Advertisement

Biomolecular NMR Assignments

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 75–78 | Cite as

Chemical shift assignments of a camelid nanobody against aflatoxin B1

  • Yao Nie
  • Shuangli Li
  • Jiang Zhu
  • Rui Hu
  • Maili Liu
  • Ting HeEmail author
  • Yunhuang YangEmail author
Article
  • 156 Downloads

Abstract

Nanobodies (Nbs) are the variable domain of the heavy-chain antibodies produced from Camelidae, which possess comparable binding affinities and specificity to conventional antibodies. Nbs have become valuable and versatile tools for numerous biotechnology applications due to their small size (12–15 kDa), high solubility, exceptional stability, and facile genetic manipulation. The interactions between Nbs and protein antigens have been well-studied, but less work has been done to characterize their ability to bind small molecule haptens. Here we present the backbone and side-chain assignments of the 1H, 13C and 15N resonances of Nb26 (123 amino acids), a nanobody that recognizes the hapten aflatoxin B1 (AFB1). These assignments are preliminary work towards the determination of the structure of free Nb26 using NMR spectroscopy, which will provide useful information about the complex structure of “Nb26-AFB1” and the recognition mechanism about how Nb26 binds to AFB1.

Keywords

Camelid antibody Nanobody Aflatoxin B1 NMR spectroscopy Assignment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank for grant supports from the “Hundred Talents Program” of Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 21575155).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bever CS, Dong JX, Vasylieva NM, Barnych B, Cui Y, Xu ZL, Hammock BD, Gee SJ (2016) VHH antibodies: emerging reagents for the analysis of environmental chemicals. Anal Bioanal Chem 408:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Genst E, Silence K, Decanniere K, Conrath K, Loris R, Kinne J, Muyldermans S, Wyns L (2006) Molecular basis for the preferential cleft recognition by dromedary heavy-chain antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:4586–4591ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A (1995) NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on Unix pipes. J Biomol NMR 6:277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goddard TD, Kneller DG (2008) SPARKY 3. University of California, San FransiscoGoogle Scholar
  5. Gonzalez-Sapienza G, Rossotti MA, Rosa ST (2017) Single-domain antibodies as versatile affinity reagents for analytical and diagnostic applications. Front Immunol 8:977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hafsa NE, Wishart DS (2014) CSI 2.0—a significantly improved version of the Chemical Shift Index. J Biomol NMR 60(2–3):131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamers-Casterman C, Atarhouch T, Muyldermans S, Robinson G, Hammers C, Songa EB, Bendahman N, Hammers R (1993) Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains. Nature 363:446–448ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. He T, Wang Y, Li P, Zhang Q, Lei J, Zhang Z, Ding X, Zhou H, Zhang W (2014) Nanobody-based enzyme immunoassay for aflatoxin in agro-products with high tolerance to cosolvent methanol. Anal Chem 86:8873–8880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mitchell LS, Colwell LJ (2018) Comparative analysis of nanobody sequence and structure data. Proteins 86:697–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Muyldermans S (2013) Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies. Annu Rev Biochem 82:775–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Narciso JET, Uy IDC, Cabang AB, Chavez JFC, Pablo JLB, Padilla-Concepcion GP, Padlan EA (2011) Analysis of the antibody structure based on high-resolution crystallographic studies. New Biotechnol 28:435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Saerens D, Conrath K, Govaert J, Muyldermans S (2008) Disulfide bond introduction for general stabilization of immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable domains. J Mol Biol 377:478–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shen Y, Bax A (2015) Protein structural information derived from NMR chemical shift with the neural network program TALOS-N. Methods Mol Biol 1260:17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tabares-da Rosa S, Wogulis LA, Wogulis MD, González-Sapienza G, Wilson DK (2018) Structure and specificity of several triclocarban-binding single domain camelid antibody fragments. J Mol Recognit.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmr.2755 Google Scholar
  15. Vu KB, Ghahroudi MA, Wyns L, Muyldermans S (1997) Comparison of llama VH sequences from conventional and heavy chain antibodies. Mol Immunol 34:1121–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic Molecular Physics, Wuhan Center for Magnetic Resonance, Wuhan Institute of Physics and MathematicsChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations