Advertisement

To Internet or Not?: Assessing the Efficacy of Online Police Training

  • Brian W. Donavant
Article

Abstract

The field of police training is undergoing a paradigm shift due to technology, and this study used an andragogical lens to explore various considerations for the implementation of online education (OE) into police training regimens. This comprehensive assessment utilized quantitative and qualitative methods to examine the feasibility of OE for professional development among police officers in Tennessee. The study examined whether the potential performance of police officers in OE is related to various demographic factors and evaluated the perceptions of police regarding online education. Data analyses indicated a statistically significant relationship between potential online learning success and various factors, including formal educational level and previous exposure to OE. The majority of participants in the study said they preferred OE to traditional instruction, felt that OE is an appropriate delivery method for professional development, and believed that the use of OE for delivery of professional development provides increased training opportunities.

Keywords

Police training Online education 

References

  1. Birzer, M. L. (2004). Andragogy: student centered classrooms in criminal justice programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 15, 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonk, C. J. (2002). Online training in an online world. Retrieved October 27, 2005, from http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/MAR02Jssue/article02.html.
  3. Brockett, R. G. (1992). Do we really need mandatory continuing education? In M. W. Galbraith, & B. R. Sisco (Eds.), New directions for adult and continuing education, 54 (pp. 87–93). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Bruns, D. (2005). Patrol officers’ opinions on the importance of a college degree. Law and Order, 53(9), 96–99.Google Scholar
  5. Donavant, B. W. (2007). Efficacy of distance learning for professional development of police officers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg.Google Scholar
  6. Drucker, P. F. (1997). Looking ahead: implications of the present. Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 18–32.Google Scholar
  7. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2007). Retrieved October 23, 2008, from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2007/data/table_74.html.
  8. Kerr, M., Rynearson. K., & Kerr, M. (2003, January 21–24). Predicting student success in online courses: A new measure. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual International Distance Education Conference. Retrieved July 16, 2004, from http://www.cdlr.tamu.edu/dec_2003/decProceedings/Contents.pdf.
  9. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Chicago: AP/Follett.Google Scholar
  10. Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Knowles, M. S. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species (4th ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf.Google Scholar
  12. Mager, R. F. (1997). Preparing instructional objectives (3rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: CEP Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mattran, K. J. (1981). Mandatory education increases professional competence. In B. W. Kreitlow (Ed.), Examining controversies in adult education (pp. 45–51). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Nadler, L., & Nadler, Z. (1994). Designing training programs: The critical events model. Houston, TX: Gulf.Google Scholar
  15. Napier, M. (2005). The need for higher education. Law and Order, 51(9), 86–92.Google Scholar
  16. Pope, K. M. (2003). An assessment of law enforcement agency satisfaction with the Police Corps program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg.Google Scholar
  17. Rachal, J. R. (2002). Andragogy’s detectives: A critique of the present and a proposal for the future. Adult Education Quarterly, 52, 210–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon as reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers: A comparative research annotated bibliography on technology for distance education. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
  19. Schafer, J. A., & Boyd, S. (2007). The future of education and training for police. In J. A. Schafer (Ed.), Policing 2020: Exploring the future of crime, communities, and policing (pp. 372–413). Quantico, VA: U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.Google Scholar
  20. Schanlaub, R. (2005). Degree or no degree. Law and Order, 51(9), 76–80.Google Scholar
  21. Sharp, A. (2003). Training, funding and equipment. Law & Order, 52(10), 178–184.Google Scholar
  22. Weigel, V. (2000, September/October). E-learning and the tradeoff between richness and reach in higher education. Change [on-line], 33. Available: EbscoHost/ Academic Search Elite.Google Scholar
  23. Weiss, J., & Davis, M. (2003). People with abilities: the untapped resource. Law & Order, 51(9), 70–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Criminal JusticeUniversity of Tennessee at MartinMartinUSA

Personalised recommendations