data.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. 1.
    Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(46):16569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. J Inform. 2009;3(4):273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bornmann L, Daniel HD. What do we know about the h index? J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2007;58(9):1381–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braun T, Glänzel W, Schubert A. A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics. 2006;69(1):169–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Husian S, Muzamil M. Scientometric study of Indian central universities: a picture from Scopus. J Indian Libr Assoc. 2011;47(3–4):5–12.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jacsó P. The h-index, h-core citation rate and the bibliometric profile of the Scopus database. Online Inf Rev. 2011;35(3):492–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L, Walch-Solimena C, Ettl C. Mapping excellence in the geography of science: an approach based on Scopus data. J Inform. 2011;5(4):537–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burnham JF. Scopus database: a review. Biomed Dig Libr. 2006;3(1):1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Torres-Salinas D, Lopez-Cózar E, Jiménez-Contreras E. Ranking of departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: Web of Science versus Scopus. Scientometrics. 2009;80(3):761–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ra A. The 15th Razi research festival on medical sciences. J Arthropod Borne Diseases. 2008;2(2):1.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tyrrell PN, Moody AR, Moody JOC, Ghiam N. Departmental h-index: evidence for publishing less? Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017;68(1):10–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gaster N, Gaster M. A critical assessment of the h-index. BioEssays. 2012;34(10):830–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khan NR, Thompson CJ, Taylor DR, Gabrick KS, Choudhri AF, Boop FR, Klimo P. Part II: should the h-index be modified? An analysis of the m-quotient, contemporary h-index, authorship value, and impact factor. World Neurosurg. 2013;80(6):766–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lacasse JR, Hodge DR, Bean KF. Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the h-index. Res Soc Work Pract. 2011;21(5):599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bertoli-Barsotti L, Lando T. The h-index as an almost-exact function of some basic statistics. Scientometrics. 2017;113:1209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gray R, Hassanein E, Thompson DR. Journal editors and their h-index. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(9):2031–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Asnafi S, Gunderson T, McDonald RJ, Kallmes DF. Association of H-index of editorial board members and impact factor among radiology journals. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(2):119–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bartneck C, Kokkelmans S. Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis. Scientometrics. 2010;87(1):85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics. 2006;69(1):131–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang C-T. The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(5):e5429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kay J, Memon M, de Sa D, Simunovic N, Duong A, Karlsson J, Ayeni OR. The h-index of editorial board members correlates positively with the impact factor of sports medicine journals. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117694024.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barnes C. The h-index debate: an introduction for librarians. J Acad Librariansh. 2017;43(6):487–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masoud Negahdary
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Mahnaz Jafarzadeh
    • 1
  • Ghasem Rahimi
    • 1
    • 4
  • Mahdia Naziri
    • 1
  • Aliasghar Negahdary
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Research and DevelopmentLexis PublisherTehranIran
  2. 2.Yazd Cardiovascular Research CenterShahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesYazdIran
  3. 3.Nanomedicine and Nanobiology Research CenterShiraz University of Medical SciencesShirazIran
  4. 4.Young Researchers and Elite Club, Marvdasht BranchIslamic Azad UniversityMarvdashtIran

Personalised recommendations