Skip to main content
Log in

Construing the Legality of Solitary Confinement: Analysis of United States Federal Court Jurisprudence

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes the constitutional parameters of solitary confinement, administrative segregation, and/or punitive isolation within correctional facilities in the United States. After briefly discussing the harmful effects of isolation and the number of inmates subject to this type of confinement, it explains the U.S. Supreme Court’s “atypical and significant hardship” standard for assessing the legality of segregation. Evaluation of 68 cases decided by the 12 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals reveals how each Circuit decides when conditions of segregation amount to an “atypical and significant hardship” for the inmate, creating a liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process clause. Due to the Supreme Court’s ambiguity, the Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals lack agreement on (1) when liberty interests attach and (2) which confinement conditions outside of segregation should serve as a comparison baseline to assess “atypicality” and “hardship.” While inmates possess limited liberty interests when placed in segregation, the physical and psychological harms wrought by segregation, isolation, and solitary confinement are rarely considered when courts make constitutional determinations of such practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen-Bell, A. (2012). Perception, profiling, and prolonged solitary confinement viewed through the lens of the Angola 3 case: When prison officials become judges, judges become visually challenged, and justice becomes legally blind. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 39, 763–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. (2015). Use of restrictive housing in U.S. prisons and jails, 2011-12. U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. NCJ 249209. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/urhuspj1112.pdf.

  • Binelli, M. (2015, March 26). Inside America’s toughest federal prison. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved June 11, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/29/magazine/inside-americas-toughest-federal-prison.html.

  • Campbell, M. (2016). Vulnerable and inadequately protected: Solitary confinement, individuals with mental illness, and the laws that fail to protect. Hofstra Law Review, 45, 263–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freckelton, I. (2011). Cruel and unusual punishment of prisoners with mental illnesses: From oates to plata. Psychiatry, Psychology, & Law, 18, 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, N. and Monteiro, C. (2016). Administrative segregation in U.S. prisons. (DOJ, National Institute of Justice), 1–38, Retrieved March 1, 2017, from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/249749.pdf.

  • Grassian, S. (1983). (1983). Psychopathological effects of solitary confinement. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 1450–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassian, S. (2006). Psychiatric effects of solitary confinement. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 22, 325–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, B. et al. (2017). History of solitary confinement is associated with post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms among individuals recently released from prison. Journal of Urban Health. 95, 141–148. First online. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1

  • Haney, C. (2003). Mental health issues in long-term solitary and “supermax” confinement. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 124–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C. (2018). Restricting the use of solitary confinement. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 285–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C., & Lynch, M. (1997). Regulating prisons of the future: A psychological analysis of supermax and solitary confinement. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 23, 477–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, L. (2017, November 5). Guiding principles and liability reduction with a viable suicide prevention program. Presentation to the National Commission on Correctional Health Care conference, held in Chicago, IL.

  • Henderson, G. (2015). Disciplinary segregation: How the punitive solitary confinement policy in federal prisons violates the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment in spite of Sandin v. Conner. Marquette Law Review, 99, 477–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (2016). Solitary confinement until death by state-sponsored homicide: An Eighth Amendment assessment of the modern execution process. Washington & Lee Law Review, 73, 1213–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, R. (1988). The effects of confinement in the high security unit at Lexington. Social Justice, 15, 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupers, T. A. (2017). Solitary: The inside story of supermax isolation and how we can abolish it. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G., & Prabhu, M. (2015). A reflection on the madness in prisons. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 26, 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, E. (2015). Toward a standard of meaningful review: Examining the actual protections afforded to prisoners in long-term solitary confinement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 163, 1159–1198.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, K., Austin, J., Becker, K., Fields, L., Lane, M., Maloney, M.,… Felix, T. (2014). Federal bureau of prisons: Special housing unit review and assessment. Arlington, VA: CNA. Retrieved March 2, 2017, from https://www.bop.gov/resources/news/pdfs/CNA-SHUReportFinal_123014_2.pdf.

  • National Commission on Correctional Health Care. (2016). Position statement: Solitary confinement (Isolation). Chicago: National Commission on Correctional Health Care. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from https://www.ncchc.org/filebin/Positions/Solitary-Confinement-Isolation.pdf.

  • Nolasco, C., del Carmen, R. V., Steinmetz, K., Vaughn, M., & Spaic, A. (2015). Building legal competency: Foundations for a more effective criminology and criminal justice discipline. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(3), 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolasco, C., Vaughn, M., & del Carmen, R. (2010). Toward a new methodology for legal research in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B. (2016, January 25). Why we must rethink solitary confinement. Washington Post. Retrieve November 8, 2017, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/barack-obama-why-we-must-rethink-solitary-confinement/2016/01/25/29a361f2-c384-11e5-8965-0607e0e265ce_story.html?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.036dbf6a6318.

  • O'Keefe, M. L. (2008). Administrative segregation from within: A corrections perspective. The Prison Journal, 88(1), 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, K. (2016). 23/7: Pelican Bay prison and the rise of long-term solitary confinement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, A., Fazel, S., Marzano, L., & Hawton, K. (2013). The suicidal process in male prisoners making near-lethal suicide attempts. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.631540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shames, A., Wilcox, J., & Subramanian, R. (2015, May). Solitary confinement: Common misconceptions and emerging safe alternatives. New York: VERA Institute of Justice. Retrieved February 28, 2017, from https://storage.googleapis.com/vera-web-assets/downloads/Publications/solitary-confinement-common-misconceptions-and-emerging-safe-alternatives/legacy_downloads/solitary-confinement-misconceptions-safe-alternatives-report_1.pdf.

  • Smith, P. (2006). The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates: A brief history and review of the literature. Crime & Justice, 34, 441–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2016). Report and recommendations concerning the use of restrictive housing: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Retrieved March 5, 2017, from https://www.justice.gov/archives/dag/file/815551/download.

  • U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government, Budget. (2015, March 23). Budget hearing: The Supreme Court of the United States, FY 2016 Budget. Video of Justices Kennedy and Breyer testifying. Retrieved March 6, 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spLCISTFF9k.

Cases Cited

  • Abbott v. McCotter, 13 F.3d 1439 (10th Cir. 1994).

  • Ajaj v. United States, 293 Fed.Appx. 575 (10th Cir. 2008).

  • Allah v. Bartowski, 574 Fed.Appx. 135 (3rd Cir. 2014).

  • Arce v. Walker, 139 F.3d 329 (2nd Cir.1998).

  • Aref v. Lynch, 833 F.3d 242 (D.C. Cir. 2016).

  • Bailey v. Fisher, 647 Fed.Appx. 472 (5th Cir. 2016).

  • Bass v. Perrin, 170 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 1999).

  • Bell v. Wilkinson, 145 Fed.Appx. 169 (6th Cir. 2005).

  • Benjamin v. Fraser, 264 F.3d 175 (2nd Cir. 2001).

  • Beverati v. Smith, 120 F.3d 500 (4th Cir. 1997).

  • Bingham v. Thomas, 654 F.3d 1171 (11th Cir. 2011).

  • Brooks v. DiFasi, 112 F.3d 46 (2nd Cir. 1997).

  • Brown v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections, 751 F.3d 983 (9th Cir. 2014).

  • Burnette v. Fahey, 687 F.3d 171 (4th Cir.2012).

  • Burns v. Pa. Dep’t. of Corr., 642 F.3d 163 (3rd Cir.2001).

  • Bryan v. Duckworth, 88 F.3d 431 (7th Cir. 1996).

  • Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818 (5th Cir.1997).

  • Cf. Reardon v. United States, 947 F.2d 1509 (1st Cir. 1991).

  • Chappell v. Mandeville, 706 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2013).

  • Colon v. Howard, 215 F.3d 227 (2nd Cir. 2000).

  • Cruz v. Forrest, 350 Fed.Appx. 900 (5th Cir. 2009).

  • Davis v. Ayala, 135 S.Ct. 2187 (2015).

  • Deberry v. Davis, 460 Fed.Appx. 796 (10th Cir. 2012).

  • Delgiudice, Jr. v. Primus, 679 Fed.Appx. 944 (11th Cir. 2017).

  • Diaz v. Canino, 502 Fed.Appx. 214 (3rd Cir. 2012).

  • Duffy v. Riveland, 98 F.3d 447 (9th Cir. 1996).

  • Earl v. Racine Cnty. Jail, 718 F.3d 689 (7th Cir. 2013).

  • Estate of DiMarco v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, 473 F.3d 1334 (10th Cir. 2007).

  • Evans v. Vinson, 427 Fed.Appx. 437 (6th Cir. 2011).

  • Fantone v. Latini, 780 F.3d 184 (3rd Cir. 2015).

  • Fogle v. Pierson, 435 F.3d 1252 (10th Cir. 2006).

  • Furrow v. Marberry, 412 Fed.Appx. 880 (7th Cir. 2011).

  • Gaines v. Stenseng, 292 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir. 2002).

  • Giano v. Selsky, 238 F.3d 223 (2nd Cir. 2001).

  • Goff v. Burton, 7 F.3d 734 (8th Cir.1993).

  • Gowadia v. Stearns, 596 Fed.Appx. 667 (10th Cir. 2014).

  • Greenholtz v. Inmates, 442 U.S. 1 (1979).

  • Griffin v. Vaughn, 112 F.3d 703 (3rd Cir. 1997).

  • Hallman v. Cate, 483 Fed.Appx. 381 (9th Cir. 2012).

  • Harbin–Bey v. Rutter, 420 F.3d 571 (6th Cir. 2005).

  • Harden–Bey v. Rutter, 524 F.3d 789 (6th Cir. 2008).

  • Hardaway v. Meyerhoff, 734 F.3d 740 (7th Cir. 2013).

  • Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982).

  • Harris v. Caruso, 465 Fed.Appx. 481 (6th Cir. 2012).

  • Hatch v. District of Columbia, 184 F.3d 846 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

  • Heard v. Caruso, 351 Fed.Appx. 1 (6th Cir. 2009).

  • Hernandez v. Velasquez, 522 F.3d 556 (5th Cir. 2008).

  • Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460 (1983).

  • Hill v. Fleming, 173 Fed.Appx. 664 (10th Cir. 2006).

  • Holly v. Woolfolk, 415 F.3d 678 (7th Cir. 2005).

  • Hope v. Pelzer, 536 U.S. 730 (2002).

  • Hoskins v. Lenear, 395 F.3d 372 (7th Cir. 2005).

  • Huff v. Thaler, 518 Fed.Appx. 311 (5th Cir. 2013).

  • Incumaa v. Stirling, 791 F.3d 517 (4th Cir. 2015).

  • In re Long Term Admin. Segregation, 174 F.3d 464 (4th Cir. 1999).

  • In re Medley, 134 U.S. 160 (1890).

  • Iqbal v. Hasty, 490 F.3d 143 (2nd Cir. 2007).

  • Jago v. Van Curen, 454 U.S. 14 (1981).

  • Jimenez v. McQueen, 460 Fed.Appx. 458 (5th Cir. 2012).

  • Jones v. Baker, 155 F.3d 810 (6th Cir. 1998).

  • Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 191 Fed.Appx. 639 (10th Cir. 2006).

  • Joseph v. Curtin, 410 Fed.Appx. 865 (6th Cir. 2010).

  • Kalwasinski v. Morse, 201 F.3d 103 (2nd Cir. 1999).

  • Keck v. Zenon, 240 Fed.Appx. 815 (10th Cir. 2007).

  • Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083 (9th Cir. 1996), amended by, 135 F.3d 1318 (9th Cir. 1998).

  • Lagerstrom v. Kingston, 463 F.3d 621 (7th Cir. 2006).

  • Lekas v. Briley, 405 F.3d 602 (7th Cir. 2005).

  • Lovelace v. Lee, 472 F.3d 174 (4th Cir. 2006).

  • Luken v. Scott, 71 F.3d 192 (5th Cir. 1995).

  • Magluta v. Samples, 375 F.3d 1269 (11th Cir. 2004).

  • Marion v. Columbia Corr. Inst., 559 F.3d 693 (7th Cir. 2009).

  • Marshall v. Ormand, 572 Fed.Appx. 659 (10th Cir. 2014).

  • Martin v. Scott, 156 F.3d 578 (1998).

  • McAdams v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, 561 Fed.Appx. 718 (10th Cir. 2014).

  • McCord v. Maggio, 910 F.2d 1248 (5th Cir. 1990), after remand, 927 F.2d 844 (5th Cir.1991).

  • McKeithan v. Beard, 322 Fed.Appx. 194 (3rd Cir. 2009).

  • McQuillion v. Duncan, 306 F.3d 895 (9th Cir. 2002).

  • Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215 (1976).

  • Means v. Larson, 580 Fed.Appx. 481 (7th Cir. 2014).

  • Meriwether v. Faulkner, 821 F.2d 408 (7th Cir.1987).

  • Mitchell v. Dupnik, 75 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 1996).

  • Moody v. Baker, 857 F.2d 256 (5th Cir. 1988).

  • Mujahid v. Meyer, 59 F.3d 931 (9th Cir. 1995).

  • Murphy v. Mo. Dep’t. of Corr., 372 F.3d 979 (8th Cir. 2004).

  • Myron v. Terhune, 476 F.3d 716 (9th Cir. 2007).

  • Obriecht v. Raemisch, 565 Fed.Appx. 535 (7th Cir. 2014).

  • Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238 (1983).

  • Oliver v. Scott, 276 F.3d 736 (5th Cir. 2002).

  • Orellana v. Kyle, 65 F.3d 29 (5th Cir. 1995).

  • Orr v. Larkins, 610 F.3d 1032 (8th Cir. 2010).

  • Palmer v. Richards, 364 F.3d 60 (2nd Cir. 2004).

  • Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009).

  • Penrod v. Zavaras, 94 F.3d 1399 (10th Cir. 1996).

  • Perkins v. Kansas Dep’t. of Corr., 165 F.3d 803 (10th Cir. 1999).

  • Pichardo v. Kinker, 73 F.3d 612 (5th Cir. 1996).

  • Porter v. Bowen, 496 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2007).

  • Price v. Johnston, 334 U.S. 266 (1948).

  • Prieto v. Clarke, 780 F.3d 245 (4th Cir. 2015).

  • Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850 (9th Cir. 2003).

  • Rezaq v. Nalley, 677 F.3d 1001 (10th Cir. 2012).

  • Richardson v. Runnels, 594 F.3d 666 (9th Cir. 2010).

  • Rimmer-Bey v. Brown, 62 F.3d 789 (6th Cir.1995).

  • Rodgers v. Singletary, 142 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 1998).

  • Rodriguez v. Pearson, 473 Fed.Appx. 728 (9th Cir. 2012).

  • Rollins v. Cain, 2011 WL 13121389 (5th Cir. 2011).

  • Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472 (1995).

  • Saylor v. Nebraska, 812 F.3d 637 (8th Cir. 2016).

  • Schwenk v. Hartford, 204 F.3d 1187 (9th Cir. 2000).

  • Serrano v. Francis, 345 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2003).

  • Shoats v. Horn, 213 F.3d 140 (3rd Cir. 2000).

  • Skinner v. Cunningham, 430 F.3d 483 (1st Cir. 2005).

  • Smith v. Birkey, 447 Fed.Appx. 744 (7th Cir. 2011).

  • Smith v. Deemer, 641 Fed.Appx. 865 (11th Cir. 2016).

  • Smith v. Regional Director of Florida, 368 Fed.Appx. 9 (11th Cir. 2010).

  • Stallings v. Werholtz, 492 Fed.Appx. 841 (10th Cir. 2012).

  • Stephens v. Cottey, 145 Fed.Appx. 179 (7th Cir. 2005).

  • Suarez v. Palomino, 590 Fed.Appx. 733 (10th Cir. 2014).

  • Tellier v. Fields, 280 F.3d 69 (2d Cir. 2000).

  • Templeman v. Gunter, 16 F.3d 367 (10th Cir.1994).

  • Toston v. Thurmer, 689 F.3d 828 (7th Cir. 2012).

  • Townsend v. Cooper, WL 12871896 (E.D. Wisc. 2012), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 759 F.3d 678 (7th Cir. 2014).

  • Townsend v. Fuchs, 522 F.3d 765 (7th Cir. 2008).

  • Trujillo v. Williams, 465 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2006).

  • Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987).

  • Turner v. Warden, 650 Fed.Appx. 695 (11th Cir. 2016).

  • United States v. King, 687 F.3d 1189 (9th Cir. 2012).

  • United States v. Rahman, 189 F.3d 88 (2nd Cir. 1999).

  • United States v. Rezaq, 134 F.3d 1121 (D.C. Cir. 1998).

  • Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480 (1980).

  • Wagner v. Hanks, 128 F.3d 1173 (7th Cir. 1997).

  • Watkins v. Lnu, 547 Fed.Appx. 409 (5th Cir. 2013).

  • Whitford v. Boglino, 63 F.3d 527 (7th Cir. 1995).

  • Wilkerson v. Stalder, 329 F.3d 431 (2003).

  • Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209 (2005).

  • Wilkerson v. Stalder, WL 6665452 (M.D. La. 2013), aff’d, Wilkerson v. Goodwin, 774 F.3d 845 (5th Cir. 2014).

  • Williams v. Fountain, 77 F.3d 372 (11th Cir. 1996).

  • Williams v. Lindamood, 526 Fed.Appx. 559 (6th Cir. 2013).

  • Williams v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 848 F.3d 549 (3rd Cir. 2017).

  • Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974).

Laws Cited

  • U.S. Constitution Amendment XIV.

  • Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3626(a)(1)(A).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Angelique Nolasco.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 1 Comparison of circuit courts’analysis of liberty interest, atypical and significant hardship, and baseline of comparison

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nolasco, C.A., Vaughn, M.S. Construing the Legality of Solitary Confinement: Analysis of United States Federal Court Jurisprudence. Am J Crim Just 44, 812–835 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5

Keywords

Navigation