The American Sociologist

, 40:332 | Cite as

A Nobel Trinity: Jane Addams, Emily Greene Balch and Alva Myrdal

  • Barbara A. MisztalEmail author


The aim of the paper is to present unusual achievements of three women sociologists who won the Nobel Peace Prize. Its goal is also to contribute to a long standing discussion of the role sociologists as public intellectuals. By focusing on Addams, Balch and Myrdal’s scholarly and public life, the paper demonstrates what social scientists can offer in the role of public intellectuals and debates what are the source of intellectuals’ public standing. The paper concludes by arguing that these three intellectuals’ successful achievement of their goals was possible because of their professional credential and because of their courage to take on risky actions for purposes to institutionalise social or cultural change.


Addams Myrdal Balch Nobel Public intellectuals Sociology 


  1. Abrams, I. (1988). The Nobel Peace Prize and the Laureates: an Illustrated Biographical History, 1901–1987. Boston: G.K. Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Addams, J. (1902). Democracy and social ethics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Addams, J. (1917). The long road of woman’s memory. New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar
  4. Addams, J. (1925). [1910] Twenty Years at Hull House. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Addams, J. (1960). A Centennial Reader. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Addams, J. (2002). [1893] The objective value of a social settlements. In J. Elshtain Bethke (Ed.), The Jane Addams Reader (pp. 29–46). New York: Basic Book.Google Scholar
  7. Addams, J., Balch, E. G., & Hamilton, A. (2003). Women at The Hague, with an introduction by H.H. Alonso. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  8. Alonso, H. H. (1994). Jane Addams and Emily Greene Balch: two women of WILPF. In K. Holl & A. C. Kjellong (Eds.), The nobel peace prize and the laureates (pp. 201–226). Frankfurt: Peterlang.Google Scholar
  9. Balch, E. G. (1972). In M. M. Randall (Ed.), Beyond nationalism. The social thought of Emily Greene Balch. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
  10. Balch, E. G. (2006). [1946] Nobel Lecture
  11. Bethke Elshtain, J. (2002a). The Jane Addams Reader. New York: Basic Book.Google Scholar
  12. Bethke Elshtain, J. (2002b). Jane Addams and the American dream of democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Bethke Elshtain, J. (2006). Why public intellectuals. In A. Etzoni & A. Bowdich (Eds.), Public Intellectuals (pp. 81–90). New York: Rowman &L ittlefield.Google Scholar
  14. Brown Bissell, V. (2004). The education of Jane Addams. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  15. Burawoy, M. (2005). 2004 American Sociological Association Presidential Address: For public sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 56(2), 259–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bussey, G., & Tims, M. (1965). Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom. 1915–1965. London: Allen and Uwin.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, A. F. (1973). American heroine. The life and legend of Jane Addams. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Deegan, M. J. (1983). Sociology at Wellesley College 1900–1914. Journal of the History of Sociology, 6, 91–115.Google Scholar
  19. Deegan, M. J. (1986). Jane Addams Jane and men of the Chicago school. New Brunswick, NJ: Transcation Books.Google Scholar
  20. Deegan, M. J. (1999). Introduction. In M. J. Deegan (Ed.), Women in sociology. A bio-bibliographical source book (pp. 1–28). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  21. Deegan, M. J. (2003). Textbooks, the history and the sociological stock of knowledge. Sociological Theory, 21(3), 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deegan, M. J. (2007). Jane Addams. In J. Scott (Ed.), Fifty key sociologists (pp. 3–8). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Ekerwald, H. (2000). Alva Myrdal: making the private public. Acta Sociologica, 43(3), 342–352.Google Scholar
  24. Ekerwald, H. (2001). The modernist manifesto of Alva and Gunnar Myrdal. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 14(3), 539–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ekerwald, H. (2005). The private life of a Public Intellectual, Alva Myrdal in the Service of United Nations 1949–1955. A paper presented the 37 World Congress of ISA, Stockholm 5–9 July.Google Scholar
  26. Eyerman, R. (1994). Between culture and politics. Intellectuals in modern society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  27. Feagin, J. R. (2001). Social justice and sociology. American Sociological Review, 66, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feagin, J. R. (2005). Review of A. J. Blasi (ed) Diverse Histories of American Sociology, Timelines, E-Newsletter of History of Sociology Section of ASS, no 4, pp. 1 and 6.Google Scholar
  29. Halbwachs, M. ([1926] (1950)). The collective memory. Trans. F. J. Ditter, and V. Y. Ditter. Introduction by M. Douglas. London: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
  30. Hamilton, R. F. (2003). American sociology rewrites history. Sociological Theory, 21(3), 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henslin, J. (1999). Introduction to sociology. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  32. Hijalmeskog, H. (2002). Education for home and family life. A paper presented at a conference ‘Alva Myrdal’s Questions to Our Time’, Uppsala, Sweden. March 6–8.Google Scholar
  33. Holmwood, J. (2000). Three pillars of the welfare state theory: T.H. Marshall, Karl Polanyi and Alva Myrdal. European Journal of Social Theory, 3(1), 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jahn, G. (2006). [1946] The Nobel Peace Prize Presentation Speech
  35. Keene, A. T. (1998). Peacemakers. Winners of the nobel peace prize. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kendall, D. (2001). Sociology in our times. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  37. Kenny, M. (2004). Reckless minds or democracy’s helpers? Intellectuals and politics in the twentieth Century. Contemporary Political Theory, 3, 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knight, L. W. (1997). Jane Addams and the settlement house movement. In O. P. A. Cimbala & R. M. Miller (Eds.), Against the tide. Women reformers in American society (p. 112). Westport, Conn: Praeger.Google Scholar
  39. Knight, L. (2005). Citizen. Jane Addams and the struggle for democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  40. Koht, P. ([1931] 2005). The Nobel Prize Presentation Speech. Scholar
  41. Lasch, C. (1965). In C. Lasch (Ed.), The social thought of Jane Addams (pp. xii–ix). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  42. Lengermann, P. (1998). The women founders: sociology and social theory 1830–19939. New York: McGraw-Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Lengermann, P., & Niebrugger-Brantleym, J. (1996). Early Women Sociologists. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Classical sociology (pp. 294–328). New York: McGraw-Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Levine, D. (1971). Jane Addams and the liberal tradition. Madison: State Historical Society of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  45. Levy, L. W., & Young, A. (1965). Foreword. In C. Lasch (Ed.), The social thought of Jane Addams (pp. xii–ix). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  46. Lyman, S. M., & Eliason, S. (2001). Alva and Gunnar Myrdal e: a symposium on their lives and work. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 14(3), 439–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lyon, E. S. (2001). Education for modernity: the impact of American social science on Alva and Gunnar Myrdal. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 14(3), 513–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lyon, E. S. (2002). Alva Myrdal and Vola Klein’s women’s two roles. A paper presented at a conference ‘Alva Myrdal’s Questions to Our Time’, Uppsala, Sweden. March 6–8.Google Scholar
  49. Lyon, E. S. (2007). Viola Klein: forgotten émigré intellectual, public sociologist and advocate of women. Sociology, 41(5), 829–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Macionis, J. (1999). Sociology. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  51. Madoo Lengermann, P., & Niebrugge-Brantley, G. (1998). The women founders. Sociology and social theory 1830–1930. New York: McGrawHill.Google Scholar
  52. McDonald, L. (1994). Women founders of sociology. Ottawa: Carleton University.Google Scholar
  53. Mead, G. H. (1929). The nature of the past. In J. Coss (Ed.), Essays in honor of John Dewey (pp. 235–242). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  54. Mead, G. H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. In A. E. Murphy (Ed.). LaSalle, IL: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Misztal, B. A. (2007). Intellectuals and the public good. Creativity and courage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Myrdal, A. (1945). Nation and family. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  57. Myrdal, A., & Klein, V. (1956). Women’s two roles. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  58. Myrdal, A. (1976). The game of disarmament: how the United States and Russia run the arms race. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  59. Nielsen, F. (2004). The vacant ‘we’: remarks of public sociology. Social Forces, 82(4), 1619–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Palmieri, P. A. (1996). “The simplest of New England”: becoming Emily Greene Balch .1867–1961. Women of the commonwealth; work, family and social change in nineteenth century Massachusetts (pp. 283–206). Amherst, Mass: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  61. Paterson, E. M. (1959). Champions of peace. Boston: Little Brown Company.Google Scholar
  62. Randall, M. M. (1964). Improper Bostonian. Emily Greene Balch. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
  63. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Ross, D. (1998). Gender and American social science: the formative years. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Schneider, D. (2003). Literature on Women Immigrants to the United States Dept. of Sociology, University of Illinois accessed 12 December 2006.
  66. Schram, S. F. (2002). Praxis and the poor: piven and cloward and the future of social sciences in social welfare. New York: New York State University.Google Scholar
  67. Scott, J. (Ed.) (2007). Fifty key sociologists. London: Routlegde.Google Scholar
  68. Seigfried, C. H. (1996). Pragmatism and feminism. Reweaving the social fabric. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  69. Seigfried, C. H. (1999). Socializing democracy. Jane Addams and John Dewey. Philosophy of the Social Science, 29(2), 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sennett, R. (2003). Respect. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  71. Spanish, D. (2002). Making the celestial city. Times Literary Supplement, 24, 5–6.Google Scholar
  72. Stenersen, Q., et al. (eds). (2001). The Nobel Peace Prize. Oslo: Cappelen.Google Scholar
  73. Theorin, B. -M. (2001). Alva Myrdal and the peace movement., a paper presented at a conference ‘Alva Myrdal’s Questions to Our Time, Uppsala, Sweden. March 6–8.Google Scholar
  74. Turner, B. S. (2006). British sociology and public intellectuals: consumer society and imperial decline. British Journal of Sociology, 57(2), 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Turner, S. (2007). Public sociology and democratic theory. Sociology, 41(5), 785–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations