American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 32, Issue 1–2, pp 12–29 | Cite as

The Joy of Violence: What about Violence is Fun in Middle-School?

Article

Abstract

Violence prevention programs that aim to ameliorate or eliminate school-based violence (student-on-student victimization) often assume that students, like adults, regard school-based violence as aversive, harmful, problematic, and without any redeeming value. Nonetheless, students may experience violence as fun or enjoyable at school, and they may not see a reason to prevent violence if it brings them joy on some level. This study examined qualitative data from 30 face-to-face interviews with students (grades 6–8) in a single middle school. Content analyses clarified the social contexts in which students experience violence as fun, not fun, or a mixture of both. The results suggested that 70% of all sampled students reported enjoyable experiences with school-based violence. Conclusions examined the implications of these findings for prevention programs; future research is needed to correct for the methodological limitations of this study and others.

Keywords

Schools Violence Victimization Bullying Perceptions Qualitative research 

References

  1. Ableser, J. (2003). Elementary teachers’ attitudes, perceptions and practices towards the implementation of a violence prevention curriculum: Second Step. Journal of School Violence, 2(4), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aries, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  3. Astor, R. A., Meyer, H. A., Benbenishty, R., Marachi, R., & Rosemond, M. (2005). School safety interventions: Best practices and programs. Children & Schools, 27(1), 17–32.Google Scholar
  4. Berg, B. L. (1995). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2001). Toward a process view of peer rejection and harassment. In J. Juvonen, & S. Graham (Eds.), School-based peer harassment: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 265–289). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21(1), 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Denmark, F., Krasss, H. H., Wesner, R. W., Midlarksy, E., & Gielen, U. P. (Eds.). (2005). Violence in schools: Cross-national and cross-cultural perspectives. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. DeVoe, J. F., Peter, K., Noonan, M., Snyder, T. D., & Baum, K. (2005). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2005 (NCES 2006-001/NCJ 210697). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  9. Farrell, A. D., Sullivan, T. N., Kliewer, W., Allison, K. W., Erwin, E. H., Meyer, A. L., et al. (2006). Peer and school problems in the lives of urban adolescents: Frequency, difficulty, and relation to adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farrington, D. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 17, 381–458.Google Scholar
  11. Firestone, W. A. (1987). Meaning in method: The rhetoric of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 16(7), 16–21.Google Scholar
  12. Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., & Guzzo, B. A. (2000). Second Step: Preventing aggression by promoting social competence. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8(2), 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Edstrom, L. V. S., MacKenzie, E. P., & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: An experimental trial of the Steps to Respect Program. Developmental Psychology, 41(3), 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldstein, J. H. (1998). Why we watch: The attractions of violent entertainment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Greenberg, M. T. (2004). Current and Future Challenges in School-Based Prevention: The Researcher Perspective. Prevention Science, 5(1), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris, S., & Petrie, G. F. (2003). Bullying: The bullies, the victims, and the bystanders. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Arthur, M. W. (2002). Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 951–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10(4), 512–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview: Qualitative research methods series 37. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Houndoumadi, A., & Pateraki, L. (2001). Bullying and bullies in Greek elementary schools: Pupils’ attitudes and teachers’/parents’ awareness. Educational Review, 53, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2000). Peer harassment, psychosocial adjustment, and school functioning in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanetsuna, T., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Pupil insights into bullying, and coping with bullying: A bi-national study in Japan and England. Journal of School Violence, 1(3), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krahe, B. (2001). The social psychology of aggression. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, Ltd.Google Scholar
  24. Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (Eds.). (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  25. Land, D. (2003). Teasing apart secondary students’ conceptualizations of peer teasing, bullying and sexual harassment. School Psychology International, 24(2), 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lodge, J., & Frydenberg, E. (2005). The role of peer bystanders in school bullying: Positive steps toward promoting peaceful schools. Theory Into Practice, 44(4), 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luborsky, M. R., & Rubinstein, R. L. (1995). Sampling in qualitative research: Rationale, issues, and methods. Research on Aging, 17(1), 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ma, X., Stewin, L. L., & Mah, D. L. (2001). Bullying in school: Nature, effects, and remedies. Research Papers in Education, 16(3), 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Macklem, G. L. (2003). Bullying and teasing: Social power in the children’s groups. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Mayer, G. R., & Sulzer-Azeroff, B. (1991). Interventions for vandalism. In G. Stoner, M. K. Shinn, & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavioral problems (pp. 559–580). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Psychologists.Google Scholar
  31. McMahon, S. D. (2003). Violence prevention: An evaluation of program effects with Urban African American students. Journal of Primary Prevention, 24(1), 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer, A. L., & Farrell, A. D. (1998). Social skills training to promote resilience in urban sixth-grade students: One product of an action research strategy to prevent youth violence in high-risk environments. Education and Treatment of Children, 21(4), 461–479.Google Scholar
  33. Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.220–235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Naito, T., & Gielen, U. P. (2005). Bullying and Ijime in Japanese schools. In F. L. Denmark, H. H. Krauss, R. W. Wesner, E. Midlarsky, & Gielen, U. P. (Eds.), Violence in Schools: Cross-National and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 169–190). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. 7101–7103 (2002).Google Scholar
  36. O’Connell, P., Pepler, D. J., & Craige, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oliver, R., Hoover, J. H., & Hazler, R. (1994). The perceived roles of bullying in small-town Midwestern schools. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72, 416–420.Google Scholar
  38. Olson, J.R., Goddard, H.W., Solheim, C.A., Sandt, L. (2004). Making a Case for Engaging Adolescents in Program Decision-Making. Journal of Extension, 42(6), http://www.joe.org/joe/2004december/rb4.shtml.
  39. Olweus, D. (1992). Bullying among schoolchildren: Intervention and prevention. In R. D. Peters, R. J. McMahon, & V. L. Quinsey (Eds.), Aggression and violence throughout the life span (pp. 100–125). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Ortega, R., & Lera, M-J. (2000). The Seville Anti-Bullying in School Project. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Owens, L., Shute, R., & Slee, P. (2000a). “I am in and you are out...” Explanations for teenage girls’ indirect aggression. Psychology, Evolution, and Gender, 2(1), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Owens, L., Shute, R., & Slee, P. (2000b). “It hurts a hell of a lot...” The effects on indirect aggression on teenage girls. School Psychology International, 21(4), 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Owens, L., Shute, R., & Slee, P. (2000c). “Guess what I heard!” Indirect aggression among teenage girls in Australia. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  45. Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26(3), 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rigby, K., & Slee, P. (1999). Australia. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Salmivalli, C. (2001). Peer-led intervention campaign against school bullying: Who considered it useful, who benefited? Educational Research, 43(3), 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Salmivalli, C., Kaukianen, A., & Voeten, M. (2005). Anti-bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 465–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukianen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, P. K., Pepler, D., & Rigby, K. (Eds.). (2004). Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be? New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, P. K., & Shu, S. (2000). What good schools can do about bullying: Findings from a survey in English schools after a decade of research and action. Childhood, 7, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith, J., Twemlow, S. W., & Hoover, D. W. (1999). Bullies, victims, and bystanders: A method of in-school intervention and possible parental contributions. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 30(1), 29–37.Google Scholar
  54. Smokowski, P. R., & Kopasz, K. H. (2005). Bullying in school: An overview of types, effects, family characteristics, and interventions. Children & Schools, 27(2), 101–110.Google Scholar
  55. Sprague, J., Walker, H., Golly, A., White, K., Myers, D. R., & Shannon, T. (2001). Translating research into effective practice: The effects of a universal staff and student intervention on indicators of discipline and school safety. Education and Treatment of Children, 24(4), 495–511.Google Scholar
  56. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Sutton, J., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: Adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taub, J. (2001). Evaluation of the Second Step Violence Prevention Program at a rural elementary school. School Psychology Review, 31(2), 186–200.Google Scholar
  59. Terasahjo, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2003). “She is not actually bullied.” The discourse of harassment in student groups. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 134–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tulloch, M. (1998). Australian schoolchildren’s perceptions of television representations of bullying and victimization. In P. Slee & K. Rigby (Eds), Children’s Peer Relations (pp. 215–226). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Twemlow, S. W., Fonagy, P., Sacco, F. C., Gies, M. L., & Hess, D. (2001). Improving the social and intellectual climate in elementary schools by addressing bully-victim-bystander power struggles. In J. Cohen (Ed.), Caring Classrooms/ Intelligent Schools: The social emotional education of young children (pps. 162–179).Google Scholar
  62. Twemlow, S. W., & Sacco, F. C. (1996). A clinical and interactionist perspective on the bully-victim-bystander relationship. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 60(3), 296–314.Google Scholar
  63. Vazsonyi, A. T., Belliston, L. M., & Flannery, D. J. (2004). Evaluation of a school-based, universal violence prevention program: Low-, medium-, and high-risk children. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(2), 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3–25.Google Scholar
  65. Whitted, K. S., & Dupper, D. R. (2005). Best practices for preventing or reducing bullying in schools. Children & Schools, 27(3), 167–175.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal Justice, College of Human EcologyEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  2. 2.George Warren Brown School of Social WorkWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations