The Neonatal Resuscitation Program: Current Recommendations and a Look at the Future
The Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) consists of an algorithm and curriculum to train healthcare professionals to facilitate newborn infants’ transition to extrauterine life and to provide a standardized approach to the care of infants who require more invasive support and resuscitation. This review discusses the most recent update of the NRP algorithm and recommended guidelines for the care of newly born infants. Current challenges in training and assessment as well as the importance of ergonomics in the optimization of human performance are discussed. Finally, it is recommended that in order to ensure high-performing resuscitation teams, members should be selected and retained based on objective performance criteria and frequent participation in realistic simulated clinical scenarios.
KeywordsNeonatal resuscitation program Training Assessment Ergonomics Simulation Human performance
All authors participated in literature review, drafting the manuscript and have reviewed and approved the manuscript. Praveen Kumar will act as guarantor for this paper.
Conflict of Interest
Role of Funding Source
- 2.Lee AC, Cousens S, Wall SN, Niermeyer S, Darmstadt GL, Carlo WA, et al. Neonatal resuscitation and immediate newborn assessment and stimulation for the prevention of neonatal deaths: A systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi estimation of mortality effect. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:S3–12.Google Scholar
- 4.Neonatal Resuscitation Program: 20th Anniversary 1987–2007. http://www2.aap.org/NRP/docs/NRP-20thAnniversaryBook.pdf. Last accessed on 10/09/2013.
- 5.International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). http://www.ilcor.org/home/. Last accessed on 10/09/2013.
- 7.Perlman JM, Wyllie J, Kattwinkel J, Atkins DL, Chameides L, Goldsmith JP, et al. Neonatal Resuscitation Chapter Collaborators. Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e1319–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.American Academy of Pediatrics, American Heart Association. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. 6th ed. Dallas (TX): Elk Grove Village (IL); 2011.Google Scholar
- 10.Vain NE, Szyld EG, Prudent LM, Wiswell TE, Aguilar AM, Vivas NI. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning of meconium stained neonates before delivery of their shoulders: Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:597–602.Google Scholar
- 23.Esmail N, Saleh M, Ali A. Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation for Apgar score improvement in neonatal resuscitation. Egyptian J Anesthesiol. 2002;18:115–21.Google Scholar
- 27.O'Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: Success rates, duration, and adverse effects. Pediatrics. 2006;117:e16–21.Google Scholar
- 30.Houri PK, Frank LR, Menegazzi JJ, Taylor R. A randomized, controlled trial of two-thumb vs two-finger chest compression in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997;1:65–7.Google Scholar
- 34.Halamek LP. The rationale and strategy for rigorous human performance assessment in neonatal-perinatal medicine. In press. Neo Reviews. 2013.Google Scholar
- 37.http://www.ergonomics.org.uk/learning/what-ergonomics/. Accessed on 2013–09–01.
- 38.Halamek LP. Simulation in neonatal-perinatal medicine. In: Fanaroff AA, Martin RJ, eds. Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine: Diseases of the Fetus and Infant. 10 ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book; 2013. In press.Google Scholar