The “Tough on Crime” Competition: a Network Approach to Understanding the Social Mechanisms Leading to Federal Crime Control Legislation in the United States from 1973–2014
The increase in punitive sentiment in America over the last four decades is frequently attributed to changes in criminal justice policies and programs. While scholars have studied the impact of legislation and policy on justice system outcomes, less attention has focused on the role of political actors in legislative bodies who are largely responsible for enacting criminal justice legislation. The current study addresses this gap by examining the social organization of federal crime control policy in the U.S. Congress over a forty-two year period (1973–2014). Drawing from research on social network mechanisms, we examine whether crime control legislation was more politically attractive relative to other legislative topics, and whether Democrats and Republicans pursue these policies by working together or competing against each other. Our results provide novel insight into the mechanisms that contributed to the punitive movement at the federal level.
KeywordsSocial network analysis Crime control Congress Homophily Mechanism Exponential random graph model
- Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, H.R. 4472, 109th Cong. (2006). Retrieved from http://beta.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/House-bill/4472.
- Anderson, J. E. (1990). Public policymaking: An introduction. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Beckett, K. (1997). Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Computer Crime Enforcement Act, H.R. 2816, 106th Cong. (2000). Retrieved from http://beta.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/House-bill/2816.
- Cronin, T. E., Cronin, T. Z., & Milakovich, M. E. (1981). The U.S. versus crime in the streets. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Cullen, F. T., Clark, G. A., & Wozniak, J. F. (1985). Explaining the get tough movement: Can the public be blamed? Federal Probation, 49(2), 16–24.Google Scholar
- Dagan, D., & Teles, S. M. (2016). Prison break: Why conservatives turned against mass incarceration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Federal Law Enforcement Dependents Assistance Act of 1996, S. 2101, 104th Cong. (1996). Retrieved from http://beta.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/senate-bill/2101.
- Gallup (2016). In U.S., concern about crime climbs to 15-year high. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/190475/americans-concern-crime-climbs-year-high.aspx.
- Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Geyer, C. J., & Thompson, E. A. (1992). Constrained Monte Carlo maximum likelihood for dependent data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 54, 657–699.Google Scholar
- Goldwater, B. (1964). Acceptance speech. 28th Republican National Convention. Retrived from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/daily/may98/goldwaterspeech.htm.
- Handcock, M.S., Hunter, D., Butts, C.T., Goodreau, S.M., & Morris, M. (2003). statnet: An R package for the statistical modeling of social networks. Web page http://www.csde.washington.edu/statnet.
- Handcock, M.S., Robins, G., Snijders, T., Moody, J., Besag, J. (2003). Assessing degeneracy in statistical models of social networks, Center for Statistics and the social sciences. Working paper no. 39.Google Scholar
- Harrison Act of 1914, Pub. L. No. 63–223, 38 Stat. 785.Google Scholar
- Hatch, O. G. (1993). The role of congress in sentencing: The United States sentencing Commission, mandatory minimum sentences, and the search for a certain and effective sentencing system. Wake Forest Law Review, 28(1), 185–198.Google Scholar
- Kappeler, V. K., Blumberg, M., & Potter, G. W. (1994). The mythology of crime and criminal justice. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press Inc..Google Scholar
- King, R., Mauer, M., & Young, M. (2005). Incarceration and crime: A complex relationship. Washington, D.C.: The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
- Lazersfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger (Ed.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
- Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., & Robins, G. (2013). Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lynch, M. (2010). Sunbelt justice: Arizona and the transformation of American punishment. Stanford: Stanford Law Books.Google Scholar
- Marion, N. E. (1994). A history of federal crime control initiatives: 1960–1993. Westport: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
- Matusow, A. J. (1984). The unraveling of America: A history of liberalism in the 1960s. New York: Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
- President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). The challenge of crime in a free society. Washington, D.C: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- REDEEM Act, S. 2567, 113th Cong. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/2567.
- Roberts, J. V. (1992). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 99–180). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Scheingold, S. A. (1991). The politics of street crime: Criminal process and cultural obsession. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- Simon, J. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Snijders, T. A. B. (2002). Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models. Journal of Social Structure, 3(2), 1–40.Google Scholar
- Stemen, D., Rengifo, A., & Wilson, J. (2006). Of fragmentation and ferment: The impact of state sentencing policies on incarceration rates, 1975–2002. Washington, D.C.: Final Report to the US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Stinchcombe, A. L., Adams, R., Heimer, C. A., Scheppele, K. L., Smith, T. W., & Taylor, D. C. (1980). Crime and punishment in America: Changing attitudes in America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- The Sentencing Project (2012). The expanding federal prison population. Retrieved from http://www.sentencingproject.org/detail/publication.cfm?publication_id=342&id=156.
- Tonry, M. (1995). Malign neglect: Race, crime, and punishment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Tonry, M. (2004). Thinking about crime: Sense and sensibility in American penal culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Truman, D. (1959). The congressional party: A case study. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Volstead Act of 1919, Pub. L. No. 66–66, 41 Stat. 305.Google Scholar
- Wang, P. (2013). Exponential random graph model extensions: Models for multiple networks and bipartite networks. In D. Lusher, J. Koskinen, & G. Robins (Eds.), Exponential random graph models for social networks (pp. 115–129). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Wise, C. R. (1991). The dynamics of legislation: Leadership and policy change in the congressional process. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar