American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 369–391

Stalking Strain, Concurrent Negative Emotions, and Legitimate Coping Strategies: A Preliminary Test of Gendered Strain Theory

Article

Abstract

Using data from the Supplemental Victimization Survey of the NCVS and relying on theoretical direction provided by Broidy and Agnew’s gendered strain theory, we examine gender differences in the concurrent emotional responses to a type of strain that has not been examined by GST researchers: stalking. In particular, we assess whether males and females experience similar levels of concurrent negative emotions and whether concurrent negative emotions are similarly associated with legitimate coping resources for males and females. We found the co-occurrence of emotions is more typical among females than males and the impact of concurrent emotions on the strain/non-crime relationship appear to affect females more than males. One notable finding that emerged from our results is that the co-occurrence of emotions can have both proscriptive and precipitating effects on legitimate outcomes. The implications of our findings for theorists and researchers are also discussed.

Keywords

Stalking General strain theory Reactions to victimization Supplemental Victimization Survey National Crime Victimization Survey 

References

  1. Agnew, R. (1985). A revised strain theory of delinquency. Social Forces, 64, 151–167.Google Scholar
  2. Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agnew, R. (1999). A general theory of community differences in crime rates. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 125–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agnew, R. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 319–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agnew, R. (2002). Experienced, vicarious, and anticipated strain: An exploratory study on physical victimization and delinquency. Justice Quarterly, 19, 603–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Agnew, R. (2006a). Pressured into Crime: An Overview of General Strain Theory. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  7. Agnew, R. (2006b). General strain theory: Current status and directions for further research. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory (pp. 101–123). New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  8. Agnew, R. (2011). Revitalizing Merton: General strain theory. In F. T. Cullen, C. L. Jonson, A. J. Myer, & F. Adler (Eds.), The Origins of American Criminology (pp. 137–158). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  9. Agnew, R., & Brezina, T. (1997). Relational problems with peers, gender, and delinquency. Youth and Society, 29, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Agnew, R., Brezina, T., Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40, 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Aseltine, R. H., Gore, S., & Gordon, J. (2000). Life stress, anger and anxiety, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 256–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bao, W., Haas, A., & Pi, Y. (2004). Life strain, negative emotions, and delinquency: An empirical test of General Strain Theory in the People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baum, K., Catalano, S., Rand, M., & Rose, K. (2009). Stalking Victimization in the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  14. Bjerregaard, B. (2000). An empirical study of stalking victimization. Violence and Victims, 15, 389–406.Google Scholar
  15. Brezina, T. (1996). Adapting to strain: An examination of delinquent coping responses. Criminology, 34, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Broidy, L. M. (2001). A test of general strain theory. Criminology, 39, 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Broidy, L. M., & Agnew, R. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 275–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Coster, S., & Zito, R. C. (2010). Gender and general strain theory: The gendering of emotional experiences and expressions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26, 224–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dugan, L. (1999). The effect of criminal victimization on a household’s moving decision. Criminology, 37, 903–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher, B. S. (2001). Being pursued and pursuing during the college years: The extent, nature, and impact of stalking on college campuses. In J. A. Davis (Ed.), Stalking Crimes and Victim Protection: Prevention, Intervention, Threat Assessment, and Case Management (pp. 207–238). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2002). Being pursued: Stalking victimization in a national study of college women. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 257–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fremouw, W. J., Westrup, D., & Pennypacker, J. (1997). Stalking on campus: The prevalence and strategies for coping with stalking. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, 666–669.Google Scholar
  23. Ganem, N. M. (2010). The role of negative emotion in general strain theory. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26, 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haugaard, J. L., & Seri, L. G. (2001). Stalking and other forms of intrusive contact in adolescent and young-adult relationships. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 69, 227–238.Google Scholar
  25. Hay, C. (2003). Family strain, gender, and delinquency. Sociological Perspectives, 46, 107–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffman, J. P., & Cerbone, F. G. (1999). Stressful life events and delinquency escalation in early adolescence. Criminology, 37, 343–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoffman, J. P., & Su, S. S. (1997). The conditional effects of stress on delinquency and drug use: A strain theory assessment of sex differences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 46–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jang, S. J. (2007). Gender differences in strain, negative emotions, and coping behaviors: A general strain theory approach. Justice Quarterly, 24, 523–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jang, S. J., & Johnson, B. R. (2003). Strain, negative emotions, and deviant coping among African Americans. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jang, S. J., & Johnson, B. R. (2005). Gender, religiosity, and reactions to strain among African Americans. The Sociological Quarterly, 46, 323–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jennings, W. G., Piquero, N. L., Gover, A. R., & Perez, D. M. (2009). Gender and general strain theory: A replication and exploration of Broidy and Agnew’s gender/strain hypotheses among a sample of southwestern Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Katz, J. (1980). Seductions of Crime. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Kaufman, J. M. (2009). Gendered responses to serious strain: The argument for a general strain theory of deviance. Justice Quarterly, 26, 410–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Logan, T. K., Leukefeld, C., & Walker, B. (2000). Stalking as a variant of intimate violence: Implications from a young adult sample. Violence and Victims, 15, 91–111.Google Scholar
  35. Manasee, M. E., & Ganem, N. M. (2009). Victimization as a cause of delinquency: The role of depression and gender. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mazerolle, P. (1998). Gender, general strain, and delinquency: An empirical examination. Justice Quarterly, 15, 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazerolle, P., & Maahs, J. (2000). General strain theory and delinquency: An alternative examination of conditioning influences. Justice Quarterly, 17, 753–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. R. (1997). Violent responses to strain: An examination of conditioning influences. Violence and Victimization, 12, 323–345.Google Scholar
  39. Mazerolle, P., Piquero, A. R., & Capowich, G. E. (2003). Examining the links between strain, situational and dispositional anger, and crime. Youth and Society, 35, 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCreedy, K., & Dennis, B. (1996). Sex-related offenses and fear of crime on campus. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 12, 69–80.Google Scholar
  41. Moon, B., Morash, M., McCluskey, C. P., & Hwang, H. (2009). A comprehensive test of general strain theory: Key strains, situational- and trait-based negative emotions, conditioning factors, and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 182–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. National Criminal Justice Association. (1993). Project to develop a model anti-stalking code for states. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  43. National Institute of Justice. (1996). Domestic Violence: Stalking, and Antistalking Legislation: An Annual Report to Congress under the Violence against Women Act. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  44. Nobles, M. R., Fox, K. A., Piquero, N., & Piquero, A. R. (2009). Career dimensions of stalking victimization and perpetration. Justice Quarterly, 26, 476–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ostrowsky, M. K., & Messner, S. F. (2005). Explaining crime for a young adult population: An application of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piquero, N. L., & Sealock, M. D. (2000). Generalizing general strain theory: An examination of an offending population. Justice Quarterly, 17, 449–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Piquero, N. L., & Sealock, M. D. (2004). Gender and general strain theory: A preliminary test of Broidy and Agnew’s gender/GST hypotheses. Justice Quarterly, 21, 125–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sharp, S. F., Brewster, D., & Redhawk Love, S. (2005). Disentangling strain, personal attributes, affective response and deviance: A gendered analysis. Deviant Behavior, 26, 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sharp, S. F., Terling-Watt, T. L., Atkins, L. A., Gilliam, J. T., & Sanders, A. (2001). Purging behavior in a sample of college females. Deviant Behavior, 22, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shields, S. A. (2002). From the Heart: Gender and the Social Meaning of Emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sigfusdottir, I., Farkas, G., & Silver, E. (2004). The role of depressed mood and anger in the relationship between family conflict and delinquent behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 509–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simon, R. W., & Nath, L. E. (2004). Gender and emotion in the United States: Do men and women differ in self-reports of feelings and expressive behavior. The American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1131–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steffensmeier, D., & Allan, E. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 459–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stets, J., & Turner, J. H. (2006). Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tjaden, P., & Theonnes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  56. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Arts and SciencesUniversity of South Florida-Sarasota/ManateeSarasotaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations