Advertisement

Biomolecular NMR Assignments

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 219–222 | Cite as

Backbone resonance assignments of innate immune evasion protein EapH2 from the S. aureus

  • Alvaro I. Herrera
  • Abhinav Dubey
  • Brian V. Geisbrecht
  • Haribabu Arthanari
  • Om PrakashEmail author
Article
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a ubiquitous and persistent pathogen of humans and livestock. The bacterium disrupts the host’s innate immune system’s ability to recognize and clear bacteria with optimal efficiency by expressing a wide variety of virulence proteins. Two single domain protein homologs (EapH1, EapH2) of the extracellular adherence protein (Eap) have been reported. Eap is a multidomain protein that participates in various protein–protein interactions that inhibit the innate immune response, including both the complement and Neutrophil Serine Proteases (NSPs). EapH1 and EapH2 are also inhibitors of NSPs (Stapels et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:13187–13192, 2014), but lack the ability to inhibit the classical, and lectin pathways of the complement activation system (Woehl et al., J Immunol 193:6161–6171, 2014). We continue the characterization of Eap domains, here with the experiments on EapH2, we acquired a series of 2D and 3D NMR spectra of EapH2 in solution. We completed 99% of expected non-proline backbone 1H, 15N, and 13C resonance assignments of EapH2 and predicted secondary structure via the TALOS-N server. The assignment data have been deposited in the BMRB data bank under Accession Number 27540.

Keywords

Backbone resonance assignment Staphylococcus aureus Virulence protein Extracellular adherence protein homolog (EapH) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by awards from the National Institutes of Health to B.V.G. (GM121511 and AI111203).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Archer GL (1998) Staphylococcus aureus: a well-armed pathogen. Clin Infect Dis 26:1179–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011) 2011 Progress towards implementation of: a public health action plan to combat antimicrobial resistance. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/resources/
  3. de Jong NWM, Ramyar KX, Guerra FE, Nijland R, Fevre C, Voyich JM, McCarthy AJ, Garcia BL, van Kessel KPM, van Strijp JAG, Geisbrecht BV, Haas PJA (2017) Immune evasion by a staphylococcal inhibitor of myeloperoxidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 35:9439–9444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A (1995) NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR 6:277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garcia BL, Zwarthoff SA, Rooijakkers SHM, Geisbrecht BV (2016) Novel evasion mechanisms of the classical complement pathway. J Immunol 197:2051–2060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geisbrecht BV, Hamaoka BY, Perman B, Zemla A, Leahy DJ (2005) The crystal structures of EAP domains from Staphylococcus aureus reveal an unexpected homology to bacterial superantigens. J Biol Chem 280:17243–17250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geisbrecht BV, Bouyan S, Pop M (2006) An optimized system for expression and purification of secreted bacterial proteins. Protein Expr Purif 46:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herrera AI, Ploscariu NT, Geisbrecht BV, Prakash O (2018) 1H, 15N, and 13C resonance assignments of the third domain from the S. aureus innate immune evasion protein Eap. Biomol NMR Assign 12:175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hyberts SG, Milbradt AG, Wagner AB, Arthanari H, Wagner G (2012) Application of iterative soft thresholding for fast reconstruction of NMR data non-uniformly sampled with multidimensional Poisson Gap scheduling. J Biomol NMR 52:315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keller R (2004) The computer aided resonance assignment tutorial. ISBN 3-85600-112-3Google Scholar
  11. Kim HK, Thammavongsa V, Schneewind O, Missiakas D (2012) Recurrent infections and immune evasion strategies of Staphylococcus aureus. Curr Opin Microbiol 15:92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lambris JD, Ricklin D, Geisbrecht BV (2008) Complement evasion by human pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lowy FD (1998) Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 339:550–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shen Y, Bax A (2013) Protein backbone and sidechain torsion angles predicted from NMR chemical shifts using artificial neural networks. J Biomol NMR 56:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Spaan AN, Surewaard BGJ, Nijland R, van Strijp JAG (2013) Neutrophils versus Staphylococcus aureus: a Biological Tug of War. Annu Rev Microbiol 67:629–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stapels DA, Ramyar KX, Bischoff M, von Köckritz-Blickwede M, Milder FJ, Ruyken M, Eisenbeis J, McWhorter WJ, Herrmann M, van Kessel KP, Geisbrecht BV, Rooijakkers SH (2014) Staphylococcus aureus secretes a unique class of neutrophil serine protease inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:13187–13192ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Whitehead B, Craven CJ, Waltho JP (1997) Double and triple resonance NMR methods for protein assignment. In: Reid DG (eds) Protein NMR techniques. Methods in molecular biology, vol 60. Humana Press, TotowaGoogle Scholar
  18. Woehl JL, Stapels DAC, Garcia BL, Ramyar KX, Keightley A, Ruyken M, Syriga M, Sfyroera G, Weber AB, Zolkiewski M, Ricklin D, Lambris JD, Rooijakkers SHM, Geisbrecht BV (2014) The extracellular adherence protein from Staphylococcus aureus inhibits the classical and lectin pathways of complement by blocking formation of the C3 pro-convertase. J Immunol 193:6161–6171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Woehl JL, Takahashi D, Herrera AI, Geisbrecht BV, Prakash O (2016) 1H, 15N, and 13C resonance assignments of Staphylococcus aureus extracellular adherence protein domain 4. Biomol NMR Assign 10:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Woehl JL, Ramyar KX, Katz BB, Walker JK, Geisbrecht BV (2017) The structural basis for inhibition of the classical and lectin complement pathways by S. aureus extracellular adherence protein. Protein Sci 26:1595–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiophysicsKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular PharmacologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations