Advertisement

The American Sociologist

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 292–305 | Cite as

Sociology’s Suicide: A Forensic Autopsy?

  • Patrick D. NolanEmail author
  • Jennifer Triplett
  • Shannon McDonough
Article

Abstract

For decades Durkheim’s theory of suicide has been tested and found wanting. Yet, rather than being consigned to the dust-bin of history, it lives on and is pointed to as an exemplar of the powers of sociological theory and research. If this rationalizing and/or dismissal of so many falsifications of the theory were an isolated phenomenon, it might be evidence of some lemming-like propensity for suicide or a disciplinary death-wish, among a few sociologists. But it appears to be a much more widespread and common occurrence. In this paper we explore some possible explanations of this ‘falsification denial’—‘The Social Misconstruction of Reality’ (Hamilton 1996), ‘When Prophecy Fails’ (Festinger et al. 1956), ‘Underdetermination’ (Duhem 1954; Quine Journal of Philosophy 67:178–183, 1970, Erkenntnis 9:313–328, 1975; Lakatos 1970), and ‘Boundary Maintenance’ (Erikson 1966), and we outline some of the more important and pernicious consequences of this falsification denial for the discipline and future of sociology.

Keywords

Falsification Durkheim Suicide Sociology of Science Fallibilism 

References

  1. Acevedo, G. A. (2005). Turning anomie on its head: fatalism as Durkheim’s concealed and multidimensional alienation theory. Sociological Theory, 23, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, B. N., & Sydie, R. A. (2001). Sociological theory. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
  3. Allan, K. (2010). Classical sociological theory: Seeing the social world (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
  4. Austin, R., Bologna, M., & Dodge, H. H. (1992). Sex-role change, anomie and female suicide: a test of alternative Durkheimian explanations. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 22(2), 197–225.Google Scholar
  5. Bankston, W. B., David Allen, H., & Cunningham, D. S. (1983). Religion and suicide: a research note on sociology’s ‘one law’. Social Forces, 62, 521–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berk, B. (2006). Macro-micro relationships in Durkheim’s analysis of egoistic suicide. Sociological Theory, 24, 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carl, J. D. (2010). Think sociology. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, R. (1985). Three sociological traditions. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, R., & Makowsky, M. (2010). The discovery of society (8th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Crichton, M. (2003). “Environmentalism as a religion,” speech to the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco, CA, September 15, 2003. http://www.michaelcrichton.net/speech-environmentalismaseligion.html.
  11. Cutright, P., & Fernquist, R. (2001). The relative gender gap in suicide: societal integration, the culture of suicide, and period effects in 20 developed countries, 1955–1994. Social Science Research, 30, 76–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danigelis, N., & Pope, W. (1979). Durkheim’s theory of suicide as applied to the family: an empirical test. Social Forces, 57(4), 1081–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delacroix, J., & Nielsen, F. (2001). The beloved myth: protestantism and the rise of industrial capitalism in nineteenth-century Europe. Social Forces, 80, 509–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delaney, T. (2004). Classical social theory: Investigation and application. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Duhem, P. (trans. P. Weiner). (1954 [1914]). The aim and structure of physical theory. English translation of the second edition of La théorie physique son objet et sa structure.Google Scholar
  16. Durkheim, E. (1951 [1897]). Suicide. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  17. Durkheim, E. (1964 [1893]). The division of labor. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  18. Durkheim, E. (1965 [1915]). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  19. Durkheim, E. (1966 [1895]). The rules of sociological method. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  20. Erikson, K. T. (1966). Wayward puritans: A study in the sociology of deviance. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  21. Fernquist, R., & Cutright, P. (1998). Societal integration and age standardized suicide rates in 21 developed countries, 1995–1989. Social Science Research, 27, 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Festinger, L., Riecken, H., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails: A social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction of the world. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  23. Giddens, A., Duneier, M., Appelbaum, R. P., & Carr, D. (2009). Introduction to sociology (7th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Girard, C. (1993). Age, gender, and suicide: a cross-national analysis. American Sociological Review, 58, 553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldstone, J. A. (2009). Building macro-theory from comparative cases: Balancing the singular and the general, Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  26. Gould, S. J. (1978). Morton’s ranking of races by cranial capacity. Science, 200, 503–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamilton, R. (1996). The social misconstruction of reality: Validity and verification in the scholarly community. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hamlin, C. L., & Brym, R. J. (2006). The return of the native: a cultural and social-psychological critique of Durkheim’s suicide based on Guarani-Kaiowá of Southwestern Brazil. Sociological Theory, 24, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, B. D. (1965). Durkheim’s one cause of suicide. American Sociological Review, 30, 875–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kimmell, M., & Aronson, A. (2009). Sociology now. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  31. Kushner, H. (1994). Durkheim and the immunity of women to suicide. In D. Lester (Ed.), Emile Durkheim Le Suicide: 100 Years later (pp. 205–233). Philadelphia: The Charles.Google Scholar
  32. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge: Proceedings of the international colloquium in the philosophy of science, London, 1965 (Vol. 4, pp. 91–195). New York: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lehmann, J. M. (1995). Durkheim’s theories of deviance and suicide: a feminist reconsideration. The American Journal of Sociology, 100, 904–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Macionis, J. J. (2009). Society: The basics (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Maris, R. W., Berman, A. L., & Silverman, M. M. (2000). Comprehensive textbook of suicidology. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  36. Mayhew, B. H. (1980). Structuralism versus individualism: part I, shadowboxing in the dark. Social Forces, 59, 335–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayhew, B. H. (1981). Structuralism versus individualism: part II, ideological and other obfuscations. Social Forces, 59, 627–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newman, D. M. (2010). Sociology: Exploring the architecture of everyday life. Los Angeles: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
  39. Nolan, P. D. (2003). Questioning textbook truth: suicide rates and the Hawthorne effect. The American Sociologist, 34, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nolan, P. D., & Lenski, G. (2009). Human societies: An introduction to macrosociology. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  41. Nolan, P., Irwin, K., Triplet, J., McDonough, S., & Guerrero-Arnold, E. (2008). Sex and suicide: a cross-national test of a convergence hypothesis. Sociation Today, 6(1). http://www.ncsociology.org/sociationtoday/v61/suicide.htm.
  42. Pampel, F. (1998). National context, social change, and sex differences in suicide rates. American Sociological Review, 63, 744–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parkes, H. B. (1939). Marxism: An autopsy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  44. Peregrine, P. N. (1996). The birth of the Gods revisited: a partial replication of guy Swanson’s (1960) cross-cultural study of religion. Cross-Cultural Research, 30, 84–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pescosolido, B. A. (1990). The social context of religious integration and suicide: pursuing the network explanation. The Sociological Quarterly, 31, 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pescosolido, B. A., & Georgianna, S. (1989). Durkheim, suicide, and religion: toward a network theory of suicide. American Sociological Review, 42, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pope, W. (1982 [1976]). Durkheim’s suicide: A classic reanalyzed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pope, W., & Danigelis, N. (1981). Sociology’s ‘one law’. Social Forces, 60, 495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Popper, K. R. (1976). The logic of the social sciences. In T. Adorno, H. Albert, R. Dahrendorf, J. Habermas, H. Pilot, & K. Popper (Eds.), The positivist dispute in German sociology (pp. 87–104). London: Heineman.Google Scholar
  50. Popper, K. R. (2002). Conjectures and refutation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Quine, W. V. O. (1970). On the reasons for indeterminacy of translation. Journal of Philosophy, 67, 178–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Quine, W. V. O. (1975). Empirically equivalent systems of the world. Erkenntnis, 9, 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ritzer, G. (2010). Contemporary social theory and its classical roots: The basics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  54. Schwartzschild, L. (1947). Karl Marx: The red Prussian. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.Google Scholar
  55. Stack, S. (1983). The effect of religious commitment on suicide: a cross-national analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 362–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stack, S. (1987). The effect of female participation in the labor force on suicide: a time series analysis, 1948–1980. Sociological Forum, 2(2), 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Steen, D., & Mayer, P. (2004). Modernization and the male-female suicide ratio in India 1967–1997: divergence or convergence? Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 34(2), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Steffensmeier, R. H. (1984). Suicide and the contemporary woman: are male and female suicide rates converging? Sex Roles, 10(7/8), 613–631.Google Scholar
  59. Swanson, G. E. (1960). The birth of the Gods: The origin of primitive beliefs. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  60. Timmermans, S. (2005). Suicide determination and the professional authority of medical examiners. American Sociological Review, 70, 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Trovato, F., & Vos, R. (1992). Married female labor force participation and suicide in Canada, 1971 and 1981. Sociological Forum, 7, 661–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Turner, J. H. (2003). The structure of social theory (7th ed.). New York: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  63. Turner, J. H., Beeghley, L., & Powers, C. H. (2007). The emergence of sociological theory (6th ed.). New York: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  64. van den Berg, A. (1988). The immanent Utopia: From Marxism on the state to the state of Marxism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wesson, R. G. (1976). Why Marxism? The continuing success of a failed theory. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  66. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  67. Wilson, J. (1983). Social theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  68. Young, F. W. (1965). Initiation ceremonies: A cross-cultural study of status dramatization. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merril.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick D. Nolan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jennifer Triplett
    • 1
  • Shannon McDonough
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations