Abstract
College administrators and faculty are struggling to make smart decisions in the midst of a barrage of information. Some of what they’re hearing and reading is confusing, some of it is exaggerated and some of it is just wrong. Changes in digital course materials are moving forward swiftly, but not at warp speed. The challenge is to navigate digital opportunities without losing sight of learning outcomes, costs and wear and tear on students, teachers and institutions. A nimble but careful move forward requires dependable partnerships, fresh thinking and a genuine understanding of the risks and rewards. To help make sense of the digital transition, this is an assessment of how course materials will evolve and Follett Higher Education Group’s predictions for the near- and long-term future of digital learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birk S. Interview by author. Phone interview. Fort-Wayne, Indiana. Nov. 2, 2011.
Dahlstrom E, de Boor T, Grunwald P, Vockley M, with a foreword by Diana Oblinger. The ECAR National Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2011 (Research Report). Boulder, CO:EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
Follett Higher Education Group internal research. 2011. N.p.: n.p., n.d.
Gary S. Future of course materials (presentation, internal meeting at Follett Higher Education Group, Oakbrook, IL, October 11, 2011).
Roth J, Barnes C, Francesco N, McCarthy D, Robinson J, Stites-Doe S. eTextbooks in higher education: practical findings to guide the industry panel discussion, February 15, 2011.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McFadden, C. Are Textbooks Dead? Making Sense of the Digital Transition. Pub Res Q 28, 93–99 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-012-9266-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-012-9266-3