The American Sociologist

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 5–14

Blumer’s dilemma: The critic as a tragic figure

  • Joel Best
Article

Abstract

Herbert Blumer criticized sociological research for its failure to confront obdurate, empirical reality. However, Blumer conducted little research of his own. An examination of his works on crowds, fashion, and social problems reveals some of the same problems he found in others’ works. Blumer illustrates how critics risk becoming tragic figures, wedded to theoretical principles that cannot be put into practice.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, A. 1999. Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  2. Athens, L.H. 1984. “Blumer’s Method of Naturalistic Inquiry: A Critical Examination,” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 5: 241–257.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, H.S. 1988. “Herbert Blumer’s Conceptual Impact,” Symbolic Interaction 11: 13–21.Google Scholar
  4. Best, J. 1993. “But Seriously Folks: The Limitations of the Strict Constructionist Interpretation of Social Problems.” Pp. 129–147 in Reconsidering Social Constructionism: Debates in Social Problems Theory, edited by J.A. Holstein and G. Miller. (Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter).Google Scholar
  5. Blumer, H. 1933. Movies and Conduct. (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  6. —. 1951 [1939]. “Collective Behavior.” Pp. 167–222 in Principles of Sociology, 2nd ed. rev., edited by A.M. Lee. (New York: Barnes and Noble).Google Scholar
  7. —. 1948. “Public Opinion and Public Opinion Polling,” American Sociological Review 13: 542–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. —. 1949. Critiques of Research in the Social Sciences No. I: An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. (New York: Social Science Research Council).Google Scholar
  9. —. 1954. “What Is Wrong with Social Theory,” American Sociological Review 19: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. —. 1969a. “Fashion: From Class Differentiation to Collective Selection,” Sociological Quarterly 10: 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. —. 1969b. Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  12. —. 1971. “Social Problems as Collective Behavior,” Social Problems 18: 298–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. —. 1990. Industrialization as an Agent of Social Change, edited by David R. Maines and Thomas J. Morrione. (Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter).Google Scholar
  14. —, and Philip M. Hauser. 1933. Movies, Delinquency, and Crime. (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  15. —, Alan Sutter, Samir Ahmed, and Roger Smith. 1967. “The World of Youthful Drug Use.” ADD Center Final Report, School of Criminology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  16. Carey, J.T. 1968. The College Drug Scene. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  17. Davis, F. 1991. “Herbert Blumer and the Study of Fashion: A Reminiscence and a Critique,” Symbolic Interaction 14: 1–21.Google Scholar
  18. Deutscher, I. 2005. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  19. Fine, G.A. 1995. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–16 in A Second Chicago School?: The Development of a Postwar American Sociology, edited by G.A. Fine. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Glaser, B.G., and A.L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. (Chicago, IL: Aldine).Google Scholar
  21. Hirsch, P.M. 1972. “Processing Fads and Fashions,” American Journal of Sociology 77: 639–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lofland, J. 2005. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  23. Maines, D.R. 1989. “Herbert Blumer on the Possibility of Science in the Practice of Sociology,” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18: 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. —. 2003. “Interactionism’s Place,” Symbolic Interaction 26: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. -. 2005. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  26. McPhail, C. 1991. The Myth of the Madding Crowd. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  27. —, and Cynthia Rexroat. 1980. “Ex Cathedra Blumer or Ex Libris Mead?”, American Sociological Review 45: 420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shibutani, T. 1970. Human Nature and Collective Behavior. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  29. Strauss, A. 1996. “A Partial Line of Descent: Blumer and I,” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 20: 3–22.Google Scholar
  30. Stryker, S. 1988. “Substance and Style: An Appraisal of the Sociological Legacy of Herbert Blumer,” Sym-bolic Interaction 11: 33–42.Google Scholar
  31. Sutter, A.G. 1969. “Worlds of Drug Use on the Street Scene.” Pp. 802–829 in Delinquency, Crime, and Social Process, edited by D.R. Cressey and D.A. Ward. (New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
  32. Woolgar, S. and D. Pawluch. 1985. “Ontological Gerrymandering,” Social Problems 32: 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joel Best
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DelawareUSA

Personalised recommendations