Student Success and Failure in a Graduate Criminology/Criminal Justice Program
- 222 Downloads
Despite the burdens that students and institutions assume when underwriting educational careers, very little is known about completion rates, risk factors, and successful strategies of criminology/criminal justice (CCJ) graduate programs. Consequently, the present study tracks 287 master’s and 70 doctoral students who entered the Florida State University CCJ program during the 1991–2000 academic years. Almost two-thirds of this cohort earned an advanced degree. Younger students with higher GRE scores were more likely to complete the master’s program. Successful doctoral degree recipients tended to have lower GRE scores, be non-White, and earn their master’s degrees in-house. In terms of time-to-degree, it took over two years to earn an M.A. and slightly more than six years to negotiate the Ph.D. Implications are explored for the program, the university, and the discipline.
KeywordsAttrition Time-to-degree Graduate education
- Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (2006). The Association of Criminology and Criminal Justice Doctoral Program Directors summit. ACJS Today, 31(3), 18–30.Google Scholar
- Ad Hoc Panel on Graduate Attrition in the Sciences and Humanities (1996). The path to the Ph.D. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- American Economic Association. (2007). Universal academic questionnaire. Retrieved on August 6, 2007, from http://www.vanderbilt.edu/AEA/UAQ/index.htm.
- Association of Doctoral Programs in Criminology and Criminal Justice. (2007). Association of Doctoral Programs in Criminology and Criminal Justice. Retrieved on June 18, 2007, from http://www.adpccj.org.
- Berelson, B. (1960). Graduate education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
- Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the Ph.D. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Breneman, D. W. (1970). An economic theory of Ph.D. production: The case at Berkeley. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Office of the Vice President-Planning and Analysis, Research Program in University Administration.Google Scholar
- Breneman, D. W. (1977). Efficiency in graduate education: An attempted reform (Rev. Ed.). New York: Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
- Council of Graduate Schools (2004). Ph.D. Completion and attrition: Policy, numbers, leadership, and next steps. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.Google Scholar
- DeBrock, L., Hendricks, W., & Koenker, R. (1996). The economics of persistence: Graduation rates of athletes as labor market choice. Journal of Human Resources, 36, 515–539.Google Scholar
- Florida State University (2003). Graduate bulletin. Tallahassee: Office of the University Registrar.Google Scholar
- Gemeroth, D. (1991). Lonely days and lonely nights: Completing the doctoral dissertation. American Communication Association Bulletin, 76, 60–89.Google Scholar
- Gunn, C. S., & Sanford, T. R. (1988). Doctoral student retention. College and University, 63, 374–382.Google Scholar
- Hermanowicz, J. C. (2003). College attrition at American research universities: Comparative case studies. New York: Algora Publishing.Google Scholar
- Holmes, C. B., & Beishline, M. J. (1996). Correct classification, false positives, and false negatives in predicting completion of the Ph.D. from GRE scores. Psychological Reports, 79, 939–945.Google Scholar
- ISU. (2007) ISU NRC Ph.D. program ranking project. Retrieved on August 9, 2007, from http://www.vpreserch.iastate.edu/nrc/taxononmy.html.
- Jacks, P., Chubin, D. E., Porter, A. L., & Connolly, T. (1983). The ABCs of ABDs: A study of incomplete doctorates. Improving College and University Teaching, 31, 74–81.Google Scholar
- Langolis, E. (1972). Graduate attrition at Berkeley. University of California at Berkeley: Office of Institutional Research.Google Scholar
- Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
- Lunneborg, C., & Lunneborg, P. W. (1972). Doctoral study attrition in psychology. Seattle: Washington University.Google Scholar
- Morrison, T., & Morrison, M. (1995). A meta-analytic assessment of the predictive validity of the quantitative and verbal components of the Graduate Record Examination with graduate grade point average representing the criterion of graduate success. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Research Council. (2007). The National Research Council. Retrieved on July 8, 2007, from http://www.nationalacademies.org/nrc.
- Northwest Regional Data Center. (2006). Infrastructure. Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.nwrdc.com/Infrastructure.htm.
- Pogrow, S. (1978). Program characteristics and the use of student data to predict attrition from doctoral programs. College Student Journal, 12, 348–353.Google Scholar
- Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Tucker, A., Gottlieb, D., & Pease, J. (1964). Attrition of graduate students at the Ph.D. level in the traditional arts and sciences. Final report of cooperative research project No. 1146, entitled: Factors related to attrition among doctoral students. Publication No. 8. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Office of Research Development and the Graduate School.Google Scholar
- Vacc, N. N., & Picot, R. (1984). Predicting success in doctoral study. College Student Journal, 18, 113–116.Google Scholar
- Williams, J. D., Harlow, S. D., & Gab, D. (1970). A longitudinal study examining prediction of doctoral success: Grade point average as criterion, or graduation vs. non-graduation as criterion. Journal of Educational Research, 64, 161–164.Google Scholar
- Zwick, R. (1991). An analysis of graduate school careers in three universities: Differences in attainment patterns across academic programs and demographic groups (GRE Board Professional Report No. 86–21P). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar