The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 86, Issue 4, pp 382–385 | Cite as

Liquid Drug Dosage Measurement Errors with Different Dosing Devices

  • Pradnya Joshi
  • Sandeep B. BavdekarEmail author
Clinical Brief


An observational study was carried out to determine the magnitude of dosing errors made by parents, the most-preferred drug delivery device and the association of age, gender, education of the caregiver and number of children with the proportion of accurate doses. After enrolment, parents of children aged 6–60 mo were instructed to measure 5 ml of syrup paracetamol using any of the devices (stainless steel spoon, disposable plastic syringe, dosing cup with etched markings) displayed. The quantum of measured dose was confirmed using a calibrated glass cylinder. Error was defined as over 10% variation around the prescribed dose. Of 386 participants, 72 (18.65%) committed error, with 58 (15.02%) and 14 (3.62%) committing mild and moderate errors, respectively. Measuring cup (270, 69.95%) was the commonest device chosen. Use of syringe was associated with greater accurate measurements (P < 0.05) with only 3 (3.57%) committing error compared to 18 (56.25%) and 51 (18.88%) committing error with spoon and cup, respectively. On multivariate analysis, device was the only factor significantly associated with accuracy in measurements.


Administration Oral Parents Medication errors Patient safety 


Authors’ Contributions

PJ: Literature search, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, writing the initial draft, finalization of the manuscript draft and approval of the final manuscript draft; SBB: Conceptualization of the study, literature search, data analysis, significant intellectual inputs for improvement of the draft manuscript, approval of the final version of the manuscript and will publicly defend the article.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest


Source of Funding



  1. 1.
    Yin HS, Mendelsohn AL, Wolf MS, et al. Parents' medication administration errors: role of dosing instruments and health literacy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164:181–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yin HS, Dreyer BP, van Schaick L, Foltin GL, Dinglas C, Mendelsohn AL. Randomized controlled trial of a pictogram-based intervention to reduce liquid medication dosing errors and improve adherence among caregivers of young children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162:814–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams LV, Craig SR, Mmbaga EJ, et al. Children’s Medicines in Tanzania: A National Survey of Administration Practices and Preferences. Available at: Accessed 17 Feb 2015.
  4. 4.
    Ryu GS, Lee YJ. Analysis of liquid medication dose errors made by parents and caregivers using alternative measuring devices. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012;18:439–45.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McMahon SR, Rimsza ME, Bay RC. Parents can dose liquid medication accurately. Pediatrics. 1997;100:330–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    US Pharmacopoeia. <1221> Teaspoon. Available at: Accessed 20 Feb 2015.
  7. 7.
    nMaster sample size software. Available at: 20 Feb 2015.
  8. 8.
    Sobhani P, Christopherson J, Ambrose PJ, Corelli RL. Accuracy of oral liquid measuring devices: comparison of dosing cup and oral dosing syringe. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42:46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Madlon-Kay DJ, Mosch FS. Liquid medication dosing. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:741–4.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paul IM, Metric units and the preferred dosing of orally administered liquid medications; AAP Policy Statement; April 2015. Available at: Accessed 11 Dec 2016.
  11. 11.
    Ravikiran SR, Shivarajashankara YM. Dosing ability of Indian parents for liquid medication. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:153–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simon HK, Weinkle DA. Over the counter medications. Do parents give what they intend to give? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:654–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beckett VL, Tyson LD, Carroll D, Gooding NM, Kelsall AW. Accurately administering oral medication to children isn’t child’s play. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97:838–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones DV, Work CE. Volume of a swallow. Am J Dis Child. 1961;102:427.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PediatricsTN Medical College and BYL Nair Charitable HospitalMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations