Utility of ApoB/ApoA1 Ratio for the Prediction of Cardiovascular Risk in Children with Metabolic Syndrome
- 120 Downloads
To assess whether apoB/apoA1 ratio is associated or not with metabolic syndrome in obese children.
A 198 obese children and 41 healthy control subjects were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. The apoB/apoA1 ratio and other metabolic sydrome components in obese children with/without metabolic syndrome were compared to healthy controls.
The apoA1 level did not show significant difference (p = 0.664) but apoB level (p = 0.000) and apoB/apoA1 ratio (p = 0.001) were significantly higher in obese group than in control group. Also, the apoB/apoA1 ratio was significantly higher in obese children with metabolic syndrome when compared to obese children without metabolic syndrome (p = 0.007) and showed positive correlation with triglyceride (r = 0.404, p = 0.000) and negative correlation with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (r = −0.593, p = 0.000).
The apoB/apoA1 ratio is associated with metabolic syndrome in obese children. An elevated apoB/apoA1 ratio may constitute an important feature of the metabolic syndrome. There is a need for long term follow-up studies concerning cardiovascular risk in obese children with metabolic syndrome and high apoB/apoA1 ratio.
KeywordsApolipoprotein AI Apolipoprotein B Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein AI ratio Child Metabolic syndrome
- 6.Bachorik PS, Kwiterovich PO. The measurement of plasma cholesterol, low density lipoprotein- and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. In: Hommes FA, editor. Techniques in diagnostic human biochemical genetics: a laboratory manual. New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc.; 1991. p. 425–9.Google Scholar
- 12.National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP): highlights of the report of the Expert Panel on Blood Cholesterol Levels in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics 1992;89:495-501.Google Scholar
- 15.Zwiaueer KFM, Pakosta R, Mueller T, Widhalm K. Cardiovascular risk factors in obese children in relation to weight and body fat distribution. J Am Coll Nutr. 1992;11:41S–50S.Google Scholar