The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 82, Issue 1, pp 25–28 | Cite as

Publication Rate of Scientific Papers Presented at the XXVI Annual Convention of National Neonatology Forum (NEOCON 2006)

Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

To document the publication rate of papers presented at the Annual Convention of National Neonatology Forum of India (NNF), and study the factors associated with their subsequent publication.

Methods

All papers presented at the NEOCON 2006, the XXVI annual convention of NNF at Varanasi, India, were searched for subsequent full publication, by an internet-based search using Pubmed, Google Scholar and Indmed. Publication of the presented paper was looked for in English language, peer-reviewed, indexed journals over the next five years (1st January 2007 to 31st December, 2011). The full published papers were compared with the abstract and differences noted.

Results

One hundred and two papers and posters were presented at the conference and 14 (13.7 %) of these were published in the next five years. None was published in any un-indexed journal. The highest percentage of paper publication was from the Award paper category (83.3 %) and least from Innovation category (none). The only factor significantly associated with subsequent publication was presentation as an Award paper (P < 0.001). On comparison of the presented abstracts and the published papers, there was a change in authors in 78.5 %, title in 42.8 %, and the data in 35.7 %.

Conclusions

The subsequent publication of conference abstracts as a full-paper is sub-optimal in the field of neonatology. Further research is needed to identify the factors responsible for the poor subsequent publication, and efforts need to be made to address them both at the institutional and the researchers’ level.

Keywords

Conference abstracts Scientific conferences Full publication 

References

  1. 1.
    Vecchi S, Belleudi V, Amato L, Davoli M, Perucci CA. Does direction of results of abstracts submitted to scientific conferences on drug addiction predict full publication? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2: MR000005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dhaliwal U, Kumar R. An observational study of the proceedings of all India ophthalmological congress, 2000 and subsequent publication in indexed journals. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008;56:189–95.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eloubeidi MA, Wade SB, Provenzale D. Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic research originally published in abstract form. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:275–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, Walley T, Haycox A, Williamson PR. Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10:iii-iv, ix-145.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Von Elm E, Costanza MC, Walder B, Tramer MR. More insights into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Riordan FA. Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published? Arch Dis Child. 2000;83:524–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saluja S, Chellani H, Gupta N, Modi M. NEOCON 2006, Abstracts. Varanasi: National Neonatology Forum; 2006.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davies MW, Dunster KR, East CE, Lingwood BE. Fate of abstracts published in the proceedings of the first annual perinatal society of Australia and New Zealand congress in 1997. J Paediatr Child Health. 2002;38:501–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nasir AA, Ameh EA, Poenaru D. Completion publication of abstracts presented at the scientific meetings of the Pan-African pediatric surgical association. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2013;10:246–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tyagi A, Chugh V, Kumar S, Sethi AK. Presentation of research in anesthesia: culmination into publication? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29:216–20.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. JAMA. 1994;272:158–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hopewell S, McDonald S. Full publication of trials initially reported as abstracts in the Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine 1980–2000. Int Med J. 2003;33:192–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bagla J, Mishra D. Time-lag from submission to printing in selected Indian biomedical journals. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:67–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gupta P, Mishra D. Impact factor 2011 and random musings (editorial). Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Medical Council of India. Salient features of Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 (amended up to May 2013). Available from http://www.mciindia.org/ RulesandRegulations/PGMedicalEducationRegulations2000.aspx. Accessed on 24 February, 2014.

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Archana Singh
    • 1
  • Priyanka Solanki
    • 1
  • Devendra Mishra
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PediatricsMaulana Azad Medical CollegeDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations