Advertisement

Utility and Practicality of Multi-level Sectioning and Upfront Unstained Slide Cutting in Head and Neck Biopsies: A Critical Analysis

  • Mario W. Saab-Chalhoub
  • James S. LewisJr.Email author
Original Paper

Abstract

Upfront interval sectioning (cutting unstained slides between H&E levels) is used at our institution for biopsies at all sites except the gastrointestinal tract. Very limited data exists in the literature for the need for interval sectioning, and we are aware of no data at all for the head and neck. Biopsies from the larynx, oral cavity, pharynx, and sinonasal tract at our institution have had 5 levels cut. Levels 1, 3, and 5 or levels 2 and 5 had been stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), depending on the subsite, and the remaining slides saved for possible later use. We retrospectively evaluated the use of unstained slides at these sites for clinical utility and efficiency by analyzing 3 years of cases from 1/1/2014 to 12/30/2016. A cutoff of 10% utilization was considered justification for continued upfront unstained slide cutting. We collected 706 larynx, 572 oral cavity, 184 pharynx, and 85 sinonasal tract biopsies over 3 years. The overall rate of unstained slide usage was 18.2%. Usage rates were significantly different by site: 7.8% (55/706) for larynx, 21.9% (125/572) for oral cavity, 30.6% (26/85) for sinonasal tract and 40.8% (75/184) for pharynx (p < 0.0001). The most common stain ordered in the pharynx was p16 immunohistochemistry (59.7%), but it was Grocott methenamine silver staining in the larynx (74.5%), oral cavity (70.4%), and sinonasal tract (35.1%). Usage of unstained slides was lowest for the larynx, and review of the biopsies with unstained slides utilized showed that the lesion was present on the 3rd H&E level in all cases. Removing this practice would have translated to saving 1,378 unstained slides. Upfront interval sectioning makes practical sense for biopsies from most sites in the head and neck, especially the pharynx, but our data suggests it can reasonably be forgone at least for biopsies of the larynx.

Keywords

Head and neck biopsies Histology Lab management Quality improvement Multi-level sectioning Unstained slides 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Craig W. Self, BS and Mary F. Abbuhl, MS for general administrative support and for their assistance with Cerner Copath functions and searches.

References

  1. 1.
    Hameed O, Humphrey PA. Immunohistochemical evaluation of prostate needle biopsies using saved interval sections vs new recut sections from the block a prospective comparison. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;131(5):683–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salaria S, Self C, Abbuhl M, Hameed O, Gellert L. Elimination of cutting and saving unstained sections of GI biopsy specimens yields significant benefits with no untoward effects on quality. Poster presented at: USCAP 2016 Annual Meeting; March 12–18, 2018; Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martínez-Menchón T, Sánchez-Pedreño P, Martínez-Escribano J, Corbalán-Vélez R, Martínez-Barba E. Cost analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2015;106(3):201–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engvad B, Poulsen MH, Staun PW, Walter S, Marcussen N. Histological step sectioning of pelvic lymph nodes increases the number of identified lymph node metastases. Virchows Arch. 2014;464(1):45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schilling D, Hennenlotter J, Gakis G, et al. Prospective assessment of histological serial sectioning of pelvic lymph nodes in prostate cancer: a cost-benefit analysis. BJU Int. 2012;110(6B):166–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomsen JB, Christensen RK, Sørensen JA, Krogdahl A. Sentinel lymph nodes in cancer of the oral cavity: is central step-sectioning enough? J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;36(7):425–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim CH, Soslow RA, Park KJ, et al. Pathologic ultrastaging improves micrometastasis detection in sentinel lymph nodes during endometrial cancer staging. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23(5):964–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Younis RT, Hesse SV, Anand VK. Evaluation of the utility and cost-effectiveness of obtaining histopathologic diagnosis on all routine tonsillectomy specimens. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(12):2166–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chakrabarty A, Franks AJ. Temporal artery biopsy: is there any value in examining biopsies at multiple levels? J Clin Pathol. 2000;53(2):131–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grimes MM, Karageorge LS, Hogge JP. Does exhaustive search for microcalcifications improve diagnostic yield in stereotactic core needle breast biopsies? Mod Pathol. 2001;14(4):350–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lewis JS, Beadle B, Bishop JA, et al. Human papillomavirus testing in head and neck carcinomas: guideline from the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;142(5):559–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pathology, Microbiology and ImmunologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of OtolaryngologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations