Head and Neck Pathology

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 327–331 | Cite as

Dental Stigmata of Congenital Syphilis: A Historic Review With Present Day Relevance

  • Eranga H. Nissanka-Jayasuriya
  • Edward W. Odell
  • Carina Phillips
Historical Perspectives in Pathology

Abstract

Syphilis was the first sexually transmitted disease to be diagnosed in childhood. Most developed countries controlled syphilis effectively after the 1950s and congenital syphilis became rare. Since the late 1990s there has been a resurgence of syphilis in developed and developing countries and the WHO estimates that at least half a million infants die of congenital syphilis every year. The earliest reference to the dental manifestations of congenital syphilis was by Sir Jonathan Hutchinson, Assistant Surgeon at The London Hospital in 1861. Three main dental defects are described in congenital syphilis; Hutchinson’s incisors, Moon’s molars or bud molars, and Fournier’s molars or mulberry molars. Although many physicians, dentists, and pathologists in developed countries will be aware of the dental features of syphilis, most will never have seen a case or made the diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to review some of the history of congenital syphilis, remind healthcare professionals of the features, and bring to their attention that the changes are still prevalent and that milder cases can be mistaken for other causes of hypoplasia.

Keywords

Congenital syphilis Hutchinson’s incisors Mulberry molars Moon’s molars 

References

  1. 1.
    Recent epidemiology of infectious syphilis and congenital syphilis in England. In: Health protection report. 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/336760/hpr4413_sphls.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2016.
  2. 2.
    Number and rates of selected STI diagnoses in the UK, 2009–2013. In: Public health England. 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/437433/hpr2215_STI_NCSP_v6.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2016.
  3. 3.
    Meyer S, Trück J, Bosshard P, et al. Congenital syphilis in Switzerland: gone, forgotten, on the return. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;. doi:10.4414/smw.2012.13325.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Syphilis, In: Sexually transmitted diseases surveillance. In: Centres for disease control and prevention. 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats11/syphilis.htm.
  5. 5.
    Eliminating congenital syphilis: A global health priority. In: Geneva World Health Organization.2005.http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/eliminating_congenital_syphilis.pdf.
  6. 6.
    Estreich S, Forster G. Sexually transmitted diseases in children: introduction. Sex Transm Infect. 1992;68(1):2–8. doi:10.1136/sti.68.1.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lomax E. Infantile Syphilis as an Example of Nineteenth Century Belief in the Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1979;XXXIV(1):23–39. doi:10.1093/jhmas/xxxiv.1.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gjestland T. The Oslo study of untreated syphilis: an epidemiologic investigation of the natural course of syphilitic infection based on a restudy of the Boeck-Bruusgaard material. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh). 1955;35:1–368.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gomez G, Kamb M, Newman L, Mark J, Broutet N, Hawkes S. Untreated maternal syphilis and adverse outcomes of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(3):217–26. doi:10.2471/blt.12.107623.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leão J, Gueiros L, Porter S. Oral manifestations of syphilis. Clinics. 2006;61(2):161–6. doi:10.1590/s1807-59322006000200012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hillson S, Grigson C, Bond S. Dental defects of congenital syphilis. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1998;107(1):25–40. doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199809)107:1<25:aid-ajpa3>3.0.co;2-c.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hutchinson J. Clinical lecture on heredito-syphilitic struma: and on the teeth as a means of diagnosis. Br Med J. 1861;1(20):515–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.20.515.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Putkonen T. Dental changes in congenital syphilis. Relationship to other syphilitic stigmata. Acta Derm Venerol. 1962;43:240–9.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bauer W. Tooth buds and jaws with patients with congenital syphilis. Correlation between distribution of Treponema pallidum and tissue reaction. Am J Surg Pathol. 1944;20:297–319.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moon H. On irregular and defective tooth development. Trans Odontol Soc GB. 1877;9:223–43.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fournier A. Syphilitic teeth. Dent Cosmos. 1884;26:12–25.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Waldron T. Henry moon and his molars. Dent Hist. 2014;59:17–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jacobi K, Cook D, Corruccini R, Handler J. Congenital syphilis in the past: slaves at Newton Plantation, Barbados, West Indies. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1992;89(2):145–58. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330890203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fiumara N. Manifestations of late congenital syphilis. An analysis of 271 patients. Arch Dermatol. 1970;102(1):78–83. doi:10.1001/archderm.102.1.78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mayes, et al. Stigmata of congenital syphilis on a high status juvenile at Yuguë, Oaxaca, Mexico. Dent Anthropol. 2009;22:73–84.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crombie F, Manton D, Palamara J, Zalizniak I, Cochrane N, Reynolds E. Characterisation of developmentally hypomineralised human enamel. J Dent. 2013;41(7):611–8. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Head and Neck / Oral Pathology, Guy’s HospitalKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Wellcome Museum of Anatomy and PathologyThe Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandLondonUK

Personalised recommendations