Predicting Consistency Between Officially Recorded and Self-Reported Records of Arrest
National Youth Survey Family Study (NYSFS) respondents were examined to identify the characteristics of individuals and their sociological environments, that would make them more likely to have consistency between self reported and officially recorded records of arrest. Somewhat surprisingly, it was found that those most likely to be at risk of arrest (males, high exposure to delinquent friends, higher level of substance use) are more likely to have consistency between officially recorded and self-reported arrests. Findings will be helpful in both producing more accurate information on arrests and in increasing sensitivity to the possibility of bias in arrest records that may be based on sociodemographic or behavioral characteristics of the individual.
KeywordsArrest Record consistency Gender Race
- Elliott. (1995). Lies, damn lies and arrest statistics: The Sutherland award presentation. Boulder: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.Google Scholar
- Emmert, A. D., Carlock, A. L., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D. (2015). Predicting adult under- and over-reporting of self-reported arrests from discrepancies in adolescent self-reports of arrests: A research note. Crime & Delinquency, 1–17. doi: 10.1177/0011128715575141.
- Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Van Kammen, W. B., & Schmidt, L. (1996). Self-reported delinquency and a combined delinquency seriousness scale based on boys, mothers, and teachers: concurrent and predictive validity for African-Americans and Caucasians. Criminology, 34(4), 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D. S. (1986). Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2, 293–327.Google Scholar
- Junger, M. (1989). Discrepancies between police and self-report data for Dutch racial minorities. British Journal of Criminology, 29(3), 273–284.Google Scholar
- Morris, R. (1965). Attitudes toward delinquency by delinquents, non-delinquents, and their friends. British Journal of Criminology, 5, 249–265.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S., Byrk, A., Cheong, Y., Congdon, R., & du Toit. (2004). HLM6: hierarchical linear & nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
- Thompson, K. M., Leinfelt, F. H., & Smyth, J. M. (2006). Self-reported official trouble and official arrest: validating a piece of the core alcohol and drug survey. Journal of Substance Abuse, 11(1), 23–36.Google Scholar
- Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2003). Comparison of self-report and official data for measuring crime. In J. V. Pepper & C. V. Petrie (Eds.), Measurement problems in criminal justice research: workshop summary (pp. 43–94). Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Weis, J. G. (1986). Issues in the measurement of criminal careers. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. A. Roth, & C. A. Visher (Eds.), Criminal careers and “Career Criminals,” (Vol. 2, pp. 1–51). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar