The American Sociologist

, Volume 36, Issue 3–4, pp 121–132 | Cite as

Global public social science

  • Christopher Chase-Dunn

Abstract

Burawoy’s classification of the complementary aspects of the discipline of sociology is used to describe an emergent global public social science that will assist transnational social movements in the building of a democratic and collectively rational global commonwealth.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appelbaum, R., and Bonacich, E. 2000. Behind the Label. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arrighi, G. 1994. The Long Twentieth Century. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. —, Hopkins, T.K, and Wallerstein, I. 1989. Antisystemic Movements. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Boswell, T., and Chase-Dunn, C. 2000. The Spiral of Capitalism and Socialism: Toward Global Democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  5. Brenner, R. 2002. The Boom and the Bubble: The U.S. in the World Economy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Burawoy, M. 1979. Manufacturing Consent. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. —. 1985. The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes under Capitalism and Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. —. 2000. Global Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. —. 2005. “2004 ASA Presidential Address: For Public Sociology” American Sociological Review 70,1: 4–28 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chase-Dunn, C. 2005. “Social Evolution and the Future of World Society,” Pp. 13–38 in M. Herkenrath, et al (eds.) The Future of World Society. Zurich: Intelligent.Google Scholar
  11. —, and Hall, T.D. 1997. Rise and Demise: Comparing World-Systems. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  12. —, Kawano, Y., and Brewer, B.D. 2000 “Trade Globalization since 1795: Waves of Integration in the World-System.” American Sociological Review 65(1): 77–95 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. —, and Babones, S. 2006. Global Social Change: Comparative and Historical Perspectives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, W.F., and Ponniah, T. 2003. Another World Is Possible: Popular Alternatives to Globalization at the World Social Forum. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gill, S. 2000. “Toward a Post-Modern Prince?: The Battle of Seattle as a Moment in the New Politics of Globalization” Millennium 29 (1): 131–140.Google Scholar
  16. Gowan, P. 1999. The Global Gamble: Washington's Faustian Bid for World Dominance. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, T.D. 2000. A World-Systems Reader. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  18. Hardt, M., and Negri, A. 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Harvey, D. 2003. The New Imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hobsbawm, E. 1994. The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914-1991. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  21. Jeffries, V. 2005. “Pitirim A. Sorokin's Integralism and Public Sociology” American Sociologist. American Sociologist, Vol 36.Google Scholar
  22. Keck, M.E., and Sikkink. K. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lipset, S.M. 1963. The First New Nation: The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Mann, M. 2003. Incoherent Empire. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  25. McMichael, P. 2004. Development and Social Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  26. Moghadam, V. 2005. Globalizing Women. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. O'Rourke, K.H., and Williamson, J.G. 2000. Globalization and History. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Podobnik, B. 2004. “Resistance to Globalization: Cycles and Evolution in the Globalization Protest Movement” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, August 15.Google Scholar
  29. —, and Reifer, T.E. 2005. Transforming Globalization: Challenges and Opportunities in the Post 9/11 Era. New York: Brill.Google Scholar
  30. Robinson, W.I. 2004 A Theory of Global Capitalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sachs, J. 2005. The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities of Our Time. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. Schönleitner, G. 2003. “World Social Forum: Making Another World Possible?” Pp. 127–149 in J. Clark (ed.): Globalizing Civic Engagement: Civil Society and Transnational Action. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  33. Silver, B. 2003. Forces of Labor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. —, and Arrighi, G. 2005. “Polanyi's ‘Double Movement’: The Belle Époques of British and U.S. Hegemony Compared” In Friedman, J. and Chase-Dunn, C. Hegemonic Declines: Present and Past. Boulder, CO: Paridigm Press.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, J. 2004. “The World Social Forum and the Challenges of Global Democracy.” G/oéa/ Networks 4(4): 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. —, and Johnston, H. 2002. Globalization and Resistance: Transnational Dimensions of Social Movements. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  37. Starr, A. 2000. Naming the Enemy: Anti-corporate Movements Confront Globalization. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
  38. —. 2005. Global Revolt: A Guide to the Global Revolt against Globalization. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wagar, W.W. 1999. A Short History of the Future. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wallerstein, I. 2003. The Decline of American Power: The U.S. in a Chaotic World. New York: New Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Chase-Dunn
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaRiverside
  2. 2.Institute for Research on World-SystemsUSA

Personalised recommendations