Advertisement

The American Sociologist

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 40–50 | Cite as

American Sociology and the Limits of Partisan Expertise

  • Peter Baehr
Article

Abstract

Stephen Turner’s brief history of American sociology culminates in a description of its current state and prospects. The collapse of the behavioral science ideal, and the aversion to big theory, Turner argues, suggests that sociology is ever more approximating what it was in its early reformist days: a partisan endeavor, oriented to social justice, guided by and legitimized by fact-producing techniques of broadly sociological provenance. The demographic ascendancy of women in the discipline, Turner continues, is likely to accentuate this development and will parallel, rather than transform, the caste-like exclusivity of the top twenty sociology departments and the AJS/ASR nexus. This article examines Turner’s analogy of previous partisan expertise with its contemporary manifestations. It argues that the analogy is misleading, and that the “post-normal” sociology Turner sketches is of doubtful expertise precisely because of its antipathy to serious critical thought and open enquiry.

Keywords

Declinism Elite sociology Partisan expertise Feminization Reformism 

References

  1. Abbott, A. (2007). “For Humanist sociology.” Pp. 195–209 of Dan Clawson et al., Public sociology. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Arum, R. & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift. Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Goldberg, M. (2014). “Feminism’s toxic twitter wars,” The nation, http://www.thenation.com/article/178140/feminisms-toxic-twitter-wars#
  4. Gordon, D. (2014). “Legitimation, ambivalence, condemnation. Three sociological visions of the american university in the 1960s and 1970s,”. The American Sociologist, 45, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Graham, G. (2008). Universities. the recovery of an idea. Charlottesville: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  6. Horowitz, I. L. (1994). The decomposition of sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. McLaughlin, N. (2005). Canada’s impossible science: historical and institutional origins of the coming crisis of Anglo-Canadian sociology. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 30(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
  8. Turner, S. (2005). “High on insubordination.” Pp. 285–308 in Alan Sica and Stephen Turner (eds.) The disobedient generation. social theorists in the sixties. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Turner, S. (2014). American sociology: From pre-disciplinary to post-normal. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Turner, S., & Turner, J. (1990). The impossible science: An institutional analysis of american sociology. Beverley Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social PolicyLingnan UniversityTuen MunHong Kong

Personalised recommendations