Advertisement

The American Sociologist

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 64–79 | Cite as

Relations and Relationships: Clarifying the Terms of the ‘New’ Relational Economic Sociology

  • Dustin S. Stoltz
Article
  • 324 Downloads

Abstract

In economic sociology, relations and relationships have emerged as central yet poorly specified concepts. In this paper, I clarify these terms in a positive critique of the current state of the field. I then consider the ways in which the proposed framework can help analysts to bridge the divide between economics and sociology. Armed with techniques derived from formal network analysis, the new economic sociology offered the first sustained foray into economic territory, but sociological skeptics remain unsatisfied. Two broad rejoinders to this network-analytic approach emerged in the last two decades, but both correctives, nevertheless, leave the divide intact. In the last decade, however, a new paradigm is coalescing under the rubric of “relational economic sociology. While showing promise, it furthers the confusion surrounding the key concepts of “relations” and “relationships.” The proposed framework provides a foundation for constructive dialogue among the different traditions which constitute this new paradigm.

Keywords

Economic sociology Relational sociology Economics Relations Relationships 

Notes

Acknowledgements

An early version of this paper was presented during the fall of 2015 at The Culture Workshop of the University of Notre Dame, and I would like to thank all participants for their time and insight. I am also very grateful for the many discussions with Omar Lizardo about all things theory, with Lyn Spillman and Aaron Pitluck about economic sociology, and with David Gibson about social networks.

References

  1. Aspers, P. (2011). Markets. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, W. (1990). Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 589–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, W. (2000). The great disciplinary divide. Advances in Strategic Management, 17, 367–374.Google Scholar
  4. Bandelj, N. (2002). Embedded economies: Social relations as determinants of foreign direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe. Social Forces, 81(2), 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandelj, N. (2012). Relational work and economic sociology. Politics & Society, 40(2), 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandelj, N. (2015). Thinking About Social Relations in Economy as Relational Work.” In Aspers, P., & Dodd, N. (Eds.), Re-Imagining Economic Sociology (pp. 227–251). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beckert, J. (1996). What is sociological about economic sociology? Uncertainty and the embeddedness of economic action. Theory and Society, 25, 803–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckert, J. (2003). Economic sociology and embeddedness: How shall we conceptualize economic action? Journal of Economic Issues, 37(3), 769–787.Google Scholar
  9. Beckert, J. (2006). Interpenetration Versus Embeddedness. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65(1), 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beckert, J. (2013). Imagined Futures: Fictional expectations in the economy. Theory and Society, 42(3), 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined Futures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (2011). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Open Road Media.Google Scholar
  13. Boisot, M., & Child, J. (1988). “The iron law of fiefs: Bureaucratic failure and the problem of governance in the Chinese economic reforms.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(4), 507–527.Google Scholar
  14. Boorman, S. A., & White, H. C. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. II. Role structures. American Journal of Sociology, 81(6), 1384–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Callon, M. (1998). Introduction: The embeddedness of economic Markets in Economics. The Sociological Review, 46(S1), 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Calnitsky, D. (2014). Economic sociology as disequilibrium economics: A contribution to the critique of the new economic sociology: Economic sociology as disequilibrium economics. The Sociological Review, 62(3), 565–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Camic, C. (1987). The making of a method: A historical reinterpretation of the early Parsons. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chan, C. (2009). Invigorating the content in social embeddedness: An ethnography of life insurance transactions in China. American Journal of Sociology, 115(3), 712–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dequech, D. (2003). Cognitive and cultural embeddedness: Combining institutional economics and economic sociology. Journal of Economic Issues, 37(2), 461–470.Google Scholar
  20. Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411–1454.Google Scholar
  21. Fourcade, M. (2007). Theories of markets and theories of society. The American Behavioral Scientist, 50(8), 1015–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuhse, J. (2009). The meaning structure of social networks. Sociological Theory, 27(1), 51–73.Google Scholar
  23. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Granovetter, M. (1990). The old and the new economic sociology: A history and an agenda. Pp. 89–112 in Beyond the marketplace: Rethinking economy and society.Google Scholar
  26. Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic institutions as social constructions: A framework for analysis. Acta sociologica, 35(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Granovetter, M. (2017). Society and economy: Framework and principles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gemici, K. (2007). Karl Polanyi and the antinomies of embeddedness. Socio-Economic Review, 6(1), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris, M. (2001). The rise of anthropological theory: A history of theories of culture. AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  30. Holland, D., & Quinn, N. (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Ingham, G. (1996). Some recent changes in the relationship between economics and sociology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20(2), 243–275.Google Scholar
  32. Knorr-Cetina, K. (2003). From pipes to scopes: The flow architecture of financial markets. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 4(2), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knorr-Cetina, K. (2004). Capturing markets? A review Essay on Harrison White on producer markets. Socio-Economic Review, 2(1), 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krippner, G. (2002). The elusive market: Embeddedness and the paradigm of economic sociology. Theory and Society, 30(6), 775–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krippner, G., Granovetter, M., Block, F., Biggart, N., Beamish, T., Hsing, Y. T., Hart, G., Arrighi, G., Mendell, M., Hall, J., Burawoy, M., Vogel, S., & O’Riain, S. (2004). Polanyi symposium: A conversation on embeddedness. Socio-Economic Review, 2, 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lizardo, O., Mowry, R., Sepulvado, B., Stoltz, D., Taylor, M., Van Ness, J., & Wood, M. (2016). What are dual process models? Implications for cultural analysis in sociology. Sociological Theory., 34(4), 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MacKenzie, D. (2003). Long-term capital Management and the sociology of arbitrage. Economy and Society, 32(3), 349–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin, J. (2009). Social Structures. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Martin, J. (2014). Thinking through theory. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  40. McLean, P., & Padgett, J. (1997). Was Florence a perfectly competitive market? Transactional evidence from the renaissance. Theory and Society, 26(2), 209–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moody, J., & White, D. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ouchi, W. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parsons, T. (1991). The early essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Penn, R. (1982). Review: Roderick Martin, new technology and industrial relations in fleet street. The Sociological Review, 30(4), 698–699.Google Scholar
  45. Penn, R. (1990). History and sociology in the new economic sociology: A discourse in search of a method. In S. Kendrick, P. Straw, & D. McCrone (Eds.), Interpreting the Past, Understanding the Present, Explorations in Sociology. (pp. 165–76) New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Pike, K. (1967). Etic and emic standpoints for the description of behavior. In Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior (pp. 37–72). Paris: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
  47. Podolny, J. (1994). Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 458–483.Google Scholar
  48. Podolny, J., & Morton, F. (1999). Social status, entry and predation: The case of British shipping cartels 1879–1929. Journal of Industrial Economics, 47(1), 41–67.Google Scholar
  49. Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  50. Portes, A. (2010). Economic sociology: A systematic Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Powell, W. (2003). Neither market nor hierarchy. In M. Handel (Ed.), The sociology of organizations: classic, contemporary, and critical readings (pp. 315–330). Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  53. Rivera, M., Soderstrom, S., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robbins, L. (1932). The nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan & CoGoogle Scholar
  55. Rossman, G. (2014). Obfuscatory relational work and disreputable exchange. Sociological Theory, 32(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Shore, B. (1996). Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sik, E., & Wallace, C. (1999). The development of open-air Markets in East-Central Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(4), 697–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smelser, N. and R. Swedberg. 1994. “The Sociological Perspective on the Economy.” in The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, A. (1838). An Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. T. Nelson.Google Scholar
  61. Spillman, L. (1999). Enriching exchange: Cultural dimensions of markets. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(4), 1047–1071.Google Scholar
  62. Spillman, L. (2012). Solidarity in strategy: Making business meaningful in American trade associations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stark, D. (2000). For a sociology of worth. Keynote Address for the Meetings of the European Association of Evolutionary Political Economy (November 2–4, 2000), Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  64. Stark, D. (2011). The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Stigler, G. (1983). The Organization of Industry. University of Chicago Press Economics Books.Google Scholar
  66. Swedberg, R. (1984). Review Essay : Economic sociology in transition: A review Essay. Acta Sociologica, 27(4), 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Swedberg, R. (2015). Theorizing in economic sociology. In Aspers, P., & Dodd, N. (Eds.), Re-Imagining Economic Sociology (pp. 34–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Swedberg, R., Himmelstrand, U., & Brulin, G. (1987). The paradigm of economic sociology: Premises and promises. Theory and society, 16(2), 169–213.Google Scholar
  69. Taylor, J. (2003). Linguistic categorization. OUP Oxford.Google Scholar
  70. Velthuis, O. (1999). The changing relationship between economic sociology and institutional economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(4), 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wherry, F. (2006) The Social Sources of Authenticity in Global Handicraft Markets: Evidence from Northern Thailand. Journal of Consumer Culture, 6(1), 5–32.Google Scholar
  73. White, H. (1958). Atomic force constants of copper from Feynman’s theorem. Physical Review, 112(4), 1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. White, H. (1961). Management conflict and Sociometric structure. American Journal of Sociology, 67(2), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. White, H. (1981). Where do Markets come from. Advances in Strategic Management, 17(2), 323–350.Google Scholar
  76. White, H. (1992). Identity and control: A structural theory of social action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  77. White, H. (2004). Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  78. White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 730–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Whitford, J. (2012). Waltzing, relational work, and the construction (or not) of collaboration in manufacturing industries. Politics & Society, 40(2), 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York, 26–30.Google Scholar
  81. Zafirovski, M. (2013) What is the main significance of economic for sociological theory? The American Sociologist, 44(2), 177–197.Google Scholar
  82. Zafirovski, M. (2016) Toward economic sociology/socio-economics? Sociological components in contemporary economics and implications for sociology. The American Sociologist, 47(1), 56–80.Google Scholar
  83. Zelizer, V. (1988). Beyond the polemics on the market: Establishing a theoretical and empirical agenda. Sociological Forum, 3(4), 614–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zelizer, V. (2000). The purchase of intimacy. Law & Social Inquiry, 25(3), 817–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zelizer, V. (2007a). Pasts and Futures of economic sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(8), 1056–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zelizer, V. (2007b). The purchase of intimacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Zelizer, V. (2010). Economic lives: How culture shapes the economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zelizer, V. (2012). How I became a relational economic sociologist and what does that mean? Politics & Society, 40(2), 145–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zuckerman, E. (2004). Comment on Zajac and Westphal, ASR, June 2004: Towards the social reconstruction of an interdisciplinary turf war. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 458–465.Google Scholar
  90. Zukin, S, DiMaggio P. (1990). Structures of capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. CUP Archive.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations