Advertisement

Five Ways to Improve Constructionist Craft in Social Problems Inquiries: Notes from an Apprenticeship

  • Peter R. Ibarra
Article

Abstract

John Kitsuse’s views about the prospects for the constructionist analysis of social problems are distilled in summary form. As a mentor to the present author, Kitsuse expressed his appreciation for the continued growth and development of the tradition of sociological analysis that that he was instrumental in developing, while also believing that the perspective had been sidetracked in ways that were reminiscent of the morass that eventually undermined what was commonly called “labeling theory,” also known as the “societal reaction” perspective on deviance. Kitsuse’s positive vision for the constructionist tradition is framed in terms of the craft that imbues this mode of analysis with its vigor and perspicacity.

Keywords

John Kitsuse Social constructionism Ethnographic research Methodology 

References

  1. Bittner, E. (1967). The police on skid row: A study of peacekeeping. American Sociological Review, 32(5), 699–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cicourel, A. V. (1968). The social Organization of Juvenile Justice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. W. (1992). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Del Rosso, J. (2011). The textual mediation of denial: Congress, Abu Ghraib, and the construction of an isolated incident. Social Problems, 58(2), 165–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Emerson, R. M. (1987). Four ways to improve the craft of fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 16(1), 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2012). Don’t argue with the members. The American Sociologist., 43, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holstein, J. A. (2009). Defining deviance: John Kitsuse's modest agenda. The American Sociologist., 40(1/2), 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2003). A constructionist analytics for social problems. in. J.a. Holstein and G. miller (Eds.), Challenges and Choices: Constructionist Perspectives on Social Problems (pp. 187–208). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Ibarra, P. R., & Adorjan, M. (2018). Social constructionism. In J. A. Trevino (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook on social problems (pp. 279–300). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ibarra, P. R., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1993). Vernacular constituents of moral discourse: An interactionist proposal for the study of social problems. In J. A. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Reconsidering social constructionism: Debates in social problems theory (pp. 25–58). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Jenness, V. (1990). From sex as sin to sex as work: COYOTE and the reorganization of prostitution as a social problem. Social Problems, 37(3), 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jenness, V. (1993). Making it work: The prostitutes’ rights movement in perspective. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  14. Katz, J. (2009). John Kitsuse: A sociologist in everyday life. The American Sociologist, 40, 36–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kitsuse, A. (2009). Friends along the way. The American Sociologist, 40, 15.20.Google Scholar
  16. Kitsuse, J. I., & Cicourel, A. V. (1963). A note on the uses of official statistics. Social Problems, 11(2), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kitsuse, J. I., & Spector, M. (1975). Social problems and deviance: Some parallel issues. Social Problems, 22(5), 584–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loseke, D.R. 1992. The battered woman and shelters: The social construction of wife abuse . Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mills, C. W. (1943). The professional ideology of social pathologists. The American Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pollner. (1978). Constitutive and mundane versions of labeling theory. Human Studies, 1(1), 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rains, P. (1975). Imputations of deviance: A retrospective essay on the labeling perspective. Social Problems, 23(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schneider, J.W. 1985. Social problems theory: The constructionist view. In R. Turner (Ed.) Annual Review of Sociology (pp. 209–29). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 11, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spector, M. (2018). Constructing social problems: Forty years later. The American Sociologist.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9391-3.
  24. Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1977). Constructing social problems. Cummings: Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
  25. Sudnow, D. (1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems, 12(3), 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Woolgar, S., & Pawluch, D. (1985). Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations. Social Problems, 32(3), 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminology, Law, and JusticeUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations