Biomolecular NMR Assignments

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 133–137 | Cite as

Backbone resonance assignment of the response regulator protein PhoBNF20D from Escherichia coli

  • Xinhui Kou
  • Xinghong Liu
  • Yixiang Liu
  • Conggang Li
  • Maili Liu
  • Ling JiangEmail author


PhoB is a response regulator of the PhoR/PhoB two-component signal transduction system that is involved in the regulation of the phosphate (Pho) regulon of Escherichia coli. PhoB has two domains, receiver domain and effector domain. The receiver domain can be phosphorylated by its cognate histidine kinase PhoR and the phosphorylation induces conformational changes of the full length protein of PhoB that promote the DNA binding and transcription. Three-dimensional crystal structures of PhoB receiver domain (PhoBN) have been solved under apo or BeF3 (a phosphoryl analog) binding forms and it has been found that PhoBN is dimerized in both situations. However, we have found that the apo form of PhoBN has multiple conformational changes in solution that is hard to be distinguished by using NMR spectroscopy, while the mutagenesis of F20D PhoBN gives homogeneous dispersed signals in HSQC spectrum indicating a relatively uniform conformation. Meanwhile the F20D mutant has the same phosphorylation activity as the wild type protein. Here we report the backbone assignment of PhoBNF20D mutant. The chemical shift (HN, N, CO, Cα and Cβ) analysis shows that the predicted regions of secondary structure are in good agreement with those observed in the crystal structure of apo PhoBN. Therefore, the backbone chemical shifts assignment of PhoBNF20D mutant would be useful for studying the structure and dynamics of PhoB receiver domain and it has significance for explaining the mechanism of phosphorylation in TCSs.


Chemical shift assignment NMR PhoBNF20D Secondary structure HSQC 



This project was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China # 21573280 and # 21603268.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Al Zayer M, Stankowska D, Dziedzic R, Sarva K, Madiraju MV, Rajagopalan M (2011) Mycobacterium tuberculosis mtrA merodiploid strains with point mutations in the signal-receiving domain of MtrA exhibit growth defects in nutrient broth. Plasmid 65(3):210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachhawat P, Swapna GV, Montelione GT, Stock AM (2005) Mechanism of activation for transcription factor PhoB suggested by different modes of dimerization in the inactive and active states. Structure 13(9):1353–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bahrami A, Assadi AH, Markley JL, Eghbalnia HR (2009) Probabilistic interaction network of evidence algorithm and its application to complete labeling of peak lists from protein NMR spectroscopy. PLoS Comput Biol 5(3):e1000307ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birck C, Mourey L, Gouet P, Fabry B, Schumacher J, Rousseau P, Kahn D, Samama JP (1999) Conformational changes induced by phosphorylation of the FixJ receiver domain. Structure 7(12):1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckler DR, Zhou Y, Stock AM (2002) Evidence of intradomain and interdomain flexibility in an OmpR/PhoB homolog from Thermotoga maritima. Structure 10(2):153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai SJ, Inouye M (2002) EnvZ-OmpR interaction and osmoregulation in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 277(27):24155–24161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chary KVR, Govil G (2008) NMR in biological systems: from molecules to human. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Creager-Allen RL, Silversmith RE, Bourret RB (2013) A link between dimerization and autophosphorylation of the response regulator PhoB. J Biol Chem 288(30):21755–21769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crepin S, Chekabab SM, Le Bihan G, Bertrand N, Dozois CM, Harel J (2011) The Pho regulon and the pathogenesis of Escherichia coli. Vet Microbiol 153(1–2):82–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A (1995) NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR 6:277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farrow NA, Muhandiram R, Singer AU, Pascal SM, Kay CM, Gish G, Shoelson SE, Pawson T, FormanKay JD, Kay LE (1994) Backbone dynamics of a free and a phosphopeptide-complexed Src homology 2 domain studied by 15N NMR relaxation. Biochemistry 33(19):5984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flashner Y, Keener JKS, Weiss DS (1995) Constitutive forms of the enhancer-binding protein NtrC-evdence that essential oligomerization determinations lie in the central activation domian. J Mol Biol 249(4):700–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao R, Stock AM (2013) Probing kinase and phosphatase activities of two-component systems in vivo with concentration-dependent phosphorylation profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(2):672–677ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mack TR, Gao R, Stock AM (2009) Probing the roles of the two different dimers mediated by the receiver domain of the response regulator PhoB. J Mol Biol 389(2):349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Okamura H, Hanaoka S, Nagadoi A, Makino K, Nishimura Y (2000) Structural comparison of the PhoB and OmpR DNA-binding/transactivation domains and the arrangement of PhoB molecules on the phosphate box. J Mol Biol 295(5):1225–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Solà M, Gomis-Rüth FX, Serrano L, González A, Coll M (1999) Three-dimensional crystal structure of the transcription factor PhoB receiver domain. J Mol Biol 285(2):675–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Solà M, Drew DL, Blanco AG, Gomis-Rüth FX, Coll M (2006) The cofactor-induced pre-active conformation in PhoB. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 62(9):1046–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stock AM, Robinson VL, Goudreau PN (2000) Two-component signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 69:183–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Volkman BF, Nohaile MJ, Amy NK, Kustu S, Wemmer DE (1995) Three-dimensional solution structure of the N-terminal receiver domain of NTRC. Biochemistry 34(4):1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Waugh DS (1996) Genetic tools for selective labeling of proteins with α-15 N-amino acids. J Biomol NMR 8(2):184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wolanin PM, Webre DJ, Stock JB (2003) Mechanism of phosphatase activity in the chemotaxis response regulator CheY. Biochemistry 42(47):14075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang S, Delaglio F, Cornilescu G, Bax A (2009) TALOS+: a hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts. J Biomol NMR 44(4):213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zschiedrich CP, Keidel V, Szurmant H (2016) Molecular mechanisms of two-component signal transduction. J Mol Biol 428(19):3752–3775CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Wuhan Institute of Physics and MathematicsThe Chinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.Graduate University of Chinese Academy of ScienceBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations