American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 13–26 | Cite as

The Effect of Conjugal Visitation on Sexual Violence in Prison

  • Stewart J. D’Alessio
  • Jamie Flexon
  • Lisa Stolzenberg
Article

Abstract

Using yearly state-level data drawn from a variety of different sources and a pooled cross-sectional time-series research design, we examine whether conjugal visitation attenuates sexual violence in prison. The determination of whether sexual violence in prison is less apt to transpire in states that allow conjugal visitation is theoretically relevant. Feminist theory argues that conjugal visitation has little if any influence on the occurrence of rape and other sexual offenses in prison, notwithstanding the gender of the offender and victim, because such offenses are crimes of power that are employed by the offender as an instrument to dominate and humiliate the victim. On the other hand, sexual gratification theory postulates that conjugal visitation provides inmates with a means of sexual release. Therefore, conjugal visitation should reduce sexual offending in prison. Results support sexual gratification theory by showing that states permitting conjugal visitation have significantly fewer instances of reported rape and other sexual offenses in their prisons. The policy implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

Conjugal visitation Sexual offending Prison 

References

  1. American Correctional Association (2005). 2005 Directory of adult and juvenile correctional departments, institutions, agencies, and probation and parole authorities. Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Correctional Association (2006). 2006 Directory of adult and juvenile correctional departments, institutions, agencies, and probation and parole authorities. Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Correctional Association (2007). 2007 Directory of adult and juvenile correctional departments, institutions, agencies, and probation and parole Authorities. Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & Sweeney, B. (2006). Sexual assault on campus: a multilevel integrative approach to party rape. Social Problems, 53, 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basile, K. C., Chen, J., Black, M. C., & Saltzman, L. E. (2007). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence victimization among U.S. adults, 2001-2003. Violence and Victims, 22, 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates, T. M. (1989). Rethinking conjugal visitation in light of the “AIDS” crisis. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 15, 121–145.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, A. J., & Harrison, P. M. (2005). Sexual violence reported by correctional authorities, 2004. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, A. J., & Harrison, P. M. (2006). Sexual violence reported by correctional authorities, 2005. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, A. J., & Harrison, P. M. (2007a). Sexual violence reported by correctional authorities, 2006. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, A. J., & Harrison, P. M. (2007b). Sexual victimization in state and federal prisons reported by inmates, 2007. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  11. Bennice, J. A., & Resick, P. A. (2003). Marital rape: history, research, and practice. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 4, 228–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell, R., & Wasco, S. M. (2005). Understanding rape and sexual assault: 20 years of progress and future directions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlson, B. E., & Cervera, N. (1991). Inmates and their families: conjugal visits, family, contact, and family functioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 318–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll, L. (1974). Hacks, blacks, and cons: race relations in a maximum-security prison. Prospect Heights: Waveland.Google Scholar
  17. Chapleau, K. M., Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chiroro, P., Bohner, G., Viki, G. T., & Jarvis, C. I. (2004). Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity: expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Christopher, F. S., Madura, M., & Weaver, L. (1998). Premarital sexual aggressors: a multivariate analysis of social, relational, and individual variables. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Conroy, M. A. (2006). Risk management of sex offenders: a model for community intervention. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 34, 5–23.Google Scholar
  21. D’Alessio, S. J., & Stolzenberg, L. (2010). The sex ratio and male-on-female intimate partner violence. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 555–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Department of Justice. (2010). Criminal victimization in the United States. Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Office of Justice Programs. NCJ 227669. Retrieved January 20, 2011 from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=1743
  23. Draucker, C., & Martsolf, D. (2010). Life-course typology of adults who experience sexual violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1155–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dumond, R. W. (2003). Confronting America’s most ignored crime problem: the prison rape elimination act of 2003. The Journal of the Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31, 354–360.Google Scholar
  25. Ellis, L. (1989). Theories of rape: inquiries into the causes of sexual aggression. New York, NY: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  26. Fessler, D. M. T. (2003). Rape is not less frequent during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. Sexualities, Evolution & Gender, 5, 127–147.Google Scholar
  27. Gaffney, J. (1997). Amending the violence against women act: creating a rebuttable presumption of gender animus in rape cases. Journal of Law and Policy, 6, 247–289.Google Scholar
  28. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Golding, J. M., Stein, J. A., Siegel, J. M., Burnam, M. A., & Sorenson, S. B. (1988). Sexual assault history and use of mental health services. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 625–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greene, W. H. (2007). LIMDEP, Version 9.0. New York: Econometric Software, Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Greenfield, D. (2006). Organic approaches to the treatment of paraphilics and sex offenders. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 34, 437–454.Google Scholar
  32. Groth, A. N. (1979). Men who rape: the psychology of the offender. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  33. Grubin, D. (2008). Medical models and interventions in sexual deviance. In R. Laws & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Sexual deviance: theory, assessment, and treatment (2nd ed., pp. 594–610). New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  34. Harrison, K., & Rainey, B. (2009). Suppressing human rights? A rights-based approach to the use of pharmacotherapy with sex offenders. Legal Studies, 29, 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hensley, C., Koscheski, M., & Tewksbury, R. (2002). Does participation in conjugal visitations reduce prison violence in Mississippi? An exploratory study. Criminal Justice Review, 27, 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hensley, C., Koscheski, M., & Tewksbury, R. (2005). Examining the characteristics of male sexual assault targets in southern maximum-security prison. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 667–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hensley, C., Rutland, S., & Gray-Ray, P. (2000). Inmates attitudes toward the conjugal visitation program in Mississippi prisons: an exploratory study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hensley, C., Tewksbury, R., & Castle, T. (2003). Characteristics of prison sexual assault targets in male Oklahoma correctional facilities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hensley, C., Tewksbury, R., & Chiang, C. (2002). Wardens’ attitudes toward conjugal visitation programs. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 9, 307–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hensley, C., Tewksbury, R., & Wright, J. (2001). Exploring the dynamics of masturbation and consensual same-sex activity within a male maximum security prison. Journal of Men’s Studies, 10, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hillman, E. L. (2009). Front and center: sexual violence in U.S. Military Law. Politics & Society, 37, 101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hockett, J. M., Saucier, D. A., Hoffman, B. H., Smith, S. J., & Craig, A. W. (2009). Oppression though acceptance?: Predicting rape myth acceptance and attitudes toward rape victims. Violence Against Women, 15, 877–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hoffmann, H. C., Dickinson, G. E., & Dunn, C. L. (2007). Communication policy changes in state adult correctional facilities from 1971 to 2005. Criminal Justice Review, 32, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Holmstrom, L. L., & Burgess, A. W. (1980). Sexual behavior of assailants during reported rapes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9, 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Howser, J., Grossman, J., & MacDonald, D. (1983). Impact of family reunion program on institutional discipline. Journal of Offender Counseling Services Rehabilitation, 8, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Human Rights Watch. (2001). No escape: male rape in U.S. prisons. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
  47. Lees, S. (1997). Ruling passions: sexual violence, reputation and the law. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Littleton, H., Breitkopf, C. R., & Berenson, A. (2008). Beyond the campus: unacknowledged rape among low-income women. Violence Against Women, 14, 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Locke, B. D., & Mahalik, J. R. (2005). Examining masculinity norms, problem drinking, and athletic involvement as predictors of sexual aggression in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maletzky, B. M., Tolan, A., & McFarland, B. (2006). The Oregon depo-provera program: a five-year follow-up. Sexual Abuse, 18, 303–316.Google Scholar
  51. Man, C. D., & Cronan, J. P. (2001). Forecasting sexual abuse in prison: the prison subculture of masculinity as a backdrop for “deliberate indifference. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 92, 127–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Martin, K., Vieraitis, L. M., & Britto, S. (2006). Gender equality and women’s absolute status: a test of the feminist models of rape. Violence Against Women, 12, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marx, B. P. (2005). Lessons learned from the last twenty years of sexual violence research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Medea, A., & Thompson, K. (1974). Against rape. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
  55. Miller, K. L. (2010). The darkest figure of crime: perceptions of reasons for male inmates to not report sexual assault. Justice Quarterly, 27, 692–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miller, G., Tybur, J. M., & Jordan, B. D. (2007). Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: economic evidence for human estrus? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 375–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Olivero, J. M., Clark, A., Morgado, A. I., & Mounce, G. (1992). A comparative view of aids in prisons: Mexico and the United States. International Criminal Justice Review, 2, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Paras, M. P., Murad, M. H., Chen, L. P., Goranson, E. N., Sattler, A. L., Colbenson, K. M., et al. (2009). Sexual abuse and lifetime diagnosis of somatic disorders. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302, 550–561.Google Scholar
  59. Phillips, J. A., & Greenberg, D. F. (2008). A comparison of methods for analyzing criminological panel data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reiss, A. J., Jr. (1988). Co-offending and criminal careers. Crime and Justice, 10, 117–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sanday, P. R. (1981). The socio-cultural context of rape: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Senechal de la Roche, R. (2001). Why is collective violence collective? Sociological Theory, 19, 126–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Struckman-Johnson, C., Struckman-Johnson, D., Rucker, L., Bumby, K., & Donaldson, S. (1996). Sexual coercion reported by men and women in prison. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Suarez, E., & Gadalla, T. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: a meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2010–2035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2000). A natural history of rape: biological bases of sexual coercion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  66. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2006). Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington: National Institute of Justice. NCJ 210346. Retrieved January 15, 2011 from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/210346.pdf
  67. Wyatt, R. (2006). Male rape in U.S. prisons: are conjugal visits the answer? Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 37, 579–614.Google Scholar
  68. Zurbriggen, E. L., & Yost, M. R. (2004). Power, desire, and pleasure in sexual fantasies. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 288–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stewart J. D’Alessio
    • 1
  • Jamie Flexon
    • 2
  • Lisa Stolzenberg
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminal JusticeFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Department of Criminal JusticeFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations