Advertisement

American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 102–119 | Cite as

Adding Security, but Subtracting Safety? Exploring Schools’ use of Multiple Visible Security Measures

  • Emily E. Tanner-Smith
  • Benjamin W. Fisher
  • Lynn A. Addington
  • Joseph H. Gardella
Article

Abstract

In response to continued concerns over crime and violence, schools are increasingly employing visible security measures such as cameras, metal detectors, and security personnel. These security measures are not mutually exclusive, but few studies have considered the relationship between the use of multiple forms of security and youth’s exposure to drugs, fighting, property crime, and firearms at school. To address this issue, we analyzed nationally representative school administrator-reported data from the School Survey on Crime & Safety, using a quasi-experimental design with propensity scores to adjust for potential confounding factors. The results indicated that utilization of multiple security measures reduced the likelihood of exposure to property crime in high schools, but most other security utilization patterns were associated with poorer school safety outcomes. Our findings provide guidance to policymakers in considering whether to use – or expand – visible school security measures in schools.

Keywords

School safety School security School surveillance School violence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education, under Grant R305A120181 to Vanderbilt University. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Addington, L. A. (2003). Students' fear after columbine: Findings from a randomized experiment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 367–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addington, L. A. (2009). Cops and cameras: Public school security as a policy response to columbine. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1426–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahrens, D. (2012). Schools, cyberbullies, and the surveillance state. American Criminal Law Review, 49, 1669–1722.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, L. M. (2008). Policing the schools: An evaluation of the North Carolina school resource officer program. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and theses. (3326961).Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blankenau, J., & Leeper, M. (2003). Public school search policies and the “politics of sin.” Policy Studies Journal, 31, 565–584.Google Scholar
  7. Bracy, N. L. (2011). Student perceptions of high-security school environments. Youth and Society, 43(1), 365–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brady, K. P., Balmer, S., & Phenix, D. (2007). School-police partnership effectiveness in urban schools: An analysis of New York City's impact schools initiative. Education and Urban Society, 39, 455–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, B. (2005). Controlling crime and delinquency in the schools: An exploratory study of student perceptions of school security measures. Journal of School Violence, 4, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Burrow, J. D., & Apel, R. (2008). Youth behavior, school structure, and student risk of victimization. Justice Quarterly, 25, 349–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casella, R. (2003). The false allure of security technologies. Social Justice, 30, 82–93.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook, P. J., Gottfredson, D. C., & Na, C. (2010). School crime control and prevention. Crime and Justice, 39, 313–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devine, J. (1995). Can metal detectors replace the panopticon? Cultural Anthropology, 10, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devine, J. (1996). Maximum security: The culture of violence in inner-city schools. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Devlin, D. N., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2016). The roles of police officers in schools: Effects on the recording and reporting of crime. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, online first. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016680405
  18. Finley, L. L. (2006). Examining school searches as systemic violence. The Journal of Human Justice, 14, 117–135.Google Scholar
  19. Finn, P., McDevitt, J., Lassiter, W., Shively, M., & Rich, T. (2005). Case studies of 19 school resource officer (SRO) programs. Washington, D. C: U.S. Department of Justice.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher, B. W., Gardella, J. H., & Tanner-Smith, E. E. (2016). Control in schools: The relationship between school security measures and informal social control mechanisms. Manuscript under review. Google Scholar
  21. Fuentes, A. (2011). Lockdown high: When the schoolhouse becomes a jailhouse. Brooklyn: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  22. Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2013). Bullied children and psychosomatic problems: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 132, 720–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gottfredson, D. C. (2001). Schools and delinquency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gottfredson, G. D., Gottfredson, D. C., Payne, A. A., & Gottfredson, N. (2005). School climate predictors of school disorder: Results from a national study of delinquency prevention in schools. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 412–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2009). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications (Vol. 12). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Henry, S. (2009). School violence beyond columbine: A complex problem in need of an interdisciplinary analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1246–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hirano, K., & Imbens, G. W. (2004). The propensity score with continuous treatments. In A. G. X. L. Meng (Ed.), Applied Bayesian modeling and causal inference from incomplete-data perspectives (pp. 73–84). Chihester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..Google Scholar
  29. Hirschfield, P. J. (2008). Preparing for prison? The criminalization of school discipline in the USA. Theoretical Criminology, 12(1), 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Imai, K., & Van Dyk, D. A. (2004). Causal inference with general treatment regimes: Generalizing the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 854–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Irwin, K., Davidson, J., & Hall-Sanchez, A. (2013). The race to punish in American schools: Class and race predictors of punitive school-crime control. Critical Criminology, 21, 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson, A. (2002). Police-school resource officers’ and students’ perception of the police and offending. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25, 631–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, I. M. (1999). School violence: The effectiveness of a school resource officer program in a southern city. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim, C. Y. (2012). Policing school discipline. Brooklyn Law Review, 77, 861–903.Google Scholar
  35. Kim, C. Y., Losen, D. J., & Hewitt, D. T. (2010). The school-to-prison pipeline: Structuring legal reform. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Krezmien, M. P., Leone, P. E., & Achilles, G. M. (2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L., Mercy, J., Zwi, A., & Lozano, R. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  38. Kupchik, A. (2010). Homeroom security: School discipline in an age of fear. New York: NYU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kupchik, A., & Bracy, N. L. (2009). The news media on school crime and violence: Constructing dangerousness and fueling fear. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7, 136–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kupchik, A., & Ward, G. (2014). Race, poverty, and exclusionary school security: An empirical analysis of U.S. elementary, middle, and high schools. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 12, 332–354.Google Scholar
  41. Madfis, E. (2016). “It’s better to overreact”: School officials’ fear and perceived risk of rampage attacks and the criminalization of American public schools. Critical Criminology, 24, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mayer, M. J., & Leone, P. (1999). A structural analysis of school violence and disruption: Implications for creating safer schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 333–356.Google Scholar
  43. Na, C., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2013). Police officers in schools: Effects on school crime and the processing of offending behaviors. Justice Quarterly, 30, 619–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Noguera, P. A. (1995). Preventing and producing violence: A critical analysis of responses to school violence. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Piro, J. M. (2008). Foucault and the architecture of surveillance: Creating regimes of power in schools, shrines, and society. Educational Studies, 44, 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robers, S., Zhang, A., Morgan, R. E., & Musu-Gillette, L. (2015). Indicators of School crime and safety: 2014 (NCES 2015–072/NCJ 248036). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  47. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ruddy, S. A., Neiman, S., Bauer, L., Hryczaniuk, C. A., Thomas, T. L., & Parmer, R. J. (2010). 2007–08 school survey on crime and safety (SSOCS): Survey documentation for restricted-used data file users (NCES 2010–308). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  49. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  51. Simon, J. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Skiba, R. J., & Peterson, R. L. (2000). School discipline at a crossroads: From zero tolerance to early response. Exceptional Children, 2000, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Squelch, J., & Squelch, A. (2005). Webcams in schools: A privacy menace or a useful monitoring tool. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Law & Education, 10, 55–66.Google Scholar
  54. Steinka-Fry, K. T., Fisher, B. W., & Tanner-Smith, E. E. (2016). Typologies and predictors of visible school security measures across diverse middle and high school settings. Journal of Applied Security Research, 11, 422–436.Google Scholar
  55. Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (2014). Identifying baseline covariates for use in propensity scores: A novel approach illustrated for a nonrandomized study of recovery high schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 89, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. The White House. (2013). Now is the time (pp. 1–15). Washington, D.C.: The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/wh_now_is_the_time_full.pdf.Google Scholar
  57. Theriot, M. T. (2009). School resource officers and the criminalization of student behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Theriot, M. T. (2016). The impact of school resource officer interaction on students’ feelings about school and school police. Crime & Delinquency, 62, 446–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ttofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., Lösel, F., & Loeber, R. (2011). Do the victims of school bullies tend to become depressed later in life? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 3, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Warnick, B. R. (2007). Surveillance cameras in schools: An ethical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 77, 317–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Watts, I. E., & Erevelles, N. (2004). These deadly times: Reconceptualizing school violence by using critical race theory and disability studies. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilkerson, D. M. H. (2001). The relationship between the school resource officer and patterns of suspensions from school due to violence, gang activity and substance/alcohol abuse (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Saint Louis University.Google Scholar
  63. Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhang, A., Musu-Gillette, L., & Oudekerk, B. A. (2016). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2015 (NCES 2016–079/NCJ 249758). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Peabody Research Institute, Department of Human and Organizational DevelopmentVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Justice, Law & CriminologyAmerican UniversityWashingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Human and Organizational DevelopmentVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations