Advertisement

The American Sociologist

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 155–176 | Cite as

Sociology on Latin America in the 1960s: Developmentalism, Imperialism, and Topical Tropism

  • Dimitri della Faille
Article
  • 300 Downloads

Abstract

This article reveals the emergence of the idea of development in the sociological study of Latin America in the United States as a specific product of history. We show how in the 1960s, it was the result of interaction between the economic, political, military, and scientific fields generated by the mobilization of resources based on their respective rules. We criticize the idea that sociology had clearly-defined goals during this period. Our research demonstrates, for instance, how the research conducted on Latin America during that period was rooted in “topical tropism”. Our investigation is based on the analysis of empirical data including institutional information, journal articles and historical archives.

Keywords

Latin America United States Sociology Underdevelopment 1960s 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Neil McLaughlin and Lawrence T. Nichols for their comments. Any errors or omissions, of course, are the author’s sole responsibility.

References

  1. Atkinson, R. C., & Blanpied, W. A. (2008). Research universities: core of the US science and technology system. Technology in Society, 30(1), 30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, M. T. (1995). Under northern eyes: Latin American studies and US Hegemony in the Americas, 1898–1990. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, M. T. (1997). The reconquest of Central America: Latin American studies and the transition to democracy, 1979–1990. Latin American Perspectives, 24(1), 7–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernard, J. (1965). To the editor. The American Sociologist, 1(1), 24–25.Google Scholar
  5. Bernard, J. (1967). Conflict as research and research as conflict. In I. L. Horowitz (Ed.), The rise and fall of project Camelot (pp. 128–152). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Braibanti, R. (1968). Comparative political analytics reconsidered. Journal of Politics, 30(1), 25–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1978). Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clayton, L. A. (1977). A comment on ‘Latin American studies’. Latin American Research Review, 12(2), 243–247.Google Scholar
  9. Cline, H. F. (1966). The Latin American Studies Association: a summary survey with appendix. Latin American Research Review, 2(1), 57–79.Google Scholar
  10. Coser, L. A. (1966). Some social functions of violence. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 364, 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coser, L. A. (1969). Letter to a young sociologist. Sociological Inquiry, 39(2), 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cutright, P., Hout, M., & Johnson, D. R. (1976). Structural determinants of fertility in Latin America: 1800–1970. American Sociological Review, 41(3), 511–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cuzan, A. G. (1994). The Latin American Studies Association vs. the United States: the verdict of history. Academic Questions, 7(3), 40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dillon Soares, G. A. (1976). Latin American studies in the United States: a critique and a proposal. Latin American Research Review, 11(2), 51–69.Google Scholar
  15. Drake, P. W., & Hilbink, L. (2004). Latin American studies: Theory and practice. In D. Szanton (Ed.), The politics of knowledge: Area studies and the disciplines (pp. 34–73). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1964a). Institutionalization and change. American Sociological Review, 29(2), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1964b). Modernization and conditions of sustained growth. World Politics, 16(4), 576–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development. The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Evans, P., & Stephens, J. D. (1988). Studying development since the sixties. Theory and Society, 17(5), 713–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank, A. G. (1966). The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review, 18, 17–31.Google Scholar
  21. Galtung, J. (1967). After Camelot. In I. L. Horowitz (Ed.), The rise and fall of project Camelot. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Galtung, J. (1971). A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8(1), 81–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilman, N. (2003). Mandarins of the future: Modernization theory in Cold War America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Graham, H. D., & Diamond, N. (1997). The rise of American research universities: Elites and challengers in the postwar era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, P. A., & Tarrow, S. (2001). Globalization and area studies. In P. O'Meara, H. D. Mehlinger, & R. Ma Newman (Eds.), Changing perspectives on international education (pp. 96–100). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hanke, L. (1967). Studying Latin America the views of an ‘Old Christian’. Journal of Inter-American Studies, 9(1), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horowitz, I. L. (1966). The life and death of project Camelot. American Psychologist, 21(5), 445–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horowitz, I. L. (1967). Social science and public policy: an examination of the political foundations of modern research. International Studies Quarterly, 11(1), 32–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Iutaka, S. (1965). Social stratification research in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 1(1), 7–34.Google Scholar
  30. Leys, C. (1996). The rise and fall of development theory. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
  31. Lockman, Z. (2004). Contending visions of the Middle East. The history and politics of orientalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ludden, D. (2000). Area studies in the age of globalization. Frontiers. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 6, 1–22.Google Scholar
  33. Martz, J. D. (1971). Political Science and Latin American studies: a discipline in search of a region. Latin American Research Review, 6(1), 73–99.Google Scholar
  34. Needler, M. C., & Walker, T. W. (1971). The current status of Latin American studies programs. Latin American Research Review, 6(1), 119–139.Google Scholar
  35. Petras, J. (2000). Overseas education: dispelling official myths in Latin America. Frontiers. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 6, 73–81.Google Scholar
  36. Price, D. H. (2003). Subtle means and enticing carrots. The impact of funding on American Cold War Anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 23(4), 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ratliff, W. (1989). Latin American studies: up from radicalism? Academic Questions, 3(1), 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reid Martz, M. J. (1980). Studying Latin American Political Parties: dimensions past and present. Journal of Latin American Studies, 12(1), 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rist, G. (1997). The history of development: From western origins to global faith. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  40. Sadowski-Smith, C., & Fox, C. F. (2004). Theorizing the hemisphere Inter-Americas work at the intersection of American, Canadian, and Latin American studies. Comparative American Studies, 2(1), 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Salvatore, R. D. (2003). Imágenes de un imperio. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
  42. Schuurman, F. J. (2000). Paradigms lost, paradigms regained? development studies in the twenty-first century. Third World Quarterly, 21(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simpson, C. (Ed.). (1998). Universities and empire: Money and politics in the social sciences during the cold war. New York City: New Press.Google Scholar
  44. So, A. Y. (1990). Social change and development: Modernization, dependency, and world-systems theories (vol. 178). Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  45. Sumner, A. (2006). What is development studies? Development in Practice, 16(6), 644–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Valenzuela, J. S., & Valenzuela, A. (1978). Modernization and dependency: alternative perspectives in the study of Latin American underdevelopment. Comparative Politics, 10(4), 535–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Woodford Bray, M. (2004). Latin American studies in the twenty-first century. Latin American Perspectives, 31(1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département des Sciences SocialesUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisGatineauCanada

Personalised recommendations