Advertisement

Publishing Research Quarterly

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 132–141 | Cite as

The Open Access in the Context of the Globalizing World

  • Nikos Koutras
Article

Abstract

Globalization and the internet are intrinsically linked. This obvious fact has major implications for how the publishing industry will be modified in the foreseeable future. This change may be technologically driven but there is a place for intellectual debate about the appropriate regulation of the field. This requires an examination of the commercial and moral claims of the authors or creators and the conventional publishers vis a vis those of the end users both nationally and internationally. This analysis will enable me to make an argument about the importance of open access as an appropriate governance mechanism for both protection and distribution of information in the international arena. In addition, this paper argues that in a globalized world justice and social cohesion requires commercial Multinational corporations (MNCs) to act responsibly and ethically. Most of the big publishing houses are such MNCs and if open access repositories (OARs) are to be relevant such publishing houses will have to embrace the concept. Overall, I will use the concept of corporate social responsibility to make the argument that it is logical and feasible that publishing MNCs can modify their business practices and adopt OARs.

Keywords

Globalization Intellectual property Publishers Open access 

References

  1. 1.
    Andersen B. If “intellectual property rights” is the answer, what is the question? Revisiting the patent controversies. Econ Innov New Technol. 2004;13:417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Archibugi D, Filippetti A. The globalization of intellectual property rights: four learned lessons and four theses (May 2010). http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21930/
  3. 3.
    Balkin JM. The future of free expression in a digital age (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1335055, Social Science Research Network, 29 January 2009). http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1335055
  4. 4.
    Chang HJ. Kicking away the ladder: development strategy in historical perspective. 1st ed. London: Anthem Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chantavaridou E. Open access and institutional repositories in Greece: progress so far. OCLC Syst Serv Int Digit Libr Perspect. 2009;25:47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Finch J. Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications (Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, 2012). http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Finch-Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf
  7. 7.
    Kingsley D. Busting the top five myths about open access publishing. The conversation. 2013. http://theconversation.com/busting-the-top-five-myths-about-open-access-publishing-14792
  8. 8.
    Koutras N, Bottis M. Institutional repositories of open access: a paradigm of innovation and changing in educational politics. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;106:1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lawrence L. Free culture: the nature and future of creativity. Baltimore: Penguin Books; 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poynder R. Open and shut? Open access: springer tightens rules on self-archiving. http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/open-access-springer-tightens-rules-on.html
  11. 11.
    Prosser DC. From here to there: a proposed mechanism for transforming journals from closed to open access. Learn Publ. 2003;16:163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Samuelson P. Toward a “new deal” for copyright in an information age. Mich Law Rev. 2002;100:1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sell SK. Private power, public law: the globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suber P. Nine questions for hybrid journal programs. http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4552044
  16. 16.
    The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. Lack of clarity over open access is ‘unacceptable’—RCUK must clarify and monitor its implementation closely—News from Parliament. UK Parliament. 2013. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/science-and-technology-committee/news/open-access-report-published/
  17. 17.
    The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. Science and technology committee (Lords). UK Parliament. 2013. http://www.parliament.uk/hlscience
  18. 18.
    Willinsky J. The nine flavors of open access scholarly publishing. J Postgrad Med. 2003;49:263.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Willinsky J. The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Willinsky J. The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science. First Monday. 2005;10. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1265

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations