Advertisement

Head and Neck Pathology

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 451–464 | Cite as

Interobserver Variation Among Pathologists in Evaluating Perineural Invasion for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Angela C. ChiEmail author
  • Nora Katabi
  • Huey-Shys Chen
  • Yi-Shing Lisa Cheng
Original Paper

Abstract

The aims of this study are as follows: (1) to assess variations among pathologists in evaluating perineural invasion (PNI) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), (2) to survey PNI criteria used by pathologists and how they came to adopt those criteria. An electronic survey was sent to 363 oral and/or surgical pathologists. Eligibility criteria included pathology board certification. The survey participants were asked to rate whether PNI was present, absent, or uncertain for 15 provided photomicrographs, which depicted various types of tumor-nerve relationships without excessive desmoplasia or lymphocytic host response. The survey obtained information regarding demographics, whether PNI criteria were taught during residency, criteria used by participants to evaluate PNI, how the participants developed their criteria, and agreement with six proposed PNI definitions. 88 pathologists completed the survey. The participants included 47 males and 41 females, with average age = 49 years and average practice experience = 17 years. Practice settings included dental school (40 %), medical school (36 %), private pathology lab (13 %), and other (11 %). Agreement between participants in rating PNI status for the provided images was fair (κ = .38, 95 % CI .37–.39). 56 % of respondents indicated that they were taught PNI criteria during residency training. The basis for criteria currently used by participants included residency training (n = 42), published literature (n = 29), and own experience/views (n = 32). Agreement regarding six proposed PNI definitions was slight (κ = .10, 95 % CI .08–.11). In conclusion, interobserver agreement in assessing PNI status was fair. Our results suggest that more widely accepted, objective, and reproducible criteria are needed for evaluating PNI in OSCC.

Keywords

Perineural invasion Oral cavity Squamous cell carcinoma 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research (SCTR) Institute with an academic home at the Medical University of South Carolina, through NIH Grant Numbers UL1 RR029882 and UL1 TR000062; and the Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Texas A&M University—Baylor College of Dentistry. The authors wish to thank all colleagues who participated in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    National Comprehensive Care Network: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines): head and neck cancers, version 1. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#head-and-neck (2015). Accessed 27 Aug 2015.
  2. 2.
    Johnston M, Yu E, Kim J. Perineural invasion and spread in head and neck cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2012;12:359–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tai SK, Li WY, Chu PY, Chang SY, Tsai TL, Wang YF, et al. Risks and clinical implications of perineural invasion in T1-2 oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2012;34:994–1001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hinerman RW, Mendenhall WM, Morris CG, Amdur RJ, Werning JW, Villaret DB. Postoperative irradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: 35-year experience. Head Neck. 2004;26:984–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brandwein-Gensler M, Teixeira MS, Lewis CM, Lee B, Rolnitzky L, Hille JJ, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:167–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fagan JJ, Collins B, Barnes L, D’Amico F, Myers EN, Johnson JT. Perineural invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:637–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Batsakis JG. Nerves and neurotropic carcinomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1985;94:426–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akert K, Sandri C, Weibel ER, Peper K, Moor H. The fine structure of the perineural endothelium. Cell Tissue Res. 1976;165:281–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, Berger DH, Albo D. Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature. Cancer. 2009;115:3379–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dunn M, Morgan MB, Beer TW. Perineural invasion: identification, significance, and a standardized definition. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:214–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:276–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller ME, Palla B, Chen Q, Elashoff DA, Abemayor E, St John MA, et al. A novel classification system for perineural invasion in noncutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: histologic subcategories and patient outcomes. Am J Otolaryngol. 2012;33:212–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seefeld PH, Bargen JA. The spread of carcinoma of the rectum: invasion of lymphatics, veins and nerves. Ann Surg. 1943;118:76–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ojiri H. Perineural spread in head and neck malignancies. Radiat Med. 2006;24:1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mendenhall WM, Ferlito A, Takes RP, Bradford CR, Corry J, Fagan JJ, et al. Cutaneous head and neck basal and squamous cell carcinomas with perineural invasion. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:918–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gil Z, Carlson DL, Gupta A, Lee N, Hoppe B, Shah JP, et al. Patterns and incidence of neural invasion in patients with cancers of the paranasal sinuses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135:173–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Binmadi NO, Basile JR. Perineural invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a discussion of significance and review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:1005–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kurtz KA, Hoffman HT, Zimmerman MB, Robinson RA. Perineural and vascular invasion in oral cavity squamous carcinoma: increased incidence on re-review of slides and by using immunohistochemical enhancement. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:354–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Berlingeri-Ramos AC, Detweiler CJ, Wagner RF Jr, Kelly BC. Dual S-100-AE1/3 immunohistochemistry to detect perineural invasion in nonmelanoma skin cancers. J Skin Cancer. 2015;2015:620235.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Frydenlund N, Leone DA, Mitchell B, Abbas O, Dhingra J, Mahalingam M. Perineural invasion in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: role of immunohistochemistry, anatomical site, and the high-affinity nerve growth factor receptor TrkA. Hum Pathol. 2015;46:1209–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Piña AR, Martinez MM, de Almeida OP. Glut-1, best immunohistochemical marker for perineurial cells. Head Neck Pathol. 2015;9:104–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tatemoto Y, Saka M, Tanimura T, Mori M. Immunohistochemical observations on binding of monoclonal antibody to epithelial membrane antigen in epithelial tumors of the oral cavity and skin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987;64:721–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ayala FR, Rocha RM, Carvalho KC, Carvalho AL, da Cunha IW, Lourenco SV, et al. GLUT1 and GLUT3 as potential prognostic markers for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Molecules. 2010;15:2374–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    De Vicente JC, Fernandez-Valle A, Vivanco-Allende B, Santamarta TR, Lequerica-Fernandez P, Hernandez-Vallejo G, et al. The prognostic role of claudins -1 and -4 in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:2949–59.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ueno H, Shirouzu K, Eishi Y, Yamada K, Kusumi T, Kushima R, et al. Characterization of perineural invasion as a component of colorectal cancer staging. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:1542–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Scanlon CS, Banerjee R, Inglehart RC, Liu M, Russo N, Hariharan A, et al. Galanin modulates the neural niche to favour perineural invasion in head and neck cancer. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6885.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kolokythas A, Cox DP, Dekker N, Schmidt BL. Nerve growth factor and tyrosine kinase A receptor in oral squamous cell carcinoma: is there an association with perineural invasion? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1290–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela C. Chi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nora Katabi
    • 2
  • Huey-Shys Chen
    • 3
  • Yi-Shing Lisa Cheng
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Oral Pathology, College of Dental MedicineMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PathologyMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.College of NursingUniversity of ToledoToledoUSA
  4. 4.Department of Diagnostic SciencesTexas A&M University - Baylor College of DentistryDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations