American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 148–169 | Cite as

Religious Motivated Hate Crimes: Reporting to Law Enforcement and Case Outcomes

  • Scott M. Walfield
  • Kelly M. Socia
  • Ráchael A. Powers
Article

Abstract

Relative to non-bias motivated crimes, hate crimes have much graver consequences for victims and their community. Despite the large increase in religious hate crimes over the past decade relative to all other hate crime, little is known about these types of crimes and the factors associated with both reporting to law enforcement and case outcomes. Utilizing the National Crime Victimization Survey and National Incident-Based Reporting System datasets, this study examines the relationship between victim, offender, and incident characteristics on reporting to law enforcement and case outcomes. Most religious hate crimes are not reported (41.3 %) in part due to perceptions of law enforcement’s perceived response. Of the violent incidents that are reported, the vast majority do not result in the arrest of an offender (22.2 %). Whereas only a small number of variables related to the seriousness of the offense are associated with both reporting and arrest, these exhibited large effect sizes.

Keywords

Hate crimes Religious bias Reporting to law enforcement Arrest 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice under Grant No. 2013-R2-CX-0033. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice.

References

  1. Abramovsky, A. (1991). Bias crime: A call for alternative responses. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 19, 875–914.Google Scholar
  2. Abu-Ras, W. M., & Suarez, Z. E. (2009). Muslim men and women’s perception of discrimination, hate crimes, and PTSD symptoms post 9/11. Traumatology, 15, 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Addington, L. A., & Rennison, C. M. (2008). Rape co–occurrences: Do additional crimes affect victim reporting and police clearance of rape? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, J. (2002). Policing hatred: Law enforcement, civil rights, and hate crimes. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Black, D. (1971). The social organization of arrest. Stanford Law Review, 23, 1087–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blalock, H. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Boyd, E. A., Berk, R. A., & Hamner, K. M. (1996). “motivated by hatred or prejudice”: Categorization of hate–motivated crimes in two police divisions. Law & Society Review, 30, 819–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Briggs, S., & Opsal, T. (2012). The influence of victim ethnicity on arrest in violent crimes. Criminal Justice Studies, 25, 177–189.Google Scholar
  11. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (September 2014). National Crime Victimization Survey: Technical documentation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  12. Cheng, W., Ickes, W., & Kenworthy, J. B. (2013). The phenomenon of hate crimes in the United States. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 761–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke, P. (2008). When can group level clustering be ignored? Multilevel models versus single-level models with sparse data. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 752–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corcoran, H., Lader, D., & Smith, K. (2015). Hate crime, England and Wales 2014/2015. London, UK: Home Office, Office for National Statistics and Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  15. Cronin, S. W., McDevitt, J., Farrell, A., & Nolan, J. J. (2007). Bias-crime reporting: Organizational responses to ambiguity, uncertainty, and infrequency in eight police departments. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deloughery, K., King, R., & Asal, V. (2012). Close cousins or distant relative? The relationship between terrorism and hate crime. Crime & Delinquency, 58, 663–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Disha, I., Cavendish, J. C., & King, R. D. (2011). Historical events and spaces of hate: Hate crimes against Arabs and Muslims in post-9/11 America. Social Problems, 58, 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2004). Uniform Crime Reporting handbook. Retrieved from http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/handbook/ucrhandbook04.pdf.
  19. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2015). Hate crime statistics, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2014.
  20. Garcia, L., McDevitt, J., Gu, J., & Balboni (2002). Psychological and behavioral effects of bias and non-bias motivated assault. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  21. Garofalo, J. (1997). Hate crime victimization in the United States. In R. C. Davis, A. J. Lurigio, & W. G. Skogan (Eds.), Victims of crime (2nd ed., pp. 134–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hindelang, M. J. (1979). A study of behavior of law. American Sociological Review, 44, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harlow, C. W. (2005). Hate crime reported by victims and police. (NCJ–209911). Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  25. Harrell, F. E. (2016). rms: Regression modeling strategies. R package version 4.4–2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms
  26. Herek, G. M., Gillis, J. R., & Cogan, J. C. (1999). Psychological sequelae of hate-crime victimization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 945–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Iganski, P., & Lagou, S, L. (2015). Hate crimes hurt some more than others: Implications for the just sentencing of offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1696–1718.Google Scholar
  28. Jenness, V., & Grattet, R. (2001). Making hate a crime: From social movement to law enforcement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  29. Kauppinen, A. (2015). Hate and punishment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1719–1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kerstetter, W. A. (1990). Gateway to justice: Police and prosecutorial response to sexual assaults against women. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 267–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King, R. D., & Sutton, G. M. (2013). High times for hate crimes: Explaining the temporal clustering of hate-motivated offending. Criminology, 51, 871–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King, R. D., Messner, S. F., & Baller, R. D. (2009). Contemporary hate crimes, law enforcement, and the legacy of racial violence. American Sociological Review, 74, 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Langton, L., & Planty, M. (2011). Hate crime, 2003–2009. (NCJ-234085). Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  34. Laub, J. (1981). Ecological considerations in victim reporting to the police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 9, 419–430.Google Scholar
  35. Lawrence, F. (2002). Punishing hate: Bias crimes under American law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Leicester Centre for Hate Studies (2014). The Leicester hate crime project. Leicester, UK: University of Leicester.Google Scholar
  37. Levin, B. (1999). Hate crimes: Worse by definition. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 15, 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levin, B., & Amster, S. E. (2007). Make hate history: Hate crime and policing in America’s most diverse city. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 319–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levin, J., & Reichelmann, A. (2015). From thrill to defensive motivation: The role of group threat in the changing nature of hate-motivated assaults. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 1546–1561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lyons, C. J., & Roberts, A. (2014). The difference “hate” makes in clearing crime: An event history analysis of incident factors. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30, 268–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin, S. E. (1995). “A cross–burning is not just an arson”: Police social construction of hate crimes in Baltimore County. Criminology, 33, 303–326.Google Scholar
  42. Martin, S. E. (1996). Investigating hate crimes: Case characteristics and law enforcement responses. Justice Quarterly, 13, 455–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McDevitt, J., Balboni, J., Garcia, L., & Gu, J. (2001). Consequences for victims: A comparison of bias- and non-bias-motivated assaults. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 697–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McNeish, D. M., & Stapleton, L. M. (2014). The effect of small sample size on two-level model estimates: A review and illustration. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Messner, S. F., McHugh, S., & Felson, R. B. (2004). Distinctive characteristics of assaults motivated by bias. Criminology, 42, 585–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ministry of Justice (2013). An overview of hate crime in England and Wales. London, UK: Home Office, Office for National Statistics and Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  47. Nelson, M. S., Wooditch, A., Martin, F. A., Hummer, D., & Gabbidon, S. L. (2015). Hate crimes in post-9/11 Pennsylvania: Case characteristics and police response revisited. Race and Justice. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/2153368715617812.
  48. Perry, B. (2002). Defending the color line: Racially and ethnically motivated hate crime. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Perry, B., & Alvi, S. (2011). ‘We are all vulnerable’: The in terrorem effects of hate crime. International Review of Victimology, 18, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Phillips, N. D. (2009). The prosecution of hate crimes: The limitations of the hate crime typology. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 883–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R–project.org/
  52. Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of processbased policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1005–1028.Google Scholar
  53. Roberts, A. (2009). Contributions of the National Incident–Based Reporting System to substantive knowledge in criminology: A review of research. Sociology Compass, 3, 433–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robitzsch, A., Grund, S., & Henke, T. (2016). Miceadds: Some additional multiple imputation functions, especially for ‘mice’. R package version 1.7–8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=miceadds Google Scholar
  55. Sandholtz, N., Langton, L., & Planty, M. (2013). Hate crime victimization, 2003–2011. (NCJ-241291). Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  56. Skogan, W. G. (1984). Reporting crimes to the police: The status of world research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strom, K. J. (2001). Hate crimes reported in NIBRS, 1997–99. (NCJ-186765). Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  58. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37, 513–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Theall, K. P., Scribner, R., Broyles, S., Yu, Q., Chotalia, J., Simonsen, N., et al. (2011). Impact of small group size on neighbourhood influences in multilevel models. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65, 688–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walker, S., & Katz, C. M. (1995). Less than meets the eye: Police department bias crime units. American Journal of Police, 14, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wexler, C., & Marx, G. T. (1986). When law and order works: Boston’s innovative approach to the problem of racial violence. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilson, M. (2014). Hate crime victimization, 2004–2012. (NCJ–244409). Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  64. Wilson, M. S., & Ruback, R. B. (2003). Hate crimes in Pennsylvania, 1984-99: Case characteristics and police responses. Justice Quarterly, 20, 373–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wisconsin v. Mitchell. (1993). 508 U.S. 476.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott M. Walfield
    • 1
  • Kelly M. Socia
    • 2
  • Ráchael A. Powers
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  2. 2.School of Criminology and Justice StudiesUniversity of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA
  3. 3.Department of CriminologyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations