Advertisement

The American Sociologist

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 16–36 | Cite as

The Rise of Rational Choice Theory as a Scientific/Intellectual Movement in Sociology

  • Steven L. FoyEmail author
  • Cyrus Schleifer
  • Edward A. Tiryakian
Article

Abstract

How did Rational Choice Theory (RCT), traditionally rejected by sociologists for its economic individualism, rise rapidly in the 1980s and the 1990s to theoretical and institutional prominence within sociology? Drawing on Frickel and Gross’ (American Sociological Association, 70(2):204–232 2005) framework for the emergence of scientific/intellectual movements (SIMs), we argue that RCT rose to prominence in sociology in conjunction with: 1) high status actors’ criticism of the previously dominant paradigm, structural functionalism; 2) favorable structural conditions that provided entrepreneurial access to key resources; 3) proliferation through micromobilization contexts; and 4) the ability of those espousing RCT for sociology to draw on dominant cultural motifs outside of academia. The rise of RCT in American sociology provides a case study for how scientific/intellectual movements can find an audience in academic contexts that are predisposed to oppose them.

Keywords

SIMs Rational choice theory Sociology of knowledge Resources Cultural context 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Harry Dahms, Lisa Keister, Larry Nichols, Richard Swedberg, and Steve Vaisey for their helpful feedback on previous versions of the manuscript.

References

  1. Allen, S. (2014). Television in the United States. Encyclopedia Britannica. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1513870/Television-in-the-United-States/283635/The-era-of-the-miniseries#toc283636. Accessed 12 Sept 2014.
  2. Amadae, S. M. (2003). Rationalizing capitalist democracy: The cold war origins of rational choice liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. American Sociological Association (2016). Distinguished Scholarly Book ASA Award. http://cfd153.cfdynamics.com/about/awards/book.cfm. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  4. American Sociological Association Section on Rationality and Society (2014). Cumulative listing of section officers: Rationality and society (33). https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxyYXRpb25hbGl0eWFuZHNvY2lldHlzZWN0aW9ufGd4OjJkMWNhYjBlMjJhNzJmYQ. Accesed 1 Sept 2015.
  5. Appelrouth, S., & Edles, L. D. (2008). Classical and contemporary sociological theory: Text and readings. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  6. Appleby, J. (2010). The relentless revolution: A history of capitalism. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  7. Bailey, K. D. (1991). Alternative procedures for Macrosociological theorizing. Quality & Quantity, 25, 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnes, T. J., & Sheppard, E. (1992). Is there a place for the rational actor? A geographical critique of the rational choice paradigm. Economic Geography, 68(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron, J. N., & Hannan, M. T. (1994). The impact of economics on contemporary sociology. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(3), 1111–1146.Google Scholar
  10. Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Black, M. (Ed.). (1961). The social theories of Talcott Parsons: a critical examination. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Boudon, R. (1998). Limitations of rational choice theory. American Journal of Sociology, 104(3), 817–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowler, K. (2013). Blessed: a history of the American prosperity gospel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyd, W. L., Crowson, R. L., & Geel, Y. (1995). Rational choice theory and the politics of education. In D. H. Layton (Ed.), The study of educational politics (pp. 127–146) . Washington, DC: Falmer Press.Association Politics of Education, and Jay D. ScribnerGoogle Scholar
  15. Busch, A. E. (2005). In P. Kengor & P. Schweizer (Eds.), The Reagan presidency: assessing the man and his legacy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..Google Scholar
  16. Business Week. (1983). Computer shock hits the office. Business Week, August 8, 46–49, 52–53.Google Scholar
  17. Calhoun, C. (1998). Explanation in historical sociology: Narrative, general theory, and historically specific theory. American Journal of Sociology, 104(3), 846–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cave, R., (Ed.) (1983). Time Magazine. January 3, 1983: Cover.Google Scholar
  19. Chai, S. (2001). Choosing an identity: a general model of preference and belief formation. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chaves, M. (1995). On the rational choice approach to religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34(1), 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark, J., (Ed.) (1996). James S. Coleman. London and Washington, D.C.: Palmer Press (Taylor & Francis Group).Google Scholar
  22. Clarke, R. V. G., & Cornish, D. B. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Coleman, J. S. (1966). Individual interests and collective action. In G. Tullock (Ed.), Papers on non-market decision-making (pp. 49–62). Charlottesville: Thomas Jefferson Center for Political Economy, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  24. Coleman, J. S. (1986). Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1309–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coleman, J. S. (1993). The impact of Gary Becker's work on sociology. Acta Sociologica, 36(3), 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coleman, J. S., & Fararo, T. J. (Eds.). (1992). Rational choice theory: Advocacy and critique. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  27. Collins, R. (1990). Conflict theory and the advance of macro-historical sociology. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Frontiers of social theory: The new syntheses. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Collins, R. (1994). Four sociological traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Computer History Museum. (2014a). Computers for Everybody. http://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/personal-computers/17/298. Accessed 16 Sept 2014.
  30. Computer History Museum. (2014b). The IBM PC. http://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/personal-computers/17/301. Accessed 16 Sept 2014.
  31. Computer History Museum. (2014c). What Was the First PC? http://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/personal-computers/17/297. Accessed 16 Sept 2014.
  32. Cook, K. (1982). Network Structure from an exchange perspective. In N. Lin & P. Marsden (Eds.), Social Structure and network analysis (pp. 177–199). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Cook, K. S., Emerson, R. M., Gillmore, M. R., & Yamagishi, T. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. American Journal of Sociology, 89(2), 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Coons, J. (1978). Education by choice: the case for family control. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Crain, A. (2007). Ford, Carter, and deregulation in the 1970s. Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, 5, 413–447.Google Scholar
  36. Davis, K. (1959). The myth of functional analysis as a special method in sociology and anthropology. American Sociological Review, 24(6), 757–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Demerath III, N. J. (1995). Rational paradigms, A-rational religion, and the debate over secularization. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34(1), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dudar, H. (1979). Louis Rukeyser and his Socko stock-market show. Chicago Tribune Magazine, September 20, pp. 29-30, 35-37.Google Scholar
  39. Eisenstadt, S. N., & Curelaru, M. (1976). The form of sociology: Paradigms and crises. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Ellison, C. G. (1995). Rational choice explanations of individual religious behavior: Notes on the problem of social embeddedness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34(1), 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Elster, J. (1982). The case for methodological individualism. Theory and Society, 11(4), 453–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Endlich, L. (2000). Goldman Sachs: The culture of success. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  43. Feagin, J. R., Vera, H., & Ducey, K. (2016). Liberation sociology (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Folkenflik, D. (2013). Murdoch’s world: The last of the old media empires. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  45. Frickel, S., & Gross, N. (2005). A general theory of scientific/intellectual movements. American Sociological Association, 70(2), 204–232.Google Scholar
  46. Gabrenya, W. K., Kung, M., & Chen, L. (2006). Understanding the Taiwan indigenous psychology movement: a sociology of science approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(6), 597–622. doi: 10.1177/0022022106290480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gibbs, J. P. (1990). Foundations of social theory (book). Social Forces, 69(2), 625–633.Google Scholar
  48. Goldstone, J. A. (1998). Initial conditions, general Laws, path dependence, and explanation in historical sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 104(3), 829–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis of western sociology. New York: Basic Books, Inc..Google Scholar
  50. Green, D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Gross, N., & Simmons, Solon (Eds.). (2014). Professors and their politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Hechter, M. (1983). The Microfoundations of macrosociology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Hechter, M., & Kanazawa, S. (1997). Sociological rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Heckathorn, D. (2001). Sociological Rational Choice. In G. Ritzer & B. Smart (Eds.), Handbook of social theory (pp. 273–284). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Heidegren, C., & Lundberg, H. (2010). Towards a sociology of philosophy. Acta Sociologica, 53(1), 3–18. doi: 10.1177/0001699309357831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Henley, M. M. (2015). Alternative and authoritative knowledge: the role of certification for defining expertise among doulas. Social Currents, 2(3), 260–279. doi: 10.1177/2329496515589851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Henning, P. J. (2012). Behind the Crackdown on Insider Training. http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/03/01/behind-the-crackdown-on-insider-trading/?_r=0. Accessed 12 Nov 2016.
  58. Hindman, D. B., & Wiegand, K. (2008). The big Three’s prime-time decline: a technological and social context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(1), 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hirsch, J. A. (2012). The little book of stock market cycles. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  60. Homans, G. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology 63(6), 597–606.Google Scholar
  61. Homans, G. (1964). Bringing Men Back In. American Sociological Review, 29(6), 809–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Homans, G. (1987). Certainties and doubts: Collected papers, 1962–1985. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction, Inc..Google Scholar
  63. Horowitz, I. L. (1994). The decomposition of sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Huaco, G. A. (1986). Ideology and general theory: the case of sociological functionalism. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 28(1), 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Huber, J. (1997). Rational choice models in sociology. The American Sociologist, 28(2), 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hughes, D. G. (1983). Computerized sales management. Harvard Business Review, 61(2), 102–112.Google Scholar
  67. Hughey, M. W. (1990). Internal contradictions of televangelism: ethical quandaries of that old time religion in a brave new world. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 4(1), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hunt, S. (2000). ‘winning ways’: Globalisation and the impact of the health and wealth gospel. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 15(3), 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Iannaccone, L. R. (1995a). Second thoughts: a response to Chaves, Demerath, and Ellison. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34(1), 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Iannaccone, L. R. (1995b). Voodoo economics? Reviewing the rational choice approach to religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34(1), 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. International Sociological Association (2015). Research Committee on Rational Choice TheoryRC45: Past Boards.Google Scholar
  72. Jacobs, J. A. (2013). In defense of disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and specialization in the research University. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  73. Jasso, G., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1990). The new chosen people: Immigrants in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  74. Joint Committee on Taxation, Congress of the United States (1981). General Explanation of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (H. R. 4242, 97th Congress, Public Law 97–34). https://www.jct.gov/publications.html?func=startdown&id=2397. Accessed 17 July 2013.
  75. Kalberg, S. (1994). Max Weber’s comparative-historical sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  76. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kilgore, S. B. (2016). The life and times of James S. Coleman. http://educationnext.org/life-times-james-s-coleman-school-policy-research. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
  78. Kiser, E., & Hechter, M. (1998). The debate on historical sociology: Rational choice theory and its critics. American Journal of Sociology, 104(3), 785–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ladd, A. E. (2014). Environmental disputes and opportunity-threat impacts surrounding natural gas fracking in Louisiana. Social Currents, 1(3), 293–311. doi: 10.1177/2329496514540132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Lichbach, M. I. (2003). Is rational choice theory all of social science? Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lopez, L. & La Roche, J. (2014). The CNBC Exec Who Developed ‘Mad Money’ Is Leaving to Reinvent An Iconic Wall Street TV Show. www.businessinsider.com/krakower-to-restart-wall-street-week-2014-5. Accessed 13 Nov 2016.
  83. Macy, M. W., & Flache, A. (1995). Beyond rationality in models of choice. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mallaby, A. (2016). The man who knew: The life and times of Alan Greenspan. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  85. Marsden, P. V. (2005). The sociology of James S. Coleman. Annual Review of Sociology 31:1–24.Google Scholar
  86. Marx, K. (1979). In M. Dobb (Ed.), A contribution to the critique of political economy. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr and Company.Google Scholar
  87. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Moody, J., & Light, R. (2006). A view from above: The evolving sociological landscape. The American Sociologist, 37(2), 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Mullins, N. C. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  90. Nickell, G. S., & Pinto, J. N. (1986). The computer attitude scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 2(4), 301–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Niskanen, W. A. (1988). Reaganomics: An Insider’s account of the policies and the people. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Nobelprize.org. (2014). Gary S. Becker – Biographical. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1992/becker-bio.html. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
  93. Olegario, R. (1997). IBM and the two Thomas J. Watsons. In T. K. McCraw (Ed.), Creating modern capitalism: how entrepreneurs, companies, and countries triumphed in Three industrial revolutions (pp. 349–398). Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Osbourne, M. J., & Turner, M. A. (2010). Cost Benefit Analyses versus Referenda. Journal of Political Economy, 118(1), 156–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Parsons, T. (1968). The Structure of social action, volume 1. A study in social theory with special reference to a group of recent European Writers. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  97. Pescosolido, B. A. (1992). Beyond rational choice: the social dynamics of how people seek help. American Journal of Sociology, 97(4), 1096–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Powell, R. (1990). Nuclear deterrence theory: the search for credibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Prager, R. A. (1992). The effects of deregulating cable television: evidence from the financial markets. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 4(4), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Proctor, W., & Phillips, S. (2012). The Templeton touch. West Conshohocken: Templeton.Google Scholar
  101. Rawlings, C. M., McFarland, D. A., Dahlander, L., & Wang, D. (2015). Streams of thought: Knowledge flows and intellectual cohesion in a multidisciplinary era. Social Forces, 93(4), 1687–1722. doi: 10.1093/sf/sov004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Reagan, R. (1981). Address to the nation on federal tax reduction legislation. July 27, 1981. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=44120. Accessed 16 Sept 2014.
  103. Reagan, R. (1986). Remarks to state chairpersons of the National White House Conference on small business. Presented at the old executive office building, August 15, Washington, D. C. http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1986/081586e.htm. Accessed 17 July 2013.
  104. Riesman, D. (1963). The lonely crowd: a study of the changing American character. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: a multiple paradigm science. The American Sociologist, 10(3), 156–167.Google Scholar
  106. Roark, J. L., Johnson, M. P., Cohen, P. C., Stage, S., Lawson, A., & Hartmann, S. M. (2011). Understanding the American promise, volume 2: from 1865: a brief history of the United States. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  107. Robinson, M., & Murphy, D. (2009). Greed is good: maximization and elite deviance in America. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc..Google Scholar
  108. Rodgers, D. T. (2011). Age of fracture. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Scott, J. (2000). Rational choice theory. In G. Browning, A. Halcli, & F. Webster (Eds.), Understanding Contemporary Society: theories of the Present (pp. 126–138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  110. Sebba, L., & Berenblum, T. (2014). Victimology and the sociology of new disciplines: A research agenda. International Review of Victimology, 20(1), 7–30. doi: 10.1177/0269758013511657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Shadnam, M. (2014). Heterologous and homologous perspectives on the relation between morality and organization: Illustration of implications for studying the rise of private military and security industry. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(1), 22–37. doi: 10.1177/1056492612472555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Siler, K. (2012). Nascent institutional strategy in dynamic fields: The diffusion of science and technology studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(10), 1388–1412. doi: 10.1177/0002764212454421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Slater, P. E. (1970). The pursuit of loneliness: American culture at the breaking point. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  114. Slattery, M. (2003). Key ideas in sociology. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes Ltd..Google Scholar
  115. Somers, M. R. (1998). ‘We’re no angels’: realism, rational choice, and relationality in social science. American Journal of Sociology, 104(3), 722–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Sorokin, P. A. (1966). Sociological theories of today. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  117. Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1985). The future of religion: Secularization, revival, and cult formation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  118. Starke, R., & Finke, R. (2005). The churching of America, 1776–2005: winners and losers in our religious economy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  119. Stone, O. (1987). Wall Street. DVD. Los Angeles, CA: 20th Century Fox.Google Scholar
  120. Swedberg, R. (1990). Economics and sociology: Redefining their boundaries: Conversations with economists and sociologists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  121. Swedberg, R. (1996). On analyzing the economy: The contribution of James S. Coleman. In J. Clark (Ed.), James S. Coleman (pp. 313–328). Bristol, PA: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  122. Tax Foundation. (2013). Federal Individual Income tax Rates History: Nominal dollars, income years 1913-2013. http://taxfoundation.Org/sites/default/files/docs/fed_individual_rate_history_nominal.Pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015.
  123. The Christian Broadcasting Network. (2014). About CBN. http://www.cbn.com/about/index.aspx?option=print. Accessed 12 Sept 2014.
  124. Tierney, John. (2011). The left-leaning tower. The New York Times, July 22, pp. ED34. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/24/education/edl-24notebook-t.html?_r=0. Accessed 24 May 2015.
  125. Tiryakian, E. A. (1979). The significance of schools in the development of sociology. In W. E. Sniezk, R. Fuhrman, & M. K. Miller (Eds.), Contemporary issues in theory and research: a Metasociological perspective (pp. 211–233). Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  126. Turner, S. (2014). American sociology: From pre-disciplinary to post-normal. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Turner, J., & Turner, S. (1990). The impossible science: an institutional analysis of American sociology. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  128. TV Basics. (2010). A Report on the Growth and Scope of Television. http://www.tvb.org/media/file/TV_Basics.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2014.
  129. U. S. Department of Education. (1993). Digest of educational statistics. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  130. Ulen, T. (2001). Information in the market economy—Cognitive errors and legal correctives. In S. Grundmann, W. Kerber, & S. Weatherill (Eds.), Party autonomy and the role of information in the internal market (pp. 98–130). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  131. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2004). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  132. Weber, M. (1930) [1905]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  133. Williams, S. J. (2000). Is rational choice theory ‘unreasonable’? The neglected emotions. In M. S. Archer & J. Q. Tritter (Eds.), Rational choice theory: resisting colonisation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  134. Wise, D. (1982). Wall Street’s financiers are bullish on micros. InfoWorld, July, 13–14.Google Scholar
  135. Wood, C. V. (2012). Knowledge practices, institutional strategies, and external influences in the making of an interdisciplinary field: insights from the case of women’s and gender studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(10), 1301–1325. doi: 10.1177/0002764212454427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Woolley, J. T., & Peters, G. (2014). The Achievements and Failures of the Reagan Presidency. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/reagan_100.php. Accessed 16 Sept 2014.
  137. Young, C. (2009). The emergence of sociology from political economy in the United States: 1890 to 1940. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 45(2), 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Zafirovski, M. (2000). The rational choice generalization of neoclassical economics reconsidered: any theoretical legitimation for economic imperialism? Sociological Theory, 18(3), 448–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven L. Foy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cyrus Schleifer
    • 2
  • Edward A. Tiryakian
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyThe University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyEdinburgUSA
  2. 2.The University of OklahomaNormanUSA
  3. 3.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations