Advertisement

The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 86, Issue 12, pp 1139–1141 | Cite as

Longitudinal Growth of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants at 5 years

  • Jogender Kumar
  • Kanya MukhopadhyayEmail author
Clinical Brief
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

This prospective cohort study assessed longitudinal growth of Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants at 5 y of age. ELBW infants discharged alive during 2009–2011 were prospectively followed till 5 y of age. Forty-five matched controls were enrolled. The weight, length, and occipitofrontal circumference were recorded and Z-scores were calculated using the WHO software. The primary outcome was the comparison of growth parameters of the ELBW cohort with controls. Forty-seven ELBW and 45 controls were assessed at 5 y. In ELBW cohort, 17 (36.2%) were underweight, 13 (27.7%) were stunted, 11 (23.4%) were wasted, and 6 (15.7%) had microcephaly at 5 y. As compared to controls, the proportion of underweight and stunting was significantly higher among ELBW infants (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in Z-scores at 2 and 5 y. ELBW infants have significant undernutrition at 5 y of age and there is no catch-up growth beyond 2 y.

Keywords

Extremely low birth weight Growth Catch up Nutrition 

Notes

Authors' Contribution

JK: Conceptualized and designed the study, collected, and analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. KM: Conceptualized and designed the study, supervised data collection and analysis and critically revised the manuscript. Both the authors approved the final version of the manuscript and will be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Lin H-J, Du L-Z, Ma X-L, et al. Mortality and morbidity of extremely low birth weight infants in the mainland of China: a multi-center study. Chin Med J. 2015;128:2743–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. Nutritional needs of low-birth-weight infants. Pediatrics. 1985;75:976–86.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mukhopadhyay K, Louis D, Mahajan G, Mahajan R. Longitudinal growth and post-discharge mortality and morbidity among extremely low birth weight neonates. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:723–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mukhopadhyay K, Louis D, Murki S, Mahajan R, Dogra MR, Kumar P. Survival and morbidity among two cohorts of extremely low birth weight neonates from a tertiary hospital in northern India. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50:1047–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    The WHO Child Growth Standards. Available at: https://www.who.int/childgrowth/en/. Accessed 1st March 2019.
  6. 6.
    NLIS Country Profile Indicators Interpretation Guide. World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/nutrition/nlis_interpretationguide_isbn9789241599955/en/. Accessed 1st March 2019.
  7. 7.
    Desmond C, Casale D. Catch-up growth in stunted children: definitions and predictors. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0189135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang PW, Fang LJ, Tsou KI. The growth of very-low-birth-weight infants at 5 years old in Taiwan. Pediatr Neonatol. 2014;55:114–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bracewell MA, Hennessy EM, Wolke D, Marlow N. The EPICure study: growth and blood pressure at 6 years of age following extremely preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;93:F108–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hack M, Schluchter M, Cartar L, Rahman M, Cuttler L, Borawski E. Growth of very low birth weight infants to age 20 years. Pediatrics. 2003;112:e30–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Neonatology, Department of PediatricsPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations