Predicting Fear of Crime: Results from a Community Survey of a Small City
Several studies have examined predictors surrounding fear of crime. Fear of crime has generally been conceptualized as an affective emotional state regarding concern over victimization or as a cognitive state of perceived risk of victimization. While there are many potential predictors of fear of crime, there are two main groups of predictors: individual demographics and neighborhood physical and social disorder. Previous research has predominantly focused on large, urban cities. Less research has been published surrounding smaller cities and towns. As such, the current study involved a mailed household survey of a small city of around 80,000 residents in Pennsylvania. The study examined demographic predictors in line with the vulnerability model and neighborhood contextual predictors of residents’ fear of crime associated with the incivilities model. While the main analyses employed a more affective measure of fear of crime, a supplementary analysis using a measure of perceived neighborhood crime problems was examined as well. Findings revealed that in line with previous research, females and minorities were more likely to be fearful of crime. However, less favorable views of local police, more physical disorder, and more social disorder were also related to greater fear of crime and accounted for a much larger proportion of the variance explaining fear of crime. Supplementary findings strongly supported the importance of neighborhood contextual factors in predicting perceptions of crime problems, including the views of police, physical, and social disorder. However, no demographic factors predicted perceived neighborhood crime problems. Implications and limitations of the study findings are discussed.
KeywordsFear of crime Neighborhood disorder Vulnerability model Perceived crime problems
This study was funded entirely by DeSales University.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Baumer, T. L. (1978). Research on fear of crime in the United States. Victimology, 3, 254–264.Google Scholar
- Blakely, E. J., & Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Bursik Jr., R. J., & Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Dowler, K. (2003). Media consumption and public attitudes toward crime and justice: The relationship between fear of crime, punitive attitudes, and perceived police effectiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 10, 109–126.Google Scholar
- Ferraro, K. (1995). Fear of crime: Interpreting victimization and risk. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
- Frustenberg, F. (1971). Public reaction to crime in the streets. American Scholar, 40, 601–610.Google Scholar
- Gramlick, J. 2018. 5 facts about crime in the U.S. pew research center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/01/30/5-facts-about-crime-in-the-u-s/
- Hagan, F. E. (2006). Research methods in criminal justice and criminology, 7e. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Holbrook, A. L., Krosnick, J. A., & Pfent, A. (2008). The causes and consequences of response rates in surveys by the news media and government contractor survey research firms. In J. M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, J. M. Brick, E. de Leeuw, L. Japec, P. J. Lavrakas, M. W. Link, & R. L. Sangster (Eds.), advances in telephone survey methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..Google Scholar
- Pickett, J. T. (2017). Methodological myths and the role of appeals in criminal justice journals: The case of response rates. ACJS Today, 41, 61–69.Google Scholar
- Pickett, J., Cullen, F., Bushway, S., Chiricos, T., & Alpert, G. (2018). The response rate test: Nonresponse bias and the future of survey research in criminology and criminal justice. The Criminologist, 43, 7–11.Google Scholar
- Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1999). Disorder and decay: The concept and measurement of perceived neighborhood disorder. Urban Affairs Review, 34, 412–432.Google Scholar
- Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “Broken Windows”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 319–342.Google Scholar
- Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Skogan, W. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Skogan, W. G., & Maxfield, M. G. (1981). Coping with crime. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Warr, M. (1984). Fear of victimization: Why are women and the elderly more afraid? Sociological Science Quarterly, 6, 681–702.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly, February, 46–52.Google Scholar