Advertisement

The American Sociologist

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 232–248 | Cite as

Budgets, Board Games, and Make Believe: The Challenge of Teaching Social Class Inequality with Non-Traditional Students

  • Joshua L. CarreiroEmail author
  • Brian P. Kapitulik
Article

Abstract

According to a 2002 study by the U.S. Department of Education, the percentage of “traditional students” on college campuses is declining. Students increasingly are delaying enrollment, attending college part time, working full time, financially independent, and single parents. In this paper, we explore the extent to which sociologists are adapting their teaching to address these shifting demographics. Based on a content analysis of articles published over a 20 year period in Teaching Sociology that suggest strategies for teaching social class inequality we find that most authors assume that their students are “traditional.” Most often this means that students are assumed to come from a privileged, middle class background, lack direct and substantial experience in the labor market, and enter college shortly after graduating high school. Accordingly, most articles advocate classroom strategies of “looking down,” whereby students pretend to be in the shoes of those less fortunate. Examples include creating household budgets based on poverty wages, playing board games, or assuming the role of the poor for a day. These strategies run the risk of being ineffective, alienating, and potentially ethically suspect when used with non-traditional students, whose real life experiences may resemble these simulations. We conclude with recommendations for pedagogical approaches to teaching social class inequality that are more appropriate for, and inclusive of, students from diverse backgrounds. Our goal in this paper is to start a discussion about pedagogy, social inequality, and the non-traditional student.

Keywords

Social class inequality Pedagogy Non-traditional students Experiential learning 

References

  1. Abrahamson, M. (1994). Stratification, mobility, and a playing cards metaphor. Teaching Sociology, 22, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beller, E., & Hout, M. (2006). Intergenerational social mobility: the United States in comparative perspective. The Future of Children, 16, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brezina, T. (1996). Teaching inequality: a simple counterfactual exercise. Teaching Sociology, 24, 218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brislen, W., & Peoples, C. D. (2005). Using a hypothetical distribution of grades to introduce social stratification. Teaching Sociology, 33, 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burkart, J. (1991). Teaching sociology from everyday life. Teaching Sociology, 19, 260–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coghlan, C. L., & Huggins, D. H. (2004). That’s not fair? A simulation exercise in social stratification and structural inequality. Teaching Sociology, 32, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, L. (1995). Facilitating the critique of racism and classism: an experiential model for Euro-American middle-class students. Teaching Sociology, 23, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, N. J. (1992). Teaching about inequality: student resistance, paralysis, and rage. Teaching Sociology, 20, 232–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dews, C. L. (2005). This fine place so far from home: Voices of academics from the working class. Philadelphia: TempleUniversity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Domhoff, G. W. (2009). Who rules America? Challenges to corporate and class dominance (9th Edition). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Dundes, L., & Harlow, R. (2004). Illustrating the nature of social inequality with the simulation Star Power. Teaching Sociology, 33, 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eckel, P. D., & King, J. E. (2006). An Overview of higher education in the United States: Diversity, access, and the role of the marketplace. Washington D.C.: American Council of Education.Google Scholar
  13. Eells, L. W. (1987). So inequality is fair? Demonstrating structured inequality in the classroom. Teaching Sociology, 15, 73–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Folse, K. A. (2002). The poor pay more. Teaching Sociology, 30, 342–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grauerholz, E., & Copenhaver, S. (1994). When the personal becomes problematic: the ethics of using experiential teaching methods. Teaching Sociology, 22, 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Groves, J. M., Warren, C., & Witschger, J. (1996). Reversal of fortune: a simulation game for teaching inequality in the classroom. Teaching Sociology, 24, 364–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haddad, A. T., & Lieberman, L. (2002). From resistance to embracing the sociological imagination: unmasking privilege, social conventions, and racism. Teaching Sociology, 30, 328–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartung, B. (1991). Unstratifying stratification: teaching race, gender, and class. Teaching Sociology, 19, 66–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hattery, A. J. (2003). Sleeping in the box, thinking outside the box: student reflections on innovative pedagogical tools for teaching about and promoting a greater understanding of social class inequality among undergraduates. Teaching Sociology, 31, 412–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jessup, M. M. (2001). Sociopoly: life on the boardwalk. Teaching Sociology, 29, 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King, J. (2006). Working their way through college: Student employment and its impact on the college experience. Washington DC: American Council on Education Issue Brief.Google Scholar
  22. Lubrano, A. (2004). Limbo: Blue-collar roots, white collar dreams. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Manning, R. D., Price, D. V., & Rich, H. J. (1997). Concierge or information desk: teaching social stratification through the malling of America. Teaching Sociology, 25, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCammon, L. (1999). Introducing social stratification and inequality: an active learning technique. Teaching Sociology, 27, 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller, M. A. (1992). Life chances exercise. Teaching Sociology, 20, 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Misra, J. (1997). Teaching stratification: stimulating interest and critical thinking through research projects. Teaching Sociology, 25, 278–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nichols, L., Berry, J., & Kalogrides, D. (2004). Hop on the bus: driving stratification concepts home. Teaching Sociology, 32, 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sernau, S. (1995). Using a collaborative problem solving approach in teaching social stratification. Teaching Sociology, 23, 364–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tiemann, K. A., Davis, K., & Eide, T. L. (2006). What kind of car am I? An exercise to sensitize students to social class inequality. Teaching Sociology, 34, 398–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tokarczyk, M.M. and Fay, E.A. (1993). Working-class women in the academy: Laborers in the knowledge factory. Amherst, M.A.: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  31. Tynes, S. R. (2001). Bringing social class home: the social class genealogy and poverty lunch projects. Teaching Sociology, 29, 286–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2002). “Nontraditional undergraduates.” NCES 2002–012, by Susan Choy. Washington, DC: 2002.Google Scholar
  33. Wetcher-Hendricks, D., & Luquet, W. (2003). Teaching stratification with crayons. Teaching Sociology, 31, 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wills, J. B., Brewster, Z. W., & Fulkeson, G. M. (2005). The stratification puzzle: an active learning exercise in hard work and success. Teaching Sociology, 33, 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright, W., & Ransom, E. (2005). Stratification on the menu: using restaurant menus to examine social class. Teaching Sociology, 33, 310–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Quinsigamond Community CollegeWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations