American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 623–644 | Cite as

Predicting Consistency Between Officially Recorded and Self-Reported Records of Arrest

  • Wendi Pollock
  • Milton C. Hill
  • Scott Menard
  • Delbert S. Elliott
Article

Abstract

National Youth Survey Family Study (NYSFS) respondents were examined to identify the characteristics of individuals and their sociological environments, that would make them more likely to have consistency between self reported and officially recorded records of arrest. Somewhat surprisingly, it was found that those most likely to be at risk of arrest (males, high exposure to delinquent friends, higher level of substance use) are more likely to have consistency between officially recorded and self-reported arrests. Findings will be helpful in both producing more accurate information on arrests and in increasing sensitivity to the possibility of bias in arrest records that may be based on sociodemographic or behavioral characteristics of the individual.

Keywords

Arrest Record consistency Gender Race 

References

  1. Babinski, L. M., Hartsough, C. S., & Lambert, N. M. (2001). A comparison of self-report of criminal involvement and official arrest records. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Piquero, A. R., & Visher, C. A. (2010). Linking the crime and arrest processes to measure variations in the individual arrest risk per crime (Q). Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(4), 533–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosick, S. (2009). Operationalizing crime over the life course. Crime and Delinquency, 55(3), 472–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brame, R., Fagan, J., Piquero, A. R., Schubert, C. A., & Steinberg, L. (2004). Criminal careers of serious delinquents in two cities. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(3), 256–272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, J. P., & Tifft, L. L. (1966). Polygraph and interview validation of self-reported deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 31, 826–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliott. (1995). Lies, damn lies and arrest statistics: The Sutherland award presentation. Boulder: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.Google Scholar
  7. Elliott, D. S., & Ageton, S. S. (1980). Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 45(1), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elliott, D., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (1989). Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emmert, A. D., Carlock, A. L., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D. (2015). Predicting adult under- and over-reporting of self-reported arrests from discrepancies in adolescent self-reports of arrests: A research note. Crime & Delinquency, 1–17. doi: 10.1177/0011128715575141.
  10. Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Van Kammen, W. B., & Schmidt, L. (1996). Self-reported delinquency and a combined delinquency seriousness scale based on boys, mothers, and teachers: concurrent and predictive validity for African-Americans and Caucasians. Criminology, 34(4), 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gold, M. (1966). Undetected delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 3, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Hollingshead, A., & Redlich, F. (1958). Social class and mental illness: A community study. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hser, Y.-I., Anglin, M. D., & Chou, C.-P. (1992). Reliability of retrospective self-report by narcotics addicts. Psychological Assessment, 4(2), 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D. S. (1986). Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2, 293–327.Google Scholar
  16. Junger, M. (1989). Discrepancies between police and self-report data for Dutch racial minorities. British Journal of Criminology, 29(3), 273–284.Google Scholar
  17. Kirk, D. S. (2006). Examining the divergence across self-report and official data sources on inferences about the adolescent life-course of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(2), 107–29.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knight, G. P., Little, M., Losoya, S. H., & Mulvey, E. P. (2004). The self-report of offending among serious juvenile offenders: cross-gender, cross-ethnic/race measurement equivalence. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(3), 273–295.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Krohn, M. D., Thornberry, T. P., Gibson, C. L., & Baldwin, J. M. (2010). The development and impact of self-report measures of crime and delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(4), 509–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., Phillips, M. D., Thornberry, T. P., & Bell, K. A. (2013). Explaining systematic bias in self-reported measures: factors that affect the under- and over-reporting of self-reported arrests. Justice Quarterly, 30(3), 501–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maxfield, M. G., Weiler, B. L., & Widom, C. S. (2000). Comparing self-reports and official records of arrests. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(1), 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGloin, J. M., Pratt, T. C., & Maahs, J. (2004). Rethinking the IQ-delinquency relationship: a longitudinal analysis of multiple theoretical models. Justice Quarterly, 21(3), 603–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Menard, S. (2010). Logistic regression: From introductory to advanced concepts and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Menard, S., & Morse, B. J. (1984). A structuralist critique of the IQ-delinquency hypothesis: theory and evidence. American Journal of Sociology, 89(6), 1347–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Menard, S., Mihalic, S., & Huizinga, D. (2001). Drugs and crime revisited. Justice Quarterly, 18, 269–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Menard, S., Morris, R. G., Gerber, J. G., & Covey, H. C. (2011). Distribution and correlates of self-reported crimes of trust. Deviant Behavior, 32, 872–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morris, R. (1965). Attitudes toward delinquency by delinquents, non-delinquents, and their friends. British Journal of Criminology, 5, 249–265.Google Scholar
  28. Piquero, A. R., Schubert, C. A., & Brame, R. (2014). Comparing official and self-report records of offending across gender and race/ethnicity in a longitudinal study of serious youthful offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(4), 526–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pollock, W., & Menard, S. (2014). “It was a bum RAP”: self-reports of being erroneously arrested in a national sample. Criminal Justice Review, 39(3), 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pollock, W., Oliver, W., & Menard, S. (2014). Measuring the problem: a national examination of disproportionate police contact in the United States. Criminal Justice Review, 37(2), 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pollock, W., Menard, S., Elliott, D., & Huizinga, D. (2015). It’s official: predictors of self-reported vs. officially recorded arrests. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raudenbush, S., Byrk, A., Cheong, Y., Congdon, R., & du Toit. (2004). HLM6: hierarchical linear & nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Rosenbaum, J. E. (2009). Truth or consequences: the intertemporal consistency of adolescent self-report on the Youth Risk Behavior Survey. American Journal of Epidemiology, 169(11), 1388–1397.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Thompson, K. M., Leinfelt, F. H., & Smyth, J. M. (2006). Self-reported official trouble and official arrest: validating a piece of the core alcohol and drug survey. Journal of Substance Abuse, 11(1), 23–36.Google Scholar
  35. Thornberry, T. P., & Farnworth, M. (1982). Social correlates of criminal involvement: further evidence on the relationship between social status and criminal behavior. American Sociology Review, 47(4), 505–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2003). Comparison of self-report and official data for measuring crime. In J. V. Pepper & C. V. Petrie (Eds.), Measurement problems in criminal justice research: workshop summary (pp. 43–94). Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ward, D. A., & Tittle, C. R. (1994). IQ and delinquency: a test of two competing explanations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10(3), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weis, J. G. (1986). Issues in the measurement of criminal careers. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. A. Roth, & C. A. Visher (Eds.), Criminal careers and “Career Criminals,” (Vol. 2, pp. 1–51). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendi Pollock
    • 1
  • Milton C. Hill
    • 2
  • Scott Menard
    • 3
  • Delbert S. Elliott
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesTexas A&M University - Corpus ChristiCorpus ChristiUSA
  2. 2.Department of GovernmentStephen F. Austin State UniversityNacogdochesUSA
  3. 3.College of Criminal JusticeSam Houston State UniversityHuntsvilleUSA
  4. 4.Institute of Behavioral SciencesUniversity of Colorado BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations