Advertisement

The Potentials of Open Access Initiative and the Development of Institutional Repositories in Nigeria: Implications for Scholarly Communication

  • Anthonia Nwamaka Ejikeme
  • Ifeanyi Jonas EzemaEmail author
Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

This study examined the state of open access institutional repositories in Nigeria. Expository review of literature was used to x-ray the state of the art, while descriptive informetrics was used to extract informetric data from two major repository directories (Registry of Open Access Repositories and Directory of Open Access Repositories). Findings revealed that Nigeria has twenty repositories from 14 out of about 153 universities in the country; majority of the repositories (70%) use DSpace as archiving software. The growth of repositories in the country has been slow, and the dominant contents of the repositories are journal articles, theses, and dissertations. While the study exposes the weaknesses of Nigeria universities in exploring the potentials of institutional repositories in wider dissemination their scientific productivity, it challenges government and other stakeholders to develop sustainable framework for development of repositories in the country.

Keywords

Open access Institutional repositories Scholarly communication Nigeria Research communication Collection development 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Adewumi AO, Ikhu-Omoregbe NA. Institutional repositories: feature, architectural design and implementation technologies. J Comput. 2010;2(8):1–5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akintunde SA. Institutional repository: the university of jos experience. Paper presented at the 2nd international workshop on open access, with the theme: “open access: maximising research quality and impact”, jointly organized by Electronic Information for Libraries (eIFL.net), Nigerian University Libraries Consortium (NULIB) and the Department of Library and Information Science, Ahmadu Bello University (A.B.U.), Zaria, held at A.B.U., Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria, 2nd–4th November 2009 (2009).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akpokodje VN, Akpokodje ET. Availability and utilization of institutional repositories as Indicators to institutional web ranking. Eur J Comput Sci Inform Tech. 2015;3(2):29–40. Retrieved on 4 Jan 2019 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311614898.
  4. 4.
    Alotaibi R, Hosseinian-Fa A. Adoption of social media as communication channels in government agencies. Cloud Comput Technol Connect Gov. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8629-8.ch003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Antelman K. Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? Coll Res Libr. 2004;65(5):372–82.  https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.65.5.372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anton B. Issues and impacts of the changing nature of scientific communication. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80(6):403–10.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200306000-00001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chima JN, Ugwuoke NJ, Ogwo U. Implementing Institutional repository in Nigerian universities: status, challenges, prospects, and the role of librarians and libraries. Int J Appl Technol Libr Inf Manag (JATLIM). 2015;1(1):38–40.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christopher MM, Young KM. Awareness of “predatory” open-access journals among prospective veterinary and medical authors attending scientific writing workshops. Front Vet Sci. 2015;2:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2015.00022.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Craw J. Open doors and open minds: What faculty authors can do to ensure open access to their work through institution. 2008. SPARC/Science Commons. Retrieved on 19 Oct 2008 from http://arl.org/sparc.
  10. 10.
    Craig ID, Plume AM, McVeigh ME, Pringle J, Amin M. Do open access journals have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. J Inform. 2007;1:239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drake MA, Institutional repository: hidden treasure. Inf Today. 2004;12(5):1–7. Retrieved on 5 July 2016 from http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/may04/drake.shtml.
  12. 12.
    Ezeani CN, Ezema IJ. Digitizing institutional research output of University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Libr Philos Pract. 2011. Retrieved on 3 Jan 2014 from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/565/.
  13. 13.
    Ezema I.J. Building open access institutional repositories for global visibility of Nigeria scholarly publications. Libr Rev. 2011;60(6):473–485. www.emeraldinsight.com/0024-2535.htm.
  14. 14.
    Ezema IJ. Local contents and the development of open access institutional repositories in Nigeria university libraries: Challenges, strategies and scholarly implications. Libr Hi Tech. 2013;31(2):323–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ezema IJ, Okafor VN. Open access institutional repositories in Nigeria academic libraries: Advocacy and issues in scholarly communication. Libr Collect Acquis Tech Serv. 2016;39(3–4):45–58 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14649055.2016.1176842.
  16. 16.
    Ezema IJ, Onyancha OB. Status of Africa in the global open access directories: implications for global visibility of African scholarly research. In: 4th CODESRIA conference on electronic publishing: open access movement and the future of African knowledge economy, Dakar, Senegal March 30–April 1 2016. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.codesria.org/spip.php?article2564&lang=en.
  17. 17.
    Gbaje ES. Implementing a national virtual library for higher institutions in Nigeria. LIBRES Libr Inf Sci Res Electron J. 2007;17(2) Retrieved on 5 Feb 10 from http://libres.curtin.edu.au//ibres17ne/index.htm.
  18. 18.
    Gideon EC. A research paper prepared for the international development research centre (IDRC) Canada. 2008.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gosh SB, Das AK. Open access and Institutional repositories a developing country perspective: a case study of India. IFLA J. 2007;33(3):229–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Graham T. Scholarly communication. Serials. 2000;13(1):3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Halliday L. Scholarly communication, scholarly publication and the status of emerging formats. J Inf. 2001;6(4):3–10.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harnad S, Brod T. Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Mag. 2004;10(6). Retrieved on 7 Jan from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html.
  23. 23.
    Kling R, Callahan E. Electronic journals, the internet, and scholarly communication. Annu Rev Inform Sci. 2003;37:127–77. Retreved on July 12 2017 from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/aris.1440370105.
  24. 24.
    Kling R, Mckim G. Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1999;50(10):890–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McKay M. Improving access to scholarly research in Africa: open access initiatives. Serials. 2011;24(3):251–254. http://serials.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/24251/. Accessed 3 Nov 2015.
  26. 26.
    Napoli P. The impact of electronic publication on scholarly communication. Fordham: Association of American University Press, Inc.; 2005. p. 3–10.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    National Universities Commission. List of Nigeria universities. 2017. http://nuc.edu.ng/. Accessed 13 April 2017.
  28. 28.
    Nkiko C, Bolu C, Michael-Onuoha H (2014). Managing a sustainable institutional repository: The covenant university experience. Samaru journal of information studies, Vol. (1and2). Accessed on 17 March 2017 Available at http://www.researchgate.net/publication/281116700.
  29. 29.
    Nwagwu WE. Open access initiatives in Africa – structures, incentives and disincentives. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2013;19(1):3–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Okeagu G, Okeagu B. Networking and resource sharing in library and information services: the case for consortium building. Inform Soc Just. 2008;1(2):253–62. Retrieved on 7 Jan 2019 from http://eprints.londonmet.ac.uk/82/1/InformationSocietyAndJustice_v1n2_p255-262.pdf.
  31. 31.
    Okoye MO, Ejikeme AN. Open access, institutional repositories, and scholarly publishing: the role of librarians in South Eastern Nigeria. Libr Philos Pract. 2011. Retrieved on 5 June 2016 from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/612/.
  32. 32.
    Onyancha OB. Open research data in Sub-Saharan African countries: a bibliometric study using data citation index. Publ Res Q. 2016;32(3):227–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9463-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Open Society Institute. Budapest open access initiative. 2003. Retrieved on 4 Jan 2019 from http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/links/pdf/introduction/0.28.pdf.
  34. 34.
    Shelton RD, Ali HB. Scientometric secrets of efficient countries: Turkey, Greece, Poland and Slovakia. In: Proceedings of Collnet Conference, Istanbul, Sept 2011. 2011. http://itri2.org/.
  35. 35.
    Shen C, Björk B-C. Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med. 2015;13(230):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shrivastava R, Mahajan P. Influence of social networking sites on scholarly communication: a study using literature in Artificial Intelligence. J Libr Inf Sci. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616678309.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Swan A. Chapter 1: Overview of scholarly communication. 2006. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/262427/1/asj1.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2017.
  38. 38.
    Swan AP, Brown SN. JISC/OSI journal authors survey report. Truro: Key Perspective; 2004. http://cogprints.org/4125/1/JISCOAreport1.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2017.
  39. 39.
    Times Higher Education. World University Rankings 2014–2015. 2015. Retrieved on 17 May 2013 from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/worldranking. Accessed on 1 Oct 2015.
  40. 40.
    Turk N. Citation impact of open access journals. New Libr World. 2008;109(1/2):65–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074800810846010. Accessed 10 Sept 2015.
  41. 41.
    Utulu SCA, Bolarinwa O. Open access initiatives adoption by Nigerian academics. Libr Rev. 2009;58(9):660–669. www.emeraldinsight.com/0024-2535.htm. Accessed 1 Oct 2015.
  42. 42.
    Van de Sompel H, Payette S, Erickson J, Lagoze C, Warner S. Rethinking scholarly communication: building the system that scholars deserve. D-Lib Mag. 2004;10(9). Retreived on 6 May 2017 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september04/vandesompel/09vandesompel.html
  43. 43.
    Velterophas J. Open access and publishing. The e-resources management handwork. 2008. United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Webster J, Butler B. The good, the muddle and the predatory: open access journals in marine & aquatic sciences. Presented at the 40th IAMSLIC Conference, Noumea, New Caledonia, September 2014. 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthonia Nwamaka Ejikeme
    • 1
  • Ifeanyi Jonas Ezema
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Nnamdi Azikiwe LibraryUniversity of NigeriaNsukkaNigeria
  2. 2.Department of Information ScienceUniversity of South AfricaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations