Advertisement

The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 84, Issue 4, pp 257–261 | Cite as

Effect of Surfactant Therapy Using Orogastric Tube for Tracheal Catheterization in Preterm Newborns with Respiratory Distress

  • Rampal Singh Tomar
  • Ranjit Ghuliani
  • Dinesh Yadav
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

To assess the outcome of a modified method of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy (MIST) therapy where an orogastric tube was used for tracheal catherization to deliver surfactant in preterm newborns less than 34 wk of gestation with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

Methods

A single centre, prospective observational study was conducted to enroll eligible inborn preterm neonates with gestation age more than 24 wk but less than 34 wk and suffering from RDS to receive surfactant using MIST. Results were compared with a historical cohort of preterms who received surfactant with InSurE (Intubate, Surfactant, Extubate) technique.

Results

Sixty four cases in the modified MIST group were compared with a historic cohort of 68 cases in the InSurE group. There were no differences in the requirement of intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV) in the first 72 h but the duration of MV and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were significantly less in modified MIST group. Other neonatal morbidities and mortality rates were similar in either of the groups.

Conclusions

The modified MIST technique is an effective method for the treatment of RDS in preterms with better clinical efficacy and comparable outcomes than the more invasive InSurE procedure and deserves further evaluation.

Keywords

InSurE Surfactant Preterm Minimal invasive surfactant therapy Respiratory distress 

Notes

Contributions

RPST: Coordinated patient management and drafted the initial report; RG & DY: Supervised management and critically reviewed the manuscript. All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript. RG will act as guarantor for the paper.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Fanaroff A, Stoll B, Wright L, et al. Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:147.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Public Health Foundation of India. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Save the Children. In: Zodpey S, Paul VK, editors. State of India’s Newborns (SOIN) 2014- A Report. New Delhi: PHFI, AIIMS, SC; 2014.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stoll B, Hansen N, Bell E, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD neonatal research network. Pediatrics. 2010;126:443–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verder H, Robertson B, Greisen G, et al. Surfactant therapy and nasal continuous positive airway pressure for newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. Danish-Swedish multicentre study group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1051–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Björklund L, Ingimarsson J, Curstedt T, et al. Manual ventilation with a few large breaths at birth compromises the therapeutic effect of subsequent surfactant replacement in immature lambs. Pediatr Res. 1997;42:348–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kribs A, Pillekamp F, Hünseler C, Vierzig A, Roth B. Early administration of surfactant in spontaneous breathing with nCPAP: feasibility and outcome in extremely premature infants (postmenstrual age d 27 weeks). Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17:364–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silverman WC, Anderson DH. Controlled clinical trial on effects of water mist on obstructive respiratory signs, death rate and necropsy findings among premature infants. Pediatrics. 1956;17:1–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kliegman RM, Walsh MC. Necrotizing enterocolitis: pathogenesis, classification and spectrum of illness. Curr Probl Pediatr. 1987;17:213–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity Revisited. The International Committee for the classification of retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:991–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978;92:529–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bancalari E, Jobe AH. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1723–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Göpel W, Kribs A, Ziegler A, et al; German Neonatal Network. Avoidance of mechanical ventilation by surfactant treatment of spontaneously breathing preterm infants (AMV): an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378:1627–34.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kribs A, Härtel C, Kattner E, et al. Surfactant without intubation in preterm infants with respiratory distress: first multi-center data. Klin Padiatr. 2010;222:13–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kanmaz HG, Erdeve O, Canpolat FE, Mutlu B, Dilmen U. Surfactant administration via thin catheter during spontaneous breathing: randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e502–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aguar M, Cernada M, Brugada M, Gimeno A, Gutierrez A, Vento M. Minimally invasive surfactant therapy with a gastric tube is as effective as the intubation, surfactant, and extubation technique in preterm babies. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:e229–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yost CC, Soll RF. Early versus delayed selective surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD001456.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network; Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC, et al. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1970–9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dunn MS, Kaempf J, de Klerk A, et al; Vermont Oxford Network DRM Study Group. Randomized trial comparing 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e1069–76.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sandri F, Plavka R, Ancora G, et al; CURPAP Study Group. Prophylactic or early selective surfactant combined with nCPAP in very preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e1402–9.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petrikovsky BM, Lysikiewicz A, Markin LB, Slomko Z. In utero surfactant administration to preterm human fetuses using endoscopy. Fetal Diagnosis Therapy. 1995;10:127–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Berggren E, Liljedahl M, Winbladh B, et al. Pilot study of nebulized surfactant therapy for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89:460–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kattwinkel J, Robinson M, Bloom BT, Delmore P, Ferguson JE. Technique for intrapartum administration of surfactant without requirement for an endotracheal tube. J Perinatol. 2004;24:360–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Attridge JT, Stewart C, Stukenborg GJ, Kattwinkel J. Administration of rescue surfactant by laryngeal mask airway: lessons from a pilot trial. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30:201–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dargaville PA, Aiyappan A, Cornelius A, Williams C, De Paoli AG. Preliminary evaluation of a new technique of minimally invasive surfactant therapy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96:F243–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rampal Singh Tomar
    • 1
  • Ranjit Ghuliani
    • 1
  • Dinesh Yadav
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PediatricsBase HospitalDelhi CanttIndia

Personalised recommendations