Making Sense out of Nonsense: The Deconstruction of State-Level Sex Offender Residence Restrictions
- 388 Downloads
Releasing a sex offender from prison or placing the offender on community-based sanctions, only to have the offender commit a new sex crime, is a policy-maker’s worst nightmare. Fueled by misperceptions and public fear, sex offender laws have developed piecemeal and without rigorous empirical insight and testing. While policies and practices are well-intended, they are unlikely to resolve the very real social problem of sexual violence and may inadvertently increase victimization. Such is the possibility with residence restrictions. This type of law is among the newest in an ever-growing barrage of legislation designed specifically for sexual criminals yet what little research that exists suggests there is no correlation between residence and sexual recidivism. This article identifies 30 states with state-level residence restrictions and conducts a content analysis of each state’s legislation. Geographical and other assessments are also conducted.
KeywordsProximity restrictions Recidivism Residence restrictions Sex offenders
- Aos, S., Phipps, O., Barnoski, R., & Lieb, R. (2001). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime. Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA. Retrieved June 1, 2006 from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/rptfiles/costbenefit.pdf.
- Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA). (2007). Facts about sex offenders. Retrieved at http://www.atsa.com/ppOffenderFacts.html. Last viewed on November 11, 2007.
- Belknap, J. (2007). The invisible woman: Gender, crime and justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Colorado Department of Public Safety (2004). Report on safety issues raised by living arraignments for and location of sex offenders in the community. Denver, CO: Sex Offender Management Board.Google Scholar
- Davey, M. (2006, March 15). Iowa’s residency rules drive sex offenders underground. New York: Times.Google Scholar
- Duwe, G., Donnay, W., & Tewksbury, R. (2008). Does residential proximity matter? A geographic analysis of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 484–504.Google Scholar
- Durling, C. (2006). Never going home: Does it make us safer? Does it make sense? Sex offenders, residency restrictions, and reforming risk management law. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 97, 317–380.Google Scholar
- Greenfeld, L. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A. J. R., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V. L., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatments for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hanson, R., & Harris, A. (1998). Dynamic predictors of sexual recidivism. Ottawa, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.Google Scholar
- Harris, A. J. R., & Hanson, R. K. (2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple question (No. 2004 –03). Ottawa: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.Google Scholar
- Iowa County Attorneys Association. (2006). Statement on sex offender residency restrictions in Iowa. Des Moines, IA. Retrieved on October 10, 2007 from http://www.iowaicaa.com/ICAA%20STATEMENTS/Sex%20Offender%20Residency%20Statement%20Dec%2011%2006.pdf.
- Karmen, A. (2007). Crime victims: An introduction to victimology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Koss, M. (1988). Hidden rape: Sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education. In A. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and Sexual Assault II (pp. 3–25). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
- Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Langan, P. A., Schmitt, E. L., & DuRose, M. R. (2003). Recidivism of sex offenders released from prison in 1994. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Laub, J., & Sampson, R. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice A Review of Research, Vol. 28 (pp. 1–69). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Levenson, J. (2006). Sex offender residence restrictions. Sex Offender Law Report, 7(33), 46–47.Google Scholar
- Mann vs. Georgia Department of Corrections et al., 282 Ga. 754 (2007). Retrieved March 23 2008 from http://www.gasupreme.us/pdf/s07a1043.pdf.
- Meloy, M. L. (2006). Sex offenses and the men who commit them. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
- Meloy, M. L., Wolff, N., Saleh, Y., & Shi, J. (2006). The criminal desistance and persistence of sex offenders re-entering society: How to encourage law conforming behavior. Unpublished manuscript, presented at Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, March, 2006.Google Scholar
- Miller, S. L. (2005). Victims as offenders: The paradox of women’s violence in relationships. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2003). Level three sex offenders residential placement issues. St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2007). Residential Proximity & Sex Offense Recidivism in Minnesota. St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Russell, D. (1984). Sexual exploitation: Rape, child sexual abuse, and workplace harassment. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Sample, L., & Streveler, A. (2003). Latent consequences of community notification laws. In S. H. Decker, L. F. Alaird, & C. M. Katz (Eds.), Controversies in Criminal Justice (pp. 353–362). Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
- Snyder, H. (2000). Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident, and offender characteristics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. (2006). Where to find sex offenders: An examination of residential locations and neighborhood conditions. Criminal Justice Studies, 19, 61–75.Google Scholar
- Zevitz, R. (2006). Sex offender community notification: Its role in recidivism and offender reintegration. Criminal Justice Studies, 19, 193–208.Google Scholar