American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 436–449 | Cite as

Self-Control and Racial Disparities in Delinquency: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Article

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to examine the racial disparities of offending within the context of self-control theory. The study utilized data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79), to examine this effect. All concepts within self-control theory are examined: parental management, low self-control, and delinquency. Results from the study show partial support for Gottfredson and Hirschi’s (1990) self-control theory. The structure of the theory remained stable when controlling for both race, as well as peer pressure. Both theoretical and policy implications are given.

Keywords

Race Self-control theory Structural equation modeling 

References

  1. Agnew, R. (1995). Testing the leading crime theories: an alternative strategy focusing on motivational processes. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 32(4), 363–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, P. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 545–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaver, K. M., Wright, J. P., DeLisi, M., & Vaughn, M. G. (2008). Genetic influences on the stability of low self-control: results from a longitudinal sample of twins. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 478–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brame, R., & Paternoster, R. (2003). Missing data problems in criminological research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(1), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brame, R., & Piquero, A. R. (2003). Selective attrition and the age-crime relationship. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brownfield, D., & Sorenson, A. M. (1993). Self-control and juvenile delinquency: theoretical issues and an empirical assessment of selected elements of a general theory of crime. Deviant Behavior, 14, 243–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burt, C. H., Simons, R. L., & Simons, L. G. (2006). A longitudinal test of the effects of parenting and the stability of self-control: negative evidence for the general theory of crime. Criminology, 44, 353–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapple, C. (2005). Self-control, peer relations and delinquency. Justice Quarterly, 22(1), 89–106.Google Scholar
  9. Chapple, C., & Hope, T. (2003). An analysis of the self-control and criminal versatility of dating and gang violence offenders. Violence and Victims, 18(6), 671–690.Google Scholar
  10. Cohn, E., & Farrington, D. (1999). Changes in the most-cited scholars in twenty criminology and criminal justice journals between 1990 and 1995. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Enders, C. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farrell, A. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: a comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 324–327.Google Scholar
  13. Gibbs, J. J., Giever, D., & Higgins, G. E. (2003). A test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory using structural equation modeling. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibbs, J. J., Giever, D., & Martin, J. S. (1998). Parental management and self-control: an empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 40–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giever, D. M. (1995). An empirical assessment of the core elements of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Indiana University of Pennsylvania). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (pp. 174–174). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304246364?accountid=11652.(304246364).
  16. Gottfredson, M. R. (2006). The empirical status of control theory in criminology. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wight, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Advances in criminological theory, vol. 15: Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 205–230). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  17. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., Jr., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hay, C. (2001). Parenting, self-control, and delinquency: a test of self-control theory. Criminology, 39(3), 707–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hay, C., & Forrest, W. (2008). Self-control and the concept of opportunity: the case for a more systematic union. Criminology, 46, 1039–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higgins, G. E. (2002). General theory of crime and deviance: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Crime and Justice, 25(2), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Higgins, G. E., & Ricketts, M. L. (2005). Motivation or opportunity: which serves as the best mediator in self-control theory? Western Criminology Review, 5(2), 77–96.Google Scholar
  23. Higgins, G. E., Kirchner, E. E., Ricketts, M. L., & Marcum, C. D. (2011). Developing self-control: the role of parental stress. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law, and Society, 24, 183–199.Google Scholar
  24. Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Hirschi, T. (2004). Self-control and crime. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory and applications. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hope, T. L., & Chapple, C. L. (2005). Maternal characteristics, parenting, and adolescent sexual behavior: the role of self-control. Deviant Behavior, 26(1), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hope, T. L., Grasmick, H. G., & Pointon, L. J. (2003). The family in Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: structure, parenting, and self-control. Sociological Focus, 36(4), 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.Google Scholar
  29. Junger, M., & Tremblay, R. (1999). Self control, accidents, and crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Junger, M., West, R., & Timman, R. (2001). Crime and risky behavior in traffic: an example of cross-situational consistency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Methodology in the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. LaGrange, T. C., & Silverman, R. A. (1999). Low self-control and opportunity: testing the general theory of crime as an explanation for gender differences in delinquency. Criminology, 37(1), 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. LeBlanc, M. (1993). Late adolescence deceleration of criminal activity and development of self- and social control. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 2, 51–68.Google Scholar
  34. Longshore, D. (1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity: a prospective test of general theory of crime. Social Problems, 45(1), 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Longshore, D. & Turner, S. (1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 81–98.Google Scholar
  36. Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Stein, J. A. (1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: an examination of construct validity. Criminology, 34, 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meade, A. W., & Bauer, D. J. (2007). Power and precision in confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 611–635.Google Scholar
  38. Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54(4), 557–585.Google Scholar
  39. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(4), 599–620.Google Scholar
  40. Nagin, D., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review, 27, 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nofziger, S. (2008). The cause of low self-control: the influence of maternal self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(2), 191–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perrone, D., Sullivan, C. J., Pratt, T. C., & Margaryan, S. (2004). Parental efficacy, self-control, and delinquency: a test of a general theory of crime on a nationally representative sample of youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 298–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Piquero, A. & Tibbetts, S. G. (1996). Specifying low self-control and situational factors in offender decision-making. Justice Quarterly, 31, 601–631.Google Scholar
  44. Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., Tremblay, R., & Jennings, W. G. (2009). Effects of early family/parent training programs on antisocial behavior and delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5(2), 83–120.Google Scholar
  45. Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2010). On the malleability of self-control: theoretical and policy implications regarding a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 803–834.Google Scholar
  46. Polakowski, M. (1994). Linking self- and social control with deviance: illuminating the structure underlying a general theory of crime and its relation to deviant activity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: a meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pratt, T. C., Turner, M. G., & Piquero, A. (2004). Parental socialization and community context: a longitudinal analysis of the structural sources of low self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tibbetts, S. G., & Gibson, C. L. (2002). Individual propensities and rational decision-making: Recent findings and promising approaches. In A. R. Piquero & S. G. Tibbetts (Eds.), Rational choice and criminal behavior: Recent research and future challenges. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Turner, M. G., & Piquero, A. R. (2002). The stability of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Unnever, J. D., Cullen, F. T., & Pratt, T. C. (2003). Parental management, ADHD, and delinquent involvement: reassessing Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. Justice Quarterly, 20(3), 471–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vazsonyi, A. T., & Crosswhite, J. M. (2004). A test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime in African American adolescents. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(4), 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vazsonyi, A. T., Pickering, L. E., Junger, M., & Hessing, D. (2001). An empirical test of a general theory of crime: a four-nation comparative study of self-control and the prediction of deviance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(2), 91–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Winfree, L. T., & Bernat, F. P. (1998). Social learning, self-control, and substance abuse by eighth grade students: a tale of two cities. Journal of Drug Issues, 28, 539–558.Google Scholar
  55. Wood, P. B., Pfefferbaum, B., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Risk-taking and self-control: social psychological correlates of delinquency. Journal of Crime and Justice, 16, 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wright, J. P., & Beaver, K. M. (2005). Do parents matter in creating self-control in their children? A genetically informed test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory of low self-control. Criminology, 43(4), 1169–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wright, L. W., Jr., & Cullen, J. (2001). Reducing college students’ homophobia, erotophobia, and conservatism levels through a human sexuality course. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy, 26, 328–334.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CriminologyIndiana University of PennsylvaniaIndianaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Justice AdministrationUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations