The American Sociologist

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 3–33

The “Bellah Affair” at Princeton

Scholarly Excellence and Academic Freedom in America in the 1970s
Article

Abstract

The so-called “Bellah affair at Princeton” began in March 1973 when a harsh but nonetheless ordinary academic fight over the appointment of Robert N. Bellah as a permanent member of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton found its way to the wider public sphere. Using published and unpublished evidence, the paper shows how two different interpretations of academic freedom were put forward by Bellah’s supporters and opponents, and how the sociological profession understood the episode as a disciplinary attack on the part of the hard sciences and historical disciplines. The emerging symbolic constellation led all the relevant actors to develop a shared interest in the rapid oblivion of the episode: the Bellah affair became a lose-lose game which all the players wanted to end as rapidly as possible.

Keywords

Robert N. Bellah Institute for Advanced Study Academic freedom Disciplinary excellence Reputation 

References

  1. Abbott, A., & Sparrow, James T. (2007). Hot war, cold war: The structures of sociological action, 1940–1955. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Sociology in America (pp. 281–313). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. C. (2003). The meanings of social life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bart, P. (1970). The role of the sociologist on public issues: an exercise in the sociology of knowledge. The American Sociologist, 5, 339–344.Google Scholar
  4. Batterson, S. (2006). Pursuit of genius: Flexner, Einstein, and the early faculty at the institute for advanced study. Wellesley: A. K. Peters.Google Scholar
  5. Bellah, M. (1999). Tammy. Berkeley: Aten.Google Scholar
  6. Bellah, R. N. (1952). Apache kinship systems. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bellah, R. N. (1957). Tokugawa religion. Glencoe: The Free.Google Scholar
  8. Bellah, R. N. (1964). Religious evolution. American Sociological Review, 29, 358–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bellah, R. N. (1965). Epilogue: Religion and progress in modern Asia. In R. N. Bellah (Ed.), Religion and progress in modern Asia (pp. 168–229). Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bellah, R. N. (1967). Civil religion in America. Dædalus, 96, 1–21.Google Scholar
  11. Bellah, R. N. (1970a). Christianity and symbolic realism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 9, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bellah, R. N. (1970b). Beyond belief. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Bellah, R. N. (1970c). Confessions of a former establishment fundamentalist. Bulletin of the Council for the Study of Religion, 1, 3–6.Google Scholar
  14. Bellah, R. N. (2007). Interview: My life and work. Tape-recorded interview by the author, Berkeley, CA: July, 2007.Google Scholar
  15. Berger, P. L. (1971). Sociology and freedom. The American Sociologist, 6, 1–5.Google Scholar
  16. Bernard, J. (1973). Support Robert Bellah. Footnotes, 1, 2.Google Scholar
  17. Bode, J. G. (1972). The silent science. The American Sociologist, 7(3), 5–6.Google Scholar
  18. Bortolini, M. (2010). Before civil religion. On Robert N. Bellah’s Forgotten Encounters with America, 1955–1965. Sociologica 4.Google Scholar
  19. Bortolini, M. (2011). The traps of intellectual success. Robert N. Bellah, the American civil religion debate, and the sociology of ideas. Unpublished paper, January 2011.Google Scholar
  20. Brogan, D., Pfeffer, L., Whitney, J. R., & Hammond, P. L. (1968). Commentaries. In D. R. Cutler (Ed.), The Religious Situation (pp. 356–388). Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  21. Bromberg, M., & Fine, G. A. (2002). Resurrecting the red: Peter Seeger and the purification of difficult reputations. Social Forces, 80, 1135–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown, J. S., & Gilmartin, B. G. (1969). Sociology today: lacunae, emphases, and surfeits. The American Sociologist, 4, 283–290.Google Scholar
  23. Buxton, W., & Turner, S. P. (1992). From education to expertise: sociology as a ‘profession’. In T. C. Halliday & M. Janowitz (Eds.), Sociology and its publics (pp. 373–407). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Calhoun, C., & VanAntwerpen, J. (2007). Orthodoxy, heterodoxy, and hierarchy: ‘Mainstream’ sociology and its challengers. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Sociology in America (pp. 367–410). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Chapman, W. (1973). The Battle of Princeton, 1973. The Washington Post, March 11, 1973: B3.Google Scholar
  26. Chase, J. M. (1970). Normative criteria for scientific publication. The American Sociologist, 5, 262–265.Google Scholar
  27. Cherry, C. (1972). Nation, church, and private religion. Journal of Church and State, 14, 223–233.Google Scholar
  28. Colfax, D. J., & Roach, J. L. (1971). Radical sociology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Dudley, L. S., & Garbin, A. P. (1972). The prestige of sociology compared to other college majors. The American Sociologist, 7, 7–8.Google Scholar
  30. Fang, J. (1975). ‘J’Accuse…’ A politics of mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica, 12, 124–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fine, G. A. (1996). Reputational entrepreneurs and the memory of incompetence: melting supporters, partisan warriors, and images of President Harding. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1159–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Finkin, M. W., & Post, R. C. (2009). For the common good. Principles of American academic freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Footlick, J. K. (1973). Thunderbolts on Olympus. Newsweek March 19, 1973: 60-63.Google Scholar
  34. Fox, M. (2007). Israel Shenker, 82, a reporter with the instincts of a scholar, dies. The New York Times June 17, 2007.Google Scholar
  35. Friedrichs, R. W. (1970). A sociology of sociology. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gamberg, H. (1969). Science and scientism: the state of sociology. The American Sociologist, 4, 111–116.Google Scholar
  37. Gamson, W. A. (1968). Sociology’s children of affluence. The American Sociologist, 3, 286–288.Google Scholar
  38. Geertz, C. (1995). After the facts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Gladden, J. W. (1971). Review of Beyond Belief by Robert N. Bellah. American Sociological Review, 36, 733–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Glock, C. Y. (1959). The sociology of religion. In R. K. Merton, L. Broom, & L. S. Cottrell (Eds.), Sociology today (pp. 154–177). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  43. Greeley, A. M. (1971). Review of Beyond Belief by Robert N. Bellah. American Journal of Sociology, 76, 754–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Halmos, P. (1970). The sociology of sociology. Keele: University of Keele Press.Google Scholar
  45. Haney, D. P. (2008). The Americanization of social science. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Hill, S. S. (1973). Review of Beyond Belief by Robert N. Bellah. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 41, 447–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hopper, J. H. (1967). Salaries of sociologists 1966. The American Sociologist, 2, 151–154.Google Scholar
  48. Horowitz, I. L. (1968). Professing sociology: Studies in the life cycle of social science. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  49. Horowitz, I. L. (1973). Trouble in paradise. The Institute for Advanced Study. Change, 5, 44–49.Google Scholar
  50. Institute for Advanced Study. (1980). A community of scholars. The Institute for Advanced Study faculty and members 1930–1980. Princeton: The Institute for Advanced Study.Google Scholar
  51. Institute for Advanced Study. (2005). Institute for Advanced Study (aka the “IAS book”). Text and production by Linda G. Arntzenius. Princeton: The Institute for Advanced Study.Google Scholar
  52. Jones, L. Y., Jr. (1974). Bad Days on Mount Olympus. The big shoot-out at the Institute for Advanced Study. The Atlantic Monthly, 233, 37–46. and 51–53.Google Scholar
  53. Kagan, J. (2009). The third culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kaysen, C. (1976). Report of the Director 1966–1976. Princeton: The Institute for Advanced Study.Google Scholar
  55. Kaysen, C. (2008). Interview: The “Bellah Affair” at Princeton. Tape-recorded interview by the author, Cambridge, MA: May 1, 2008.Google Scholar
  56. Keen, S., & Harris, T. G. (1976). The elegance of math can’t measure the rich record of human belief. Psychology Today, 9, 60 and 63.Google Scholar
  57. Klausner, S. Z., & Lidz, V. M. (1986). The nationalization of the social sciences. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  58. Lamont, M. (1987). How to become a dominant French philosopher: the case of Jacques Derrida. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 584–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1988). Recognition and renown: the survival of artistic reputation. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lewis, L. S. (1968). On subjective and objective rankings in sociology departments. The American Sociologist, 3, 129–131.Google Scholar
  62. Lewis, P. (2003). Armand Borel, 80, a Leader in 20th-Century Mathematics. The New York Times August 14, 2003.Google Scholar
  63. Lightfield, E. T. (1971). Output and recognition of sociologists. The American Sociologist, 6, 128–133.Google Scholar
  64. Lynn, R. W. (1973). Civil catechetics in Mid-Victorian America. Religious Education, 68, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mathisen, J. A. (1989). Twenty years after Bellah: whatever happened to American civil religion? Sociological Analysis, 50, 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mayhew, L. H. (1997). The new public. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mazur, A. (1968). The littlest science. The American Sociologist. August: 185–200.Google Scholar
  68. McCartney, J. L. (1970). On being scientific: changing styles of presentation of sociological research. The American Sociologist, 5, 30–35.Google Scholar
  69. McLaughlin, N. (1998). How to become a forgotten intellectual: intellectual movements and the rise and fall of Erich Fromm. Sociological Forum, 13, 215–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mees, B. (2008). The science of the Swastika. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Metzger, W. P. (1961). Academic freedom in the age of the university. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Moltmann, J. (1970). Theologische Kritik der Politische Religion. In J. B. Metz, J. Moltmann, & W. Oelmüller (Eds.), Kirche im Prozess der Aufklärung: Aspekte einer neuen “politische Theologie” (pp. 11–51). München: Chr. Kaiser Verlag.Google Scholar
  74. Moore, K. (2008). Disrupting Science. Social movements, American scientists, and the politics of the military, 1945–1975. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  75. n.w.a. (1970). The new sociology. Time magazine January 5, 1970.Google Scholar
  76. n.w.a. (1973a). Membership dispute divides Institute for Advanced Study. The Harvard Crimson March 3, 1973.Google Scholar
  77. n.w.a. (1973b.) Ivory tower tempest. Time magazine March 19, 1973: 48.Google Scholar
  78. n.w.a. (1974). Institute appoints Harvard economist. The New York Times April 29, 1974.Google Scholar
  79. Nichols, L. T. (1998). Social relations undone: disciplinary divergence and departmental politics at Harvard, 1946–1970. The American Sociologist, 29, 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nisbet, R. A. (1971). Sociological identity. The American Sociologist, 6, 182–183.Google Scholar
  81. Oromaner, M. J. (1968). The most cited sociologists. The American Sociologist, 3, 124–126.Google Scholar
  82. Parsons, T. (1965). The American sociologist: editorial statement. The American Sociologist, 1, 2–3.Google Scholar
  83. Parsons, T. (1966a). The editor’s column. The American Sociologist, 1, 124–126.Google Scholar
  84. Parsons, T. (1966b). The editor’s column. The American Sociologist, 1, 182–184.Google Scholar
  85. Parsons, T. (1967). The editor’s column. The American Sociologist, 2, 62–64.Google Scholar
  86. Parsons, T. (1973). The Bellah case. Man and God in Princeton, New Jersey. Commonweal, 98, 256–259.Google Scholar
  87. Pearson, B. A. (1999). Religious studies at Berkeley. Religion, 29, 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pincoffs, E. L. (1975). The concept of academic freedom. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  89. Platt, J. (1996). A history of sociological research methods in America: 1920–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Popovich, M. (1966). What American sociologists think about their science and its problems. The American Sociologist, 1, 133–135.Google Scholar
  91. Posner, R. A. (2001). Public intellectuals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Regis, E. (1987). Who got Einstein’s office? Eccentricity and genius at the Institute for Advanced Study. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  93. Richey, R. E., & Jones, D. G. (1974). American civil religion. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  94. Searle, J. A. (1975). Two concepts of academic freedom. In E. L. Pincoffs (Ed.), The concept of academic freedom (pp. 86–96). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  95. Segal, R. A. (1989). Religion and the social sciences. Essays on the confrontation. Atlanta: Scholars.Google Scholar
  96. Shapin, S. (2008). The scientific life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  97. Shapley, D. (1973). Institute for Advanced Study: Einstein is a hard act to follow. Science, 179(4079), 1209–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Shenker, I. (1973a). Dispute splits advanced study institute. The New York Times March 2, 1973.Google Scholar
  99. Shenker, I. (1973b). At Institute for Advanced Study, opposing sides dig in for fight. The New York Times March 4, 1973.Google Scholar
  100. Shenker, I. (1973c). Institute for advanced learning meets to resolve governance. The New York Times March 25, 1973.Google Scholar
  101. Shenker, I. (1973d). Embattled Director of Institute in Princeton vows to stay on. The New York Times April 29, 1973.Google Scholar
  102. Shweder, R. A., & Good, B. (2005). Clifford Geertz by his colleagues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  103. Sibley, E. (1971). Scientific sociology at Bay? The American Sociologist, 6(supplement), 13–17.Google Scholar
  104. Sica, A., & Turner, S. (2005). The disobedient generation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  105. Smelser, N. J., & Davis, J. A. (1969). Sociology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  106. Solomon, W. E. (1972). Correlates of prestige ranking of graduate programs in sociology. The American Sociologist, 7, 13–14.Google Scholar
  107. Solovey, M. (2004). Riding natural scientists’ coattails onto the endless frontier: the SSRC and the quest for scientific legitimacy. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 40, 393–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Stein, M. R., & Vidich, A. L. (1963). Sociology on trial. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  109. Steinmetz, G. (2007). American sociology before and after the World War II. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Sociology in America (pp. 314–366). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  110. Tiryakian, E. A. (1971). The phenomenon of sociology. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  111. Turner, S. P., & Turner, J. H. (1990). The impossible science. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  112. Maris van Blooderen, A. N. (1969). Of sociology and science. The American Sociologist, 4, 147–149.Google Scholar
  113. Wallerstein, I. (1971). There is no such thing as sociology. The American Sociologist, 6, 328.Google Scholar
  114. Wallerstein, I. (2007). The culture of sociology in disarray: The impact of the 1968 on U.S. Sociologists. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Sociology in America (pp. 427–436). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  115. Washburne, N. F. (1973). Letter to the Editor. The New York Times March 13, 1973.Google Scholar
  116. Weigert, A. J. (1972). Review of The Culture of Unbelief, edited by R. Caporale and A. Grumelli. Sociological Analysis, 33, 62–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Weil, A. (1973). Scientists & religion. Letter to the Editor. Commonweal, 98, 323. and 343.Google Scholar
  118. White, M. (1959). Religion, politics, and higher education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  119. White, M. (1974). Letter. The Atlantic Monthly, 233, 38–39.Google Scholar
  120. White, M. (1999). A philosopher’s story. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  121. Wolfe, A., McClay, W. M., & Elshtain, J. B. (2006). One of sociology’s most influential scholars. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52, 10.Google Scholar
  122. Woodward, C. V. (1973). Letter to the Editor. The New York Times March 13, 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PaduaPaduaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di SociologiaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations